Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Colarado Microdissection Needle: A Review

Ravi Kumar Chittoria, Jacob Antony Chakiath

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice 12(1):p 17-20, January-March 2023. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.12123.2

How Cite This Article:

Jacob Antony Chakiath, Ravi Kumar Chittoria/Colarado Microdissection Needle: A Review/Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice 2023;12(1) 17–20.

Timeline

Received : December 07, 2022         Accepted : January 15, 2023          Published : March 30, 2023

Abstract

Elective surgery requires planned incisions, and these require appropriate blades. Major elective incisions are used for sectioning of skin, vessels, deeper tissue. The Colorado micro dissection needle was introduced into clinical practice with various applications. The concept of electrocautery incisions is fast gaining acceptance not only amongst the neurosurgeons, but also the plastic surgeons, orthopedics, the general surgeons for thoracic and abdominal incisions and the myths behind its complications are soon fading with excellent result. This article reviews colaradomicrodissection needle in all aspects.


References

  • 1.   Kirkup J (1995) The history and evolution of surgical instruments- VI The surgical blade: from fingernail to ultrasound. Ann R CollSurgEngl 77: 380-388.
  • 2.   Bashetty K, Nadig Kapoor S (2009) Electrosurgery in aesthetic and restorative dentistry: A literature review and case reports. Jrnl Cons Dent 12(4): 139-146.
  • 3.   Hausner K (1986) Electrosurgery. Addison IL Elmed, Inc p. 2-10.
  • 4.   Sharma R (2017) Safety of coloradomicrodissection needle (stryker) for skin opening in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg 11(1): 115–118.
  • 5.   Rideout B, Shaw G Y (2004) Tonsillectomy using the coloradomicrodissection needle: A prospective series and comparative technique review. Southern Medical Journal 97(1): 11-17.
  • 7.   Sheikh B (2015) Safety and efficacy of electrocautery scalpel utilization for skin opening in neurosurgery. Br J Neurosurg 18(3): 268-272.
  • 8.   Kearns S, Conolly E, Mcnally S, McNamara D, Deasy J (2001) Randomised clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incisions in midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 88: 41-44.
  • 9.   Madhukar KT, Ganesh MT (2016) Comparative study of safety and efficacy of electrocautery blade with cold scalpel blade for skin opening during fixation of fracture of forearm bone with plate and screws. International Journal of Health & Allied Sciences 1(3): 153-157.
  • 10.   Margarita Peneva, AndrijanaGjorgjeska, Vladimir Ginoski, HristinaBreshkovska, RozaDzolevaTolevska (2018) Electro- surgical microneedle versus scalpel skin incisions in the facial region. Sanamed 13(3): 1-8.
  • 11.   RampalliViswa Chandra, BoyaSavitharani, AileniAmarender Reddy (2016) Comparing the outcomes of incisions made by coloradomicrodissection needle, electrosurgery tip, and surgical blade during periodontal surgery: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian SocPeriodontol 20: 612-622.
  • 12.   Yonca O Arat, Almila S Sezenoz, Francesco P Bernardini, Mark A Alford, MerihTepeoglu, et al. (2016) Comparison of Colorado Microdissection Needle Versus Scalpel Incision for Aesthetic Upper and Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty. OphthalPlastReconstrSurg 13: 1-6.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Jacob Antony Chakiath, Ravi Kumar Chittoria/Colarado Microdissection Needle: A Review/Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice 2023;12(1) 17–20.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
December 07, 2022 January 15, 2023 March 30, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.12123.2

Keywords

ColaradoMicrodissectionNeedleElectrocautery

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 08 July 2026, 23:15:34 (IST)


1734

Accesses

2
315
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received December 07, 2022
Accepted January 15, 2023
Published March 30, 2023

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share