Mohammed Aslam Guru Nanak College of Paramedical Sciences and Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Address for correspondence: Mohammed Aslam, Guru Nanak College of Paramedical Sciences and Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India E-mail: aslamahmed5477@gmail.com
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Aslam M. The impact of supervised home-based progressive resistance exercise programs on depressive symptoms in community dwelling older adults. Therapy Jr. 2025;18(2):153-61
Timeline
Received : January 09, 2025
Accepted : February 15, 2025
Published : June 16, 2025
Abstract
Background: Depression among elderly individuals is a prevalent concern, often leading to diminished quality of life. Progressive Resistance Exercise (PRE) has been identified as a potential intervention to all eviatede pressive symptomsinthis demographic. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of home-based Progressive Resistance Exercise in reducing depressive symptoms among community-dwelling elderly adults. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 30 communitydwelling elderly individuals (15 males and 15 females) aged 65-85 years, all exhibiting mild-to-moderate depression as indicated by a Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score between 11 and 19. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: • Experimental Group (n=15): Engaged in home-based Progressive Resistance Exercise. • Control Group (n=15): Participated in free active range of motion exercises. • Results: Both groups exhibited significant reductions inGDSscorespostintervention, indicating decreased depressive symptoms. The Experimental Group demonstrated a mean GDS reduction of 1.8 points, while the Control Group showed a mean reduction of 0.92 points. The difference between groups wasstatisticallysignicant(p<0.000),suggestingthatPREwasmoreeffective in reducing depressive symptoms compared to ROM exercises. • Conclusion: The study concluded that both Progressive Resistance Exercise and free active range of motion exercises are effective in reducing depressive symptoms among older adults. The findings were highly significant in both groups, with the Experimental Group showing a more pronouced improvement. This suggests that Progressive Resistance Exercise may offer a more effective intervention for alleviating depression in elderly individuals.
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
2. Alexopoulos G.S., Meyers B.S., Young R.C., et al. Neuropsychiatric aspects of late-life depression. Biol Psychiatry. 1997; 41(1): 24-34.
3. Blazer D.G. Depression in late life: review and synthesis. J Gerontol. 1982; 37(2): 161-169.
4. Reynolds C.F., 3rd, Kupfer D.J. Depression in adults. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(25): 19411949.
5. Blumenthal J.A., Hoffman B.M., Sherwood A., et al. Effects of exercise on mood disorders. JAMA. 1999; 281(15): 1447-1452.
6. Dishman R.K., Motl R.W., Saunders R.B., et al. Physical activity and depression: a metaanalysis. Psychosom Med. 2006; 68(1): 8-16.
7. Blumenthal J.A., Babyak M.A., Hoffman B.M., et al. Exercise and depression: evidence-based recommendations. JAMA. 2007; 297(19): 2094-2105.
8. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2014.
9. Cotman C.W., Berchtold N.C. Exercise: a behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002; 25(6): 295-301.
10. Blumenthal J.A., Babyak M.A., Hoffman B.M., et al. Exercise treatment for major depression. Psychosom Med. 2000; 62(5): 51-58.
11. Duman R.S., Monteggia LM. A neurotrophic model of stress-related mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2006; 59(12): 1167-1170.
12. Musselman D.L., Cox C., Allman R.M., et al. Depression and its treatment in older adults: challenges and opportunities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56(1): 15-24.
13. Babyak M.A., Blumenthal J.A., Herman S., et al. Exercise treatment for major depression. Psychosom Med. 2000; 62(5): 51-58.
14. Blumenthal J.A., Babyak M.A., Hoffman B.M., et al. Exercise treatment for major depression. Psychosom Med. 2000; 62(5): 51-58
15. Dishman R.K., Motl R.W., Saunders R.B., et al. Physical activity and depression: a metaanalysis. Psychosom Med. 2006; 68(1): 8-16.
16. Bertolucci, R.L., et al. (2021). The effects of resistance exercise on brain health and cognition in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 98, 39-46.
17. Bherer, L., et al. (2017). Effects of physical exercise on cognitive and brain plasticity in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 25(3), 189-197.
18. Cohen, S.M., et al. (2016). Neuroplasticity in depression: Implications for the treatment of depression with exercise. Journal of Affective Disorders, 203, 303-312.
19. Duman, R.S., & Aghajanian, G.K. (2012). Neurobiology of depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 73(10), e29-37.
20. Graham, J.E., et al. (2019). Progressive resistance training and depression: A review of the evidence and clinical recommendations. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 39(6), 633-640.
21. López-López, M., et al. (2020). Exercise, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and mental health in elderly adults. Current Alzheimer Research, 17(10), 892-901.
22. Naylor, E.C., et al. (2014). BDNF and depression: A review of neuroplasticity mechanisms in mental illness. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 42(8), 1133-1142.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
Self
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This study was conducted by me and All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Aslam M. The impact of supervised home-based progressive resistance exercise programs on depressive symptoms in community dwelling older adults. Therapy Jr. 2025;18(2):153-61
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Depicts the age difference between the Group A and Group B
Description: No description available.
Shows mean ages: Group A 72.53, Group B 74.93, with a 2.4 difference
Description: No description available.
Shows intergroup comparison of mean and standard deviation of Pre GDS Score of both the Group A and Group B
Description: No description available.
Shows pre-GDS scores: Group A 14.4, Group B 14.7
Description: No description available.
Shows highly significant pre-post GDS score improvements for Group A (t=9.53) and Group B (t=7.24, p<0.0001). Paired t-test: Intragroup comparison of Pre-Post GDS of Group A
Description: No description available.
Heading
Description: No description available.
Depicts improvement in mean difference of pre and post GDS score of subjects of Group A. The pre and post GDS score of Group A is 14.4 and 12.6 respectively
Description: No description available.
Shows Group B’s GDS improvement: 14.7 to 13.78
Description: No description available.
Depicts the difference of Pre and Post GDS score of Group A and Group B
Description: No description available.
Depicts the mean and standard deviation of post Intervention (Post-GDS) training scores of Group A and Group B
Description: No description available.
Shows a mean difference of 1.18 between Post GDS Scores of Group A and B
Description: No description available.
Shows mean difference between Pre Post GDS Value of both the Group A and Group B
Description: No description available.
Shows mean difference between Pre Post GDS Value of both the Group A and Group B
Description: No description available.
Shows GDS improvement: Group A 1.8, Group B 0.92, highlighting Group A’s greater change