Background: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects quality of life and functional capacity. Among the various physiotherapy interventions available, Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) and the McKenzie Method (Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy) are commonly employed manual therapy techniques. However, direct comparisons of their clinical effectiveness remain limited. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Mulligan SNAGs and the McKenzie Method as adjuncts to standard physiotherapy in reducing pain, improving function, enhancing range of motion (ROM), and promoting psychological wellbeing in patients with CNP. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 56 participants with chronic neck pain, divided equally into two intervention groups: Mulligan SNAGs and McKenzie Method, both combined with standard physiotherapy. Interventions were applied five times weekly for four weeks. The outcome measures included the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), neck pain and disability scale-Gujarati version (NPAD-G), WHO-5 Well-Being Index, cervical ROM, and Global Rating of Change (GRoC). Assessments were conducted at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. Results: Both groups showed statistically significant within-group improvements across all outcome measures (p < 0.05). Pain intensity, functional disability, and psychological well-being improved notably with increased cervical ROM and high patient satisfaction. However, the between-group differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Mulligan SNAGs and the McKenzie Method are both effective adjuncts to standard physiotherapy for managing chronic neck pain. Both techniques can be selected based on patient preference, therapist expertise, and clinical presentation.
Original Article
English
P. 351-362