Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

To Compare the Effectiveness of Static Stretch versus Post Isometric Relaxation along with Remote Myofascial Release on Hamstring Tightness in Young Population with Hamstring Tightness

Leonard Pillai, Surbhi Thapliyal, Sandeep Kumar, Niraj Kumar, Sushant Kimothi

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal 19(1):p 57-61, Jan - March 2026. | DOI: 10.21088/potj.0974.5777.19126.6

How Cite This Article:

Leonard Pillai, Surbhi Thapliyal, Sandeep Kumar, et al. To Compare the Effectiveness of Static Stretch versus Post Isometric Relaxation along with Remote Myofascial Release on Hamstring Tightness in Young Population with Hamstring Tightness. Therapy Jr. 2026; 19(1): 56-60.

Timeline

Received : November 19, 2026         Accepted : January 29, 2026          Published : March 30, 2026

Abstract

Background: Hamstring tightness is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition, especially among young adults, leading to reduced flexibility, altered biomechanics and increased injury risk. Traditional management approaches include static stretching, while post-isometric relaxation (PIR) and myofascial release have gained attention for their potential synergistic effects. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of static stretching combined with remote myofascial release versus post-isometric relaxation combined with remotemyofascial release on hamstring flexibility in young adults with hamstring tightness. Methods: A total of 46 participants aged 18–25 years with hamstring tightness were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A (Static Stretch + Remote Myofascial Release) and Group B (PIR + Remote Myofascial Release). Outcome measures included the Sit and Reach Test, Active Knee Extension (AKE) Test, and goniometric measurement of hip flexion. Assessments were taken at baseline, after intervention, and at follow-up. Data were analyzed using paired and unpaired t-tests, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in hamstring flexibility post-intervention (p < 0.05). Group B demonstrated a slightly greater improvement in AKE and Sit and Reach scores compared to Group A, though differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Both static stretching and PIR, when combined with remote myofascial release, are effective in improving hamstring flexibility in young adults. PIR may provide a marginal advantage in functional outcomes.


References

  • 1.   Freeman M.A. Instability of the foot after injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965; 47(4): 669-677.
  • 2.   Yeung M.S., Chan K.M., So C.H., Yuan W.Y. An epidemiological survey on ankle sprain. Br J Sports Med. 1994; 28(2): 112-116.
  • 3.   Gerber J.P., Williams G.N., Scoville C.R., Arciero R.A., Taylor D.C. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998; 19(10): 653-660.
  • 4.   Delahunt E., Coughlan G.F., Caulfield B., Nightingale E.J., Lin C.W., Hiller C.E. Inclusion criteria when investigating insufficiencies in chronic ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42(11): 2106-2121.
  • 5.   Gribble P.A., Delahunt E., Bleakley C.M., et al. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: A position statement of the international ankle consortium. J Athl Train. 2014; 49(1): 121-127.
  • 6.   De Noronha M., França L.C., Haupenthal A., Nunes G.S. Intrinsic predictive factors for ankle sprain in active university students: A prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 23(5): 541-547.
  • 7.   Hootman J.M., Dick R., Agel J. Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: Summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives. J Athl Train. 2007; 42(2): 311-319.
  • 8.   Wikstrom E.A., Brown C.N. Minimumreporting standards for copers in chronic ankle instability research. Sports Med. 2014; 44(2):251-268.
  • 9.   Wikstrom E.A., Tillman M.D., Chmielewski T.L., Cauraugh JH, Naugle K.E., Borsa P.A. Discriminating between copers and people with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train 2012; 47(2): 136-142. 36
  • 10.   Hiller C.E., Refshauge K.M., Herbert RD, Kilbreath S.L. Intrinsic predictors of lateral ankle sprain in adolescent dancers: A prospective cohort study. Clinical J Sport Med. 2008; 18(1): 44-48.
  • 11.   Hiller C.E., Nightingale E.J., Lin C.W., Coughlan G.F., Caulfield B., Delahunt E. Characteristics of people with recurrent ankle sprains: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Br J Sports Med. 2011; 45(8): 660-672.
  • 12.   Munn J., Sullivan S.J., Schneiders A.G. Evidence of sensorimotor deficits in functional ankle instability: a systematic review with metaanalysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2009; 13(1): 2-12.
  • 13.   Konradsen L. Sensori-motor control of the uninjured and injured human ankle. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002; 12(3): 199-203.
  • 14.   Chimera N.J., Swanik K.A., Swanik CB, Straub SJ. Effects of plyometric training on muscleactivation strategies and performance in female athletes. J Athl Train. 2004; 39(1): 24-31.
  • 15.   Ismail M.M., Ibrahim M.M., Youssef E.F., El Shorbagy K.M. Plyometric training versus resistive exercises after acute lateral ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31(6): 523-530.
  • 16.   Lephart S., Abt J.P., Ferris C., et al. Neuromuscular and biomechanical characteristic changes in high school athletes: a plyometric versus basic resistance program. Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39(12): 932-938.
  • 17.   Renstrom P., Arms SW, Stanwyck T.S., Johnson R.J., Pope M.H. Strain within the anterior cruciate ligament during hamstring and quadriceps activity. Am J Sports Med. 1986; 14(1): 83-87.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Leonard Pillai, Surbhi Thapliyal, Sandeep Kumar, et al. To Compare the Effectiveness of Static Stretch versus Post Isometric Relaxation along with Remote Myofascial Release on Hamstring Tightness in Young Population with Hamstring Tightness. Therapy Jr. 2026; 19(1): 56-60.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Received Accepted Published
November 19, 2026 January 29, 2026 March 30, 2026

DOI: 10.21088/potj.0974.5777.19126.6

Keywords

Hamstring tightnessStatic stretchPost-isometric relaxationMyofascial releaseFlexibilityYoung adults

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 17 June 2026, 10:04:48 (IST)


1101

Accesses

7
304
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received November 19, 2026
Accepted January 29, 2026
Published March 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Access this article



Share