Kajol Bhati Assistant Professor, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India, India
Sudhanshu Sawhney1 null null, null
Kajol Bhati2 null null, null
Priyanka Chhabra3 null null, null
Divya Tripathy null null, null
Address for correspondence: Kajol Bhati, Assistant Professor, School of Basic and Applied Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India, India E-mail: bhati.kajol18@gmail.com
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology
14(2 (Special Issue)):p 288-293, April-June 2021. | DOI: 10.21088/ijfmp.0974.3383.14221.39
How Cite This Article:
Sawhney S. Role of nanotechnology in techniques in fingerprint enhancement. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2021;14(2 Special):288-94.
Timeline
Received : April 02, 2021
Accepted : April 20, 2021
Published : June 30, 2021
Abstract
Fingerprints have been utilized in criminal and judicial investigations for establishing
the identity of the accused/suspects for a long time. Fingerprints are an effective
tool for determining who committed a crime. Nonetheless, easily detectable or visible
marks are infrequently found at a crime scene; most of the time, they are latent, requiring the use of special methods to identify them. Fingerprint comparison should be cost
effective and time bound to quickly obtain results with quality assurance. In this case,
nanotechnology and its continued development have resulted in a range of applications in forensic science. Nano particles have been proposed as a solution for fingerprint
detection and enhancement due to their versatility and smaller particle size. Because
nanoparticles do not alter the composition of evidence, they can easily aid in the detection of high-resolution prints, and these evidences, unlike conventional techniques,
can be re-used for any other chemical treatment. In most legal science research facilities, traditional methods such as black powder, fluorescent powder, and white powders
are used. This review paper summarizes the various types of nanoparticle techniques
that can be used for fingerprint identification and comparison, such as Camphor-based
Nano carbon, Acetylated cashew gum-based silver nanoparticles and so on.
References
1. • Brandão MS, Jesus JR, de Araújo AR, da Silva MJ, Silva ALS, de Oliveira RA, et al. Acetylated cashew gum-based silver nanoparticles for the development of latent fingerprints on porous surfaces. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag. 2020;14:100383.
2. • Madhavan AA, Philip S, Jose J. Camphoric based nano carbon for the visual enhancement of latent fingerprints. In: 2020 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET); 2020 Feb 4-Apr 9; Dubai, United Arab Emirates. IEEE; 2020. p. 1-4.
4. • Bhagat DS, Suryawanshi IV, Chavan SK, et al. Greener synthesis of CuO nanoparticles for enhanced development of latent fingerprints. Mater Today Proc. 2021;36:747-50.
5. • Lee PLT, Kanodarwala FK, Lennard C, Spindler X. Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: method optimisation and evaluation. Forensic Sci Int. 2019;298:372-83.
6. • Li H, Guo X, Liu J, Li F. A synthesis of fluorescent starch based on carbon nanoparticles for fingerprints detection. Opt Mater (Amst). 2016;60:404-10.
7. • Prasad V, Lukose S, Agarwal P, Prasad L. Role of nanomaterials for forensic investigation and latent fingerprinting—a review. J Forensic Sci. 2020;65(1):26-36.
8. • Swati G, Bidwai D, Haranath D. Red emitting CaTiO3:Pr3+ nanophosphors for rapid identification of high contrast latent fingerprints. Nanotechnology. 2020;31(36):364007.
9. • Jaber N, Lesniewski A, Gabzon H, Gazit S, Zaltsman A, Mandler D, et al. Visualization of latent fingermarks by nanotechnology: reversed development on paper—a remedy to the variation in sweat composition. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51(49):12224-7.
10. • Champod C, Lennard CJ, Margot P, Stoilovic M. Fingerprints and other ridge skin impressions. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2017.
11. • Papi S, Ferrara M, Anthonioz A. On the generation of synthetic fingerprint alterations. In: 2016 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG); 2016 Sep 21-23; Darmstadt, Germany. IEEE; 2016. p. 1-6.
12. • Tashiro S, Nakata K, Fujii Y, et al. Multipoint hydrogen bonding-based molecular recognition of amino acids and peptide derivatives in a porous metal-macrocycle framework: residue-specificity, diastereoselectivity, and conformational control. Small. 2021;17(22):e2005803.
13. • Chadwick S, Moret S, Bécue A, Esslinger K. Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;289:381-9.
14. • Haque F, Westland AD, Milligan J, Kerr FM. A small particle (iron oxide) suspension for detection of latent fingerprints on smooth surfaces. Forensic Sci Int. 1989;41(1-2):73-82.
15. • Menzel ER, Savoy SM, Ulvick SJ, Cheng KH, Murdock RH, Soper SA. Photoluminescent semiconductor nanocrystals for fingerprint detection. J Forensic Sci. 2000;45(3):545-51.
16. • Harris LA, Goff JD, Carmichael AY, Riffle JS, Harburn JJ, St. Pierre TG, et al. Magnetite nanoparticle dispersions stabilized with triblock copolymers. Chem Mater. 2003;15(6):1367-77.
17. • Yeshodamma S, Sunitha DV, Nagabhushana H, et al. Monovalent ions co-doped SrTiO3:Pr3+ nanostructures for the visualization of latent fingerprints and can be red component for solid state devices. J Lumin. 2019;208:371-87.
18. • Ehsani A, Jaleh B, Nasrollahzadeh M. Electrochemical properties and electrocatalytic activity of conducting polymer/copper nanoparticles supported on reduced graphene oxide composite. J Power Sources. 2014;257:300-7.
19. • Kahru A, Ivask A. Mapping the dawn of nanoecotoxicological research. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46(3):823-33.
20. • Sodhi GS, Kaur J. Powder method for detecting latent fingerprints: a review. Forensic Sci Int. 2001;120(3):172-6.
21. • Bhati K, Tripathy DB. Role of nanoparticles in latent fingerprinting: an update. J Forensic Sci Crim Investig. 2020;14(2):555883.
22. • Qin G, Zhang M, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Liu S. Visualizing latent fingerprints by electrodeposition of metal nanoparticles. J Electroanal Chem. 2013;693:122-6.
23. • Mukherjee A, Adak MK, Das S, et al. A simple chemical method for the synthesis of Cu2+ engrafted MgAl2O4 nanoparticles: efficient fluoride adsorbents, photocatalyst and latent fingerprint detection. J Environ Sci (China). 2020;88:301-15.
24. • Shen J, Sun LD, Yan CH. Luminescent rare earth nanomaterials for bioprobe applications. Dalton Trans. 2008;(42):5687-97.
25. • Bécue A, Moret S. Application de [partial title]. [Journal]. 2013;191:35. [Note: The input data for this reference appears to be a fragmented file path or thesis annex; Volume 191 of Forensic Sci Int was published in 2009].
26. • Dakshayini BS, Reddy KR, Mishra A, et al. Role of conducting polymer and metal oxide-based hybrids for applications in ampereometric sensors and biosensors. Microchem J. 2019;147:7-24.
27. • Singh K, Sharma S, Garg RK. Visualization of latent fingerprints using silica gel G: a new technique. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2013;3(1):20-5.
28. • Kumar S, Rai SB. Latent fingerprint imaging using Dy and Sm codoped HfO2 nanophosphors: structure and luminescence properties. Part Part Syst Charact. 2019;36(6):1900048.
29. • Barros HL, Stefani V. Micro-structured fluorescent powders for detecting latent fingerprints on different types of surfaces. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2019;368:137-46.
30. • Bécue A, Champod C, Margot P. Use of gold nanoparticles as molecular intermediates for the detection of fingermarks. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;168(2-3):169-76.
31. • Penn SG, He L, Natan MJ. Nanoparticles for bioanalysis. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2003;7(5):609-15.
32. • Salama J, Aumeer-Donovan S, Lennard C, Roux C. Evaluation of the fingermark reagent oil red O as a possible replacement for physical developer. J Forensic Identif. 2008;58(2):203-37.
33. • Tahtouh M, Despland P, Shimmon R, Kalman JR, Reedy BJ. The application of infrared chemical imaging to the detection and enhancement of latent fingerprints: method optimization and further findings. J Forensic Sci. 2007;52(5):1089-96.
34. • Croxton RS, Baron MG, Butler D, Kent T, Sears VG. Variation in amino acid and lipid composition of latent fingerprints. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;199(1-3):93-102.
35. • Barron IW, Haque F, Westland AD. Rejuvenation of latent fingerprints by the freeze-thaw technique. Ident News. 1981;31(11):14-5.
36. • Choi MJ, McDonagh AM, Maynard P, Roux C. Metal-containing nanoparticles and nano-structured particles in fingermark detection. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;179(2-3):87-97.
37. • Choi MJ, Smolinska A, Moxham HM, Martin AA, McDonagh AM, Maynard PJ. Fluorescent TiO2 powders prepared using a new perylene diimide dye: applications in latent fingermark detection. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;173(2-3):154-60.
38. • Kerr FM, Barron IW, Haque F, Westland AD. Organic-based fluorescent powders for latent fingerprint detection on smooth surfaces: Part II. Can Soc Forensic Sci J. 1983;16(1):39-44
About this article
Cite this article
Sawhney S. Role of nanotechnology in techniques in fingerprint enhancement. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2021;14(2 Special):288-94.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.