Abstract

IntroductIon: This study was done with an objective to do a craniometric study of supra meatal triangle and mastoid process to explore the variations as a determinant to sex. Methodology: A total of 47 skull bones formed our study sample which comprised of 31 males and 16 females Six landmarks were identified on each side of the skulland measurements were taken using Digital Vernier caliper with precision of 0.01. observatIons and results: The area of supra-meatal triangle in male was 134.68± 21.69 mm3 on the right side and 134.17± 16.98 mm3 on the left side. In females the area of supra-meatal triangle was 114.82± 21.99 mm3 on right side and 122.46± 24.05 mm3 on the left side. In male skulls, the length, breadth and width of the mastoid process on the right side was 23.56 ± 2.88, 19.81 ± 2.49 and 11.46 ± 2.51 mm and the left side measurements were 23.33 ± 2.17, 18.93 ± 1.91 and 10.84 ± 2.39mm respectively. In females the length, breath and width of mastoid were 23.03 ± 2.94, 18.87 ± 2.42 and 10.03 ± 2.32 mm on right side and 22.06 ± 1.99, 17.85± 2.22 and 9.43 ± 1.89 mm in left side respectively. conclusIon: In this present study the supra meatal triangle and all measurements of mastoid process were greater in males with the mastoid breadth and width showed statistically significant values. The findings can be applied to unknown skull samples or bone fragmentsand can provide insight to future studies of forensic anthropologists and ENT surgeons.

• 1.   Gray’s Anatomy the anatomical basis of clinical practice 40th edition. Susan Standering. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. London; 2008: p1223
• 2.   Kronenberg J, Baumgartner W, Migirov L, Dagan T, Hildesheimer M. The suprameatal approach: an alternative surgical approach to cochlear implantation. OtolNeurotol, 2004 Jan; 25(1): 41-4
• 3.   Van Osch K, Allen D, Gare B, Hudson TJ, Ladak H, Agrawal SK. Morphological analysis of sigmoid sinus anatomy: clinical applications to neurotological surgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48:2
• 4.   A.Aslan,C. Mutlu, O.Celik, F.Govsa, T.Ozgur, M.Egrilmez. Surgical implications of anatomical landmarks on the lateral surface of the mastoid bone.SurgRadiolAnat (2004) 26: 263–267
• 6.   Rogers T.L. Determining the sex of human remains through cranial morphology. 2005. J Forensic Sci. 50:493–500.
• 7.   Kanchan T, Gupta A, Krishan K. Estimation of sex from mastoid triangle - a craniometric analysis. J Forensic Leg Med 2013; 20:855-60.
• 8.   Mukerjee JB. Forensic Medicine and Toxicology.Edited: R.N. Karmakar. 5th Edition.Kolkata. Academic Publisher. 2018:167-168
• 9.   Patnaik VV, Phatak A. Determination of sex from mastoid process by discriminant function analysis. J Anat Soc India 2010; 59(2): 222-228.
• 10.   Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Sex estimation from the mastoid process among North Indians.J Forensic Sci 2012;57:434-9
• 11.   Kemkes A, Gobel T. Metric assessment of the mastoid triangle for sex determination: a validation study. J Forensic Sci 2006; 51: 985-9.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding