Sapate A.B. Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Biradar V.R. Intern, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Band R.M. ssociate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Petkar M.R. Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Ghangale A.L. Professor & Head, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Address for correspondence: Band R.M., ssociate Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College Hospital & Research Center, Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India E-mail: ramband1986@gmail.com
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Sapate AB, Biradar VR, Band RM, Petkar MR, Ghangale AL. Knowledge and Perception of Medical Negligence in Medical Students. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2025;18(2):87-93.
Timeline
Received : April 12, 2025
Accepted : June 08, 2025
Published : June 20, 2025
Abstract
Introduction: Absence of reasonable care and skill, or willful negligence by medical practitioner in the treatment of a patient resulting in bodily/psychological injury or death of the patient is medical negligence. This survey was conducted to assess the knowledge and awareness of medical students and interns in a medical college. Materials & Methods: It is an observational cross-sectional study in which 306 IIIrd Professional M.B.B.S. Part-2 students & Interns participated in 10 multiplechoice questions based on different aspects of negligence in medical practice and its prevention. The data collected were tabulated and statistically analyzed to draw conclusions. Results: Out of 306 total respondents, 27.80% (n=85) had adequate knowledge, while 60.50% (n=185) had partial knowledge, and 11.80% (n=36) had poor knowledge. It was found that adequate knowledge was present in 36.41% (n=71) of IIIrd Professional M.B.B.S. Part-2 students, and 12.61% (n=14) of Interns. Conclusion: IIIrd Professional M.B.B.S. had better knowledge about medical negligence when compared to Interns showing labile memory of lessons taught in UG curriculum. A reasonable approach to tackle this issue could be to ensure better medico-legal training for medical students.
References
1. Reddy KSN, Murty OP. Medical law and ethics. In: The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 35th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd; 2022. p. 26-29.
2. Jena AB, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A. Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(7):629-636. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370
3. Nath A, Ropmay AD, Slong D, Patowary AJ, Rao AJ. A cross-sectional study on knowledge of registered medical practitioners, regarding management of medico-legal cases in Meghalaya. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(3):904-907. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_49_21
4. Mathew S, Samant N, Cooksey C, Ramm O. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about medicolegal education: a survey of OB/GYN residents. Perm J. 2020;24:1-7. doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.217
5. Saltstone SP, Saltstone R, Rowe BH. Knowledge of medical-legal issues. Survey of Ontario family medicine residents. Can Fam Physician. 1997;43:669-673.
6. Shah HH, Gjelsvik A, Kobayashi L, Clyne B. Views of emergency medicine trainees on adverse events and negligence: survey results from an emergency medicine training program in a regional health care system following the national standard of care. In: Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.
7. Chatterjee B, Sarkar J. Awareness of medical ethics among undergraduates in a West Bengal medical college. Indian J Med Ethics. 2012;9(2):93-100.
8. Chandra MS, Math SB. Progress in medicine: compensation and medical negligence in India: does the system need a quick fix or an overhaul? Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016;19(Suppl 1):S21-S27. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.192887
9. Banait S, Jain J, Bokariya P, Khan S. Effectiveness of healthcare ethics training in the undergraduate medical curriculum: A quasi-experimental study from rural India. Indian J Med Ethics. 2022;-:1-8. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2022.012
10. Nash L, Daly M, Johnson M, Walter G, Walton M, Willcock S, et al. Psychological morbidity in Australian doctors who have and have not experienced a medico-legal matter: cross-sectional survey. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007;41(11):917-925. doi: 10.1080/00048670701634960
11. Limentani AE. The role of ethical principles in health care and the implications for ethical codes. J Med Ethics. 1999;25(5):394-398. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.5.394
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available.
Funding
Self
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
Mandatory permission from Institutional ethics sub-committee obtained vide Ref. No. IESC/107/2022 dated 8/8/2022.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank our departmental staff for support during survey and data collection.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Sapate AB, Biradar VR, Band RM, Petkar MR, Ghangale AL. Knowledge and Perception of Medical Negligence in Medical Students. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2025;18(2):87-93.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Description: Figure 2: Distribution of Respondents of the basis of Gender
Heading
Description: Figure 3: Distribution of respondents according to academic year
Heading
Description: Figure 4: Comparison of Level of Knowledge of Respondents
Heading
Description: Table 1 shows the breakdown of participants according to their gender. 203 (66.3%) of the respondents were male, and 103 (33.7%) were female.
Heading
Description: As can be seen from Table 2, the respondents included 195 (63.7%) Students of IIIrd Professional M.B.B.S. Part-2 and 111 (36.3%) Interns.
Heading
Description: When compared based on the academic year, it was found that adequate knowledge was present in 36.41% (n=71) of IIIrd Professional M.B.B.S. Part-2 students, and 12.61% (n=14) of Interns. This has been depicted in Table 3
Heading
Description: Table 4 shows the question-wise distribution of correct and incorrect responses given by all 306 respondents.