Abstract

Every day, forensic investigators find themselves buried under an avalanche of digital evidence, terabytes of files, logs, and signals that can make even the most seasoned analyst feel overwhelmed. At the same time, cybercriminals are sharpening their tools, probing weaknesses in traditional encryption, and leaving us vulnerable just when we need airtight security most. Enter quantum cryptography: a radical shift in how we protect information, where the very laws of physics guard our data. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) uses delicate photons to forge encryption keys that, if tampered with, immediately betray an eavesdropper’s presence. Alongside this, post-quantum cryptographic schemes promise software defenses that even future quantum computers can’t crack.1 In this review, we’ll walk you through how these quantum-powered techniques can transform three critical stages of forensic work: capturing evidence without fear of interception, preserving an unbreakable chain of custody, and verifying data integrity long after a case closes. You’ll learn about the nuts and bolts of QKD networks,2 the latest in quantum-resistant algorithms, and how hybrids of the two can give investigators both immediate and future-proof protection. We’ll also tackle the real-world hurdles, bulky hardware, system integration headaches, and the need for common standards, and point toward research paths and practical roadmaps that could bring quantum-secure forensics into every lab.

• 1.   Amanzholova S., Priyanka A.C. Exploring advancements, applications, and challenges in the realm of quantum cryptography. Next Generation Mechanisms for Data Encryption. 2025 Jan 24: 116.
• 2.   van Daalen O. From Encryption to Quantum Computing: The Governance of Information Security and Human Rights. Springer Nature; 2024.
• 3.   Sarkar A., Guha Roy D., Datta P. An Overview of the Discrete Logarithm Problem in Cryptography. In International Conference on Advanced Computing and Applications 2024 Feb 23 (pp. 129-143). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
• 4.   Hammoudeh M., Firth C.M., Bounceur A., Adebisi B., Vasan D. Quantum Key Distribution Principles and Protocols. In Quantum Computing 2024 Dec 27 (pp. 95-117). CRC Press.
• 5.   Bhuyan A.K., Dutta H. Harnessing Quantum Entanglement: Comprehensive Strategies for Enhanced Communication and Beyond in Quantum Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2406.08833. 2024 Jun 13.
• 6.   6. Trenyi R., Ball S., Glynn D.G., Curty M. Geometrical constructions of purity testing protocols and their applications to quantum communication. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2503.14003. 2025 Mar 18.
• 7.   The NIST PQC standardization process, summarized by Chen et al. has shortlisted lattice-based (e.g., CRYSTALS-Kyber), code-based, and multivariate schemes for standardization. Lyubashevsky’s Fiat–Shamir– based signature protocols illustrate how PQC enables quantum-safe digital signatures without specialized hardware.
• 8.   Scalise P., Garcia R., Boeding M., Hempel M., Sharif H. An Applied Analysis of Securing 5G/6G Core Networks with Post-Quantum Key Encapsulation Methods. Electronics. 2024 Oct 30; 13(21): 4258.
• 9.   Baseri Y., Chouhan V., Hafid A. Navigating quantum security risks in networked environments: A comprehensive study of quantum-safe network protocols. Computers & Security. 2024 May 1: 103883.
• 10.   Nguyen H., Huda S., Nogami Y., Nguyen T.T. Security in post-quantum era: A comprehensive survey on lattice-based algorithms. IEEE Access. 2025 May 19.
• 11.   Kumar P., Kundu N.K., Kar B. Quantum Key Distribution Routing Protocol in Quantum Networks: Overview and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2407.13156. 2024 Jul 18.
• 12.   Okunola A., Kay J., Draght M. InformationTheoretic Security Analysis of QKD Protocols under Realistic Noise Models Authors. Available at SSRN 5228949. 2025 Apr 24.
• 13.   Aydeger A., Zeydan E., Yadav A.K., Hemachandra K.T., Liyanage M. Towards a quantum-resilient future: Strategies for transitioning to post-quantum cryptography. In 2024 15th International Conference on Network of the Future (NoF) 2024 Oct 2 (pp. 195-203). IEEE.
• 14.   Faba J., Brito J.P., Cresta J., Pastor A., Lopez D., Brito R., Buruaga J.S., Martin V. A hybrid approach to address the transition to quantumresistant cryptography in telecommunication environments. In 2025 International Conference on Quantum Communications, Networking, and Computing (QCNC) 2025 Mar 31 (pp. 122- 126). IEEE.
• 15.   Erukala S.B., Tokmakov D., Perumalla A., Kaluri R., Bekyarova-Tokmakova A., Mileva N., Lubomirov S. A secure end-to-end communication framework for cooperative IoT networks using hybrid blockchain system. Scientific Reports. 2025 Apr 1; 15(1): 11077.
• 16.   Abdullah, Alharith & Obeid, Noor. (2021). Efficient Implementation for PRINCE Algorithm in FPGA Based on the BB84 Protocol. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1818. 012216. 10.1088/1742-6596/1818/1/012216.
• 17.   Adnan M.H., Ahmad Zukarnain Z., Harun N.Z. Quantum Key Distribution for 5G Networks: A Review, State of Art and Future Directions. Future Internet Internet. 2022 Feb 25; 14(3): 73. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.3390/fi14030073

Data Sharing Statement

Funding