Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

A Pilot Study to find out Sexual Dimorphism in Human Skulls using Curvilinear Sagittal Suture Length

Ashwini Anant Bhosale, Ajay Anirudha Taware, Vijay Tarachand Jadhav, Harish Suresh Tatiya, Abhijit Limbraj Bandgar, Hemant Vithoba Vaidya

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator


Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 16(3):p 171-176, July-September 2023. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijfmp.0974.3383.16323.1

How Cite This Article:

Bhosale AA, Taware AA, Jadhav VT, et al. A pilot study to find out sexual dimorphism in human skulls using curvilinear sagittal suture length. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2023;16(3):171-176.

Timeline

Received : March 25, 2023         Accepted : July 05, 2023          Published : September 30, 2023

Abstract

Identifi cation is the determination of the individuality of a person based on certain physical characteristics, i.e., exact fi xation of personality. Correct sex estimation reduces the possible number of individuals that need to be considered by approximately 50%. According to Krogman, sexing can be 90% accurate by skull alone, but till dateonly a handful of studies have been undertaken to study the relation of cranial suture length with parameters like sex and stature. This study was conducted on 400 deceased adults brought for postmortem examination during study period. All the observations related to the current study were done by naked eye and data regarding age, sex and curvilinear length of sagittal suture were recorded. The mean curvilinear length of sagittal suture was 12.42 ± 0.74 cm in females and 12.76 ± 0.71 cm in male and the mean length of the sagittal suture was signifi cantly higher among males as compared to females. Curvilinear length of sagittal suture is a reliable predictor of sex.


References

  • 1.   Reddy KSN. Murty OP. Identification. In: The Essentials of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 34th edition. New Delhi (India): Jaypee Brothers medical publishers. 2017. p.55-80.
  • 2.   Khandare SV, Bhise SS, Shinde AB. Age estimation from cranial sutures–a Postmortem study. International Journal of Healthcare and Biomedical Research. 2015 Apr; 3(3):192-202.
  • 3.   Sobh ZK, Gheat AM. Coronal and sagittal suture lengths as novel measurements for sex identification in a sample from the Egyptian population. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. 2021 Mar;17(1):19-26.
  • 4.   Quincey D, Carle G, Alunni V, Quatrehomme G. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods. Sci Justice. 2013;53:253–60.
  • 5.   Latham K, Miller J. DNA recovery and analysis from skeletal material in modern forensic contexts. Forensic Sci Res. 2019;4:51–9.
  • 6.   Spradley MK, Jantz RL (2011) Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci 56:289– 296.
  • 7.   Adams BJ, Byrd JE (2002) Interobserver variation of selected postcranial skeletal measurements. J Forensic Sci 47(6):1193–1202.
  • 8.   Steyn M, İşcan MY (1997) Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 90(1–2):111–119.
  • 9.   Brooks ST. Skeletal age at death: the reliability of cranial and pubic age indicators. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1955 Dec;13(4):567-97.
  • 10.   Selliah P, Martino F, Cummaudo M, Indra L, Biehler-Gomez L, Campobasso C, et al. Sex estimation of skeletons in middle and late adulthood: reliability of pelvic morphological traits and long bone metrics on an Italian skeletal collection. Int J Legal Med. 2020;134:1683–90.
  • 11.   Krogman WM, Iscan MY. Skeletal age: Cranium. In: The Human skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 2nd edition. Springfield (USA): Charles C Thomas Publishers. 1986.
  • 12.   Uytterschaut HT. Sexual dimorphism in human skulls. A comparison of sexual dimorphism in different populations. Human Evolution. 1986 Jun;1:243-50.
  • 13.   Paiva LA, Segre M. Sexing the human skull through the mastoid process. Revista do Hospital das Clínicas. 2003;58:15-20.
  • 14.   Lalwani M, Yadav J, Arora A, Dubey BP. Sex identification from cranial capacity of adult human skulls. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine. 2012;34(2):128-31.
  • 15.   Sarač-Hadžihalilović A, Ajanović Z, Hasanbegović I, Šljuka S, Rakanović- Todić M, Aganović I, Prazina I, Kapo SM, Hadžiselimović R. Analysis of gender differences on pyriform aperture of human skulls using geometric morphometric method. Folia Morphologica. 2022;81(3):707-14.
  • 16.   Shanthi CH, Lokanadham S. Morphometric study on foramen magnum of human skulls. Medicine Science. 2013;2(4):792-8.
  • 17.   Sherif N, Sheta A, Ibrahim M, Kaka R, Henaidy M. Evaluation of the paranasal sinuses dimensions in sex estimation among a sample of adult Egyptians using multidetector computed tomography. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2017;11:33–9.
  • 18.   Manivasagam M. Age Estimation from Fusion of ecto cranial (Coronal, Sagittal, Lambdoid, Temporal) sutures in humans: A study in bodies during autopsy to prove/disprove ages of sutural closure used in routine practice [Internet]. [Tirunelveli (India)]: The Tamil Nadu Dr. M. G. R. Medical University, Chennai. April 2015. Available from: http:// www.repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/7546 (Accessed on 17 June 2022).
  • 19.   Rentoul E, Smith H, Editors. 1973. Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology. 13th edition. Churchill Livingstone. p80.
  • 20.   Millard, AB. Age assessment from cranial suture closure (unpublished thesis). San Marcos (Texas): Texas State University; 2011. [Internet]: Available from: https://digital. library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/4275. (Accessed on 29 June 2022).
  • 21.   Narasimhamurthy S, Kumar R, Manjunath T, Kuppast N, Umesh S, Shradha Iddalgave R. Reliability of bregma-lambda length measurements in identification of sex of skull. Sch J App Med Sci. 2015;3:1467–70.
  • 22.   Talokar S, Lade S. Sexual dimorphism of human skull by different parameters Int J Sci Res. 2015;4:614–6.
  • 23.   Rao P, Menezes T, Kanchan T, Sowmya J, Yoganarasimha K, Aswinidutt R. Estimation of stature from cranial sutures in a South Indian male population. Int J Legal Med. 2009;123:271–6.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Bhosale AA, Taware AA, Jadhav VT, et al. A pilot study to find out sexual dimorphism in human skulls using curvilinear sagittal suture length. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2023;16(3):171-176.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator


Received Accepted Published
March 25, 2023 July 05, 2023 September 30, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijfmp.0974.3383.16323.1

Keywords

Curvilinear lengthSagittal sutureSexual dimorphismIdentifi cation

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 25 August 2026, 08:37:52 (IST)


11910

Accesses

19
2646
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received March 25, 2023
Accepted July 05, 2023
Published September 30, 2023

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator


Access this article



Share