Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

A Comparative Study Between Minimal Invasive Procedure for Haemorrhoids Stapler Haemorrhoidopexy and Open Haemorrhoidectomy

M.L. Dawan,, Chetan Nivar, Aditya Agarwal, Dharmveer Jajra, Udesh Rajpurohit, Shaheen Akbar

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


New Indian Journal of Surgery 16(2):p 53-58, April - June 2025. | DOI: 10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.16225.2

How Cite This Article:

Nivar C, Dawan ML, Agarwal A, et al. A comparative study between minimal invasive procedure for haemorrhoids stapler haemorrhoidopexy and open haemorrhoidectomy. New Indian J Surg. 2025;16(2):53-58.

Timeline

Received : March 10, 2025         Accepted : May 26, 2025          Published : June 30, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Hemorrhoids are one of the most common benign anorectal problems worldwide. Surgical intervention is necessary for advanced cases. Stapler Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) and conventional emorrhoidectomy (CH) are widely used methods. This study aims to compare the efficacy of SH and CH in terms of operative time, pain, hospital stay, and complications. Aim: A Comparative study between minimal invasive procedure for haemorrhoids Stapler Haemorrhoidopexy and open haemorrhoidectomy


References

  • 1.   Riss S., Weiser F.A., Schwameis K., et al. The Prevalence of Hemorrhoids in Adults. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012; 27(2): 215-220.DOI: 10.1007/s00384-011- 1378-3.
  • 2.   Sun W.M., Read N.W. Haemorrhoids Are Associated Not with Hypertrophy of the Internal Anal Sphincter, but with Hypertension of the Anal Cushions. British Journal of Surgery, 1992; 79(6): 592-594. DOI: 10.1002/ bjs.1800790610.
  • 3.   MacRae H.M., McLeod R.S. Comparison of Hemorrhoidal Treatment Modalities. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995; 38(7): 687-694. DOI: 10.1007/BF02051463.
  • 4.   Noorchashm H., Maron D.J. Procedures for Benign Anorectal Disease. In Gowned and Gloved Surgery: Introduction to Common Procedures. WB Saunders, 2009; pp. 145–156.
  • 5.   Keighley M.R.B., Williams C.A. Surgery of the Anus, Rectum, and Colon. 3rd ed., Saunders Publications, 2008; Vol. 1, pp. 351–422. 6. Longo A. Treatment of Hemorrhoids Disease by Reduction of Mucosa and Hemorrhoidal Prolapse with a Circular Suturing Device: A New Procedure. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 1998.
  • 7.   Lim D.R., Cho D.H., Lee J.H., Moon J. H. Comparison of a Hemorrhoidectomy With Ultrasonic Scalpel Versus a Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy. Annals of Coloproctology, 2016; 32(3): 111-116. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.3.111.
  • 8.   Abo-hashem A. A., Sarhan A., Aly A. M. Harmonic Scalpel Compared with Bipolar Electro-cautery Hemorrhoidectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Surgery, 2010; 8(3): 243-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.01.003.
  • 9.   Dumlu E., Gurer A., Tokac M., et al. Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients with Grade III or IV Disease: Harmonic Scalpel Compared With Conventional Closed Technique. International Archives of Medicine, 2015. DOI: 10.3823/1674.
  • 10.   Sanchez C., Chinn B.T. Hemorrhoids. Clinical Colon and Rectal Surgery, 2011; 24(1): 5. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1279608.
  • 11.   HoY. H., Seow-Choen F., Tan M., Leong A.F. Randomized Controlled Trial of Open and Closed Haemorrhoidectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 1997; 84(12): 1729-30. DOI: 10.1002/ bjs.1800841217.
  • 12.   Riss S., Schwameis K., Mittlböck M., et al. Postoperative Pain, Risk Factors, and Patients’ Perspective on Postoperative Pain Management after Hemorrhoidectomy. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2011; 54(6): 73-79. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-010-1053-7.
  • 13.   Tariq A.M., Malla S.A., Kapoor M., et al. Comparative Study of Harmonic Scalpel Haemorrhoidectomy Versus Conventional (Milligan-Morgan) Haemorrhoidectomy. Journal of Surgical Arts, 2018; 11(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.9748/jsa.2018.04.11.
  • 14.   Sato T., Yamazaki K., Akaike J., et al. Retrospective Analysis of Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy for Rectal Varices Compared with Band Ligation. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, 2010; 3: 159-163. DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S12061.
  • 15.   Abdullah A.M., Ahmed E.M., Abuelanin R. S., Kareem A.K. Comparative Study Between Hemorrhoidectomy with Harmonic Scalpel Versus Electrocautery. The Medical Journal of Cairo University, 2021; 89(June): 535-541. DOI: 10.21608/tmju.2021.153962.
  • 16.   Bulus H., Kement M., Girgin S., et al. Comparing Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy with Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011; 15(4): 626-636. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1446-5.
  • 17.   Rosen L., Abel M., Paskin D., et al. Hemorrhoidectomy—State of the Art Techniques and Outcomes. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2005; 48(9): 1895-1901. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0071-6.
  • 18.   Gallo G., Martellucci J., Sturiale A., et al. Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): Management and Treatment of Hemorrhoidal Disease. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2020; 24(2): 145- 164. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02134-9.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest.


About this article


Cite this article

Nivar C, Dawan ML, Agarwal A, et al. A comparative study between minimal invasive procedure for haemorrhoids stapler haemorrhoidopexy and open haemorrhoidectomy. New Indian J Surg. 2025;16(2):53-58.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
March 10, 2025 May 26, 2025 June 30, 2025

DOI: 10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.16225.2

Keywords

HemorrhoidsHemorrhoidectomyExternal/InternalPostoperative PainStapler Haemorrhoidopexy

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Thursday 30 July 2026, 08:01:33 (IST)


3377

Accesses

17
295
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received March 10, 2025
Accepted May 26, 2025
Published June 30, 2025

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share