Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

To Compare the Dissection of Gallbladder by Ultrasonic Harmonic Scalpel Versus Electrocautery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Rahul Sharma, Ashok Kumar, Ravikant Maru, Parul , Kedarnat , Diwan Singh Jakhar

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



New Indian Journal of Surgery 17(3):p 109-114, July - Sept. 2026. | DOI: 10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.17326.3

How Cite This Article:

Rahul Sharma, Ashok Kumar, Ravikant Maru, et al. To Compare the Dissection of Gallbladder by Ultrasonic Harmonic Scalpel Versus Electrocautery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. New Indian J Surg. 2026; 17(3): 109-114

Timeline

Received : May 13, 2026         Accepted : June 25, 2026          Published : September 30, 2026

Abstract

The gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Common gallbladder dissection methods include monopolar electrocautery and ultrasonic harmonic scalpel. Aim: To compare harmonic scalpel and monopolar electrocautery for gallbladder dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Settings and Design: A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Materials and Methods: This study comprised 120 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Electrocautery (EC, n=60) and harmonic scalpel (HS, n=60) groups were evenly assigned. Demographics, operative length, intra-operative bleeding, complications, post-operative pain, nausea, and vomiting were documented and analysed. Statistical Analysis Used: Independent Student’s t-test, Chi-square and Mann– Whitney U test were used, with p <0.05 considered significant. Results: Both groups had similar demographics. The HS group had a considerably longer mean operational time (58.38 ± 4.43 minutes) compared to the EC group (45.31 ± 2.84 minutes, p < 0.001). The HS group had considerably decreased intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.001) and post- operative pain severity (p = 0.006). The EC group had greater intra-operative complications such gallbladder perforation and liver damage. No common bile duct injury was found in either group. Conclusion: The harmonic scalpel is a safe and effective alternative to electrocautery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with less bleeding, complications, and postoperative pain but a lengthier procedure.


References

  • 1.   Akami K., Ashish K., Singh R., et al. Comparative study of monopolar electrocautery versus harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2023; 5(6): 916–920. DOI: 10.47009/ jamp.2023.5.6.188.
  • 2.   Shylesh M.P., Bhat S., Rao S. Comparative study of monopolar electrocautery versus harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Global J Res Anal. 2017; 6(4): 153–156. https://www.doi.org/10.36106/gjra.
  • 3.   Bansal V.K., Misra M.C., Garg P., Prabhu M. A prospective randomized trial comparing harmonic scalpel with electrocautery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25(7): 2058–2064. https://doi. org/10.1089/lap.2016.0272.
  • 4.   Ulla T.Z. Comparative evaluation of monopolar electrocautery and harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Res J Med Sci. 2024; 9: 68–72.
  • 5.   Sarda D.K., Garg P.K. Prevalence and management of cholelithiasis in the population of Rajasthan: A clinical study. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2018;6(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.18535/ jmscr/v6i2.27.
  • 6.   Mahabaleshwar V., Kaman L., Iqbal J., Singh R. Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Can J Surg. 2012; 55(5): 307–311. https:// doi.org/10.1503/cjs.000411.
  • 7.   Gupta N., Sah S.K., Kumari R., Kumar S., Jaiswal P., Jha P.K. A prospective comparative study on electrocautery versus harmonic dissection of the gallbladder from the hepatic bed. Student J Health Res Afr. 2024;5(3). https:// doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v5i3.1054.
  • 8.   Ramzanali S.A.A., Zia-ul-Islam, Shah S.S.H. Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2013;25(3–4). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/25226730/.
  • 9.   Mahjoba N.K., Tahir E., Alsaffar S., Ahmad M.M. Harmonic versus electrocautery in the dissection of gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Coll Med Mosul. 2013;39(2):107–112. https://doi.org/10.33899/ mmed.2013.81304.
  • 10.   Manoj M.S., Debata P.K., Debata I., Das S.K. Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery and its outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective interventional study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2023; 17(10): PC14–PC17. https://doi. org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65310.18585.

About this article


Cite this article

Rahul Sharma, Ashok Kumar, Ravikant Maru, et al. To Compare the Dissection of Gallbladder by Ultrasonic Harmonic Scalpel Versus Electrocautery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. New Indian J Surg. 2026; 17(3): 109-114


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Received Accepted Published
May 13, 2026 June 25, 2026 September 30, 2026

DOI: 10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.17326.3

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomyHarmonic scalpeElectrocautery

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Friday 04 September 2026, 11:30:11 (IST)


4440

Accesses

5
340
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received May 13, 2026
Accepted June 25, 2026
Published September 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Access this article



Share