Abstract

Over the years, discrimination based on race, gender, disability, sexual status, or gender identity has become more prominent. While organisations and groups are making efforts to end the discrimination, constitutions and lawmakers have to play a role in overcoming this injustice. This research argues that the various challenges that vulnerable individuals face include the idea that they are seen and treated as nuisances and threats to the national values, moral order, religious beliefs, and everyday notions of gender identity. Therefore, this research aims to explore the roles constitutions can play in alleviating the sufferings of victims of discrimination. The research method adopted is the doctrinal research, involving the analysis of existing literature on the topic and applying reasoning, as well as observation principles to deduce viable solutions to the injustice. Focus was placed on reports from United States of America and other foreign countries due to their robust literature on the subject matter. This study found that the explicit inclusion of the vulnerable individuals in the constitution may have a more significant impact in overcoming the injustice of discrimination against such group. This research recommends that constitutions provide explicitly for enforcement of the rights of everyone against all forms of discrimination undermining their gender identities.

• 1.   Winant H. Race and Race Theory. Annu Rev Sociol. 2000;26:169-85.
• 2.   United Nations. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). New York: United Nations; 1979.
• 3.   Crump B. Racial Injustice in America. Ben Crump Law [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 4.   Holloway G. Changing The Narrative: How People with Disabilities Overcome Discrimination in Employment Settings [Master's thesis]. St. Paul (MN): University of St. Thomas; 2017.
• 5.   International Labour Organization. International Day of Persons with Disabilities: How disability affects labour market outcomes [Internet]. ILOSTAT; 2020 Dec 3 [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 6.   Human Rights Watch. “Everyone Wants Me Dead”: The Law, Homophobia and Alarming Human Rights Abuses in Nigeria. New York: Human Rights Watch; 2014.
• 7.   Trispiotis I, Purshouse C. ‘Conversion Therapy’ As Degrading Treatment. Oxf J Leg Stud. 2022;42(1):104-132.
• 8.   Pettigrew TF. Racial Discrimination. In: Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
• 9.   Dorius SF, Firebaugh G. Trends in Global Gender Inequality. Soc Forces. 2010;88(5):1941-68.
• 10.   Armour P, et al. Disability Saliency and Discrimination in Hiring. AEA Pap Proc. 2018;108:262-66.
• 11.   David AB. Fighting Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation. Litigation. 2007;34(1):31-35.
• 12.   BuzzFeed News. This Is How 23 Countries Feel About Transgender Rights [Internet]. 2016 Dec 29 [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 13.   BBC News. Homosexuality: The countries where it is illegal to be gay [Internet]. 2021 May 12 [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 14.   Ontario Human Rights Commission. Examples of Racial Discrimination (Fact Sheet). Toronto: OHRC; 2018.
• 15.   U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Race/Color Discrimination [Internet]. Washington (DC): EEOC; [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 16.   Selby D. 8 Facts You Should Know About Racial Injustice in the Justice System. Innocence Project [Internet]. 2021 Feb 4 [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 17.   Parekh S. Getting to the Root of Gender Inequality: Structural Injustice and Political Responsibility. Hypatia. 2011;26(4):672-89.
• 18.   UCLA Anderson Review. Age-Old Cultural Norms Dictate Gender Roles Even Today [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Aug 31
• 19.   Fadele A, Aina-Pelemo AD. Overcoming Discrimination on Grounds of Race, Disability, Gender, LGBTQIA+ in Nigeria: Role of Constitutions. Indian J Law Hum Behav. 2023;9(1):47-52.
• 20.   Vanguard News. Why unmarried female police officers are not allowed to get pregnant – Court [Internet]. 2022 Feb 21 [cited 2022 Aug 31
• 21.   Idialu EE. The Inhuman Treatment of Widows in African Communities. Curr Res J Soc Sci. 2012;4(1):6-11.
• 22.   Aina–Pelemo AD, Ejembi P. Sexual Harassment and the Law. Jos: Jos University Press; 2020.
• 23.   Aina-Pelemo AD. Sexual Harassment at Workplace: Judicial Impact in Nigeria and India. J Law Policy. 2018;4:211-225.
• 24.   Wheeler Connecticut Clearinghouse. LGBTQ Individuals [Internet]. Plainville (CT); [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 25.   American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB). The problem with LGBTQ+ underrepresentation [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 26.   Council of Europe. Discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity in Europe. 2nd ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing; 2011.
• 27.   Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), s. 1(3), 6(6)(b), 13, 34, 42.
• 28.   International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). G.A. res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316; 1966.
• 29.   Universal Declaration of Human Rights. G.A. res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc A/810 at 71; 1948.
• 30.   Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
• 31.   Constitution of India, art. 14.
• 32.   John Vallamattom & Anor v. Union of India. AIR 2003 SC 2902.
• 33.   The Guardian. Indian supreme court decriminalises homosexuality [Internet]. 2018 Sep 6 [cited 2022 Aug 31].
• 34.   Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India. AIR 2018 SC 4321.
• 35.   International IDEA. What is a Constitution? Principles and Concepts. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance; 2014.
• 36.   Malemi E. The Nigerian Constitutional Law. 3rd ed. Lagos: Princeton Publishing Co.; 2017.
• 37.   Ufomba v. INEC. [2017] 7 NWLR (Pt 1563) 1.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding