Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

A Comparative Constitutional Study of Judicial Review in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom

Rajeev Kumar Singh, Ashta Siddhi Nagar

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior 12(1):p 07-18, January-June 2026. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijlhb.2454.7107.12126.1

How Cite This Article:

Rajeev Kumar Singh, Ashta Siddhi Nagar. A Comparative Constitutional Study of Judicial Review in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Indian J Law Hum Behav 2026; 12(1): 07-18.

Timeline

Received : December 16, 2025         Accepted : January 20, 2026          Published : June 30, 2026

Abstract

This doctoral research paper conducts a comparative analysis of judicial review across India, the United States, and the United Kingdom, examining how courts ensure governmental actions comply with constitutional limits. The study traces the historical evolution and constitutional foundations in each jurisdiction: India’s explicit constitutional provisions (Articles 13, 32, 131-136, 141- 143, 226-227), the US’s implicit framework derived from Articles III and VI through judicial interpretation, and the UK’s uncodified system rooted in parliamentary sovereignty. Key findings reveal distinct scopes: India’s basic structure doctrine enables review of legislative, executive, and constitutional amendments; US review covers legislation and executive acts but not constitutional amendments; UK review focuses primarily on secondary legislation and administrative actions. The research analyses judicial review’s impact on fundamental rights protection, constitutional governance, and tensions between judicial activism and restraint across different constitutional cultures. It proposes reforms to enhance judicial accountability while maintaining the balance between judicial independence and democratic legitimacy, demonstrating judicial review’s essential yet varied role in constitutional democracies across legal traditions.


References

No records found.


Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Rajeev Kumar Singh, Ashta Siddhi Nagar. A Comparative Constitutional Study of Judicial Review in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Indian J Law Hum Behav 2026; 12(1): 07-18.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
December 16, 2025 January 20, 2026 June 30, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijlhb.2454.7107.12126.1

Keywords

Judicial ReviewConstitutional SupremacyFundamental RightsBasic Structure DoctrineParliamentary Sovereignty

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Friday 17 July 2026, 03:43:38 (IST)


807

Accesses

3
233
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received December 16, 2025
Accepted January 20, 2026
Published June 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share