Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Measuring Scholarly Literature on ‘Misinformation’, ‘Disinformation’, and ‘Fake News’

Ramakrushna Baral,, Fazlunnisa H

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Indian Journal of Library and Information Sciences 20(1):p 39-51, jan-april 2026. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijlis.0973.9548.20126.4

How Cite This Article:

Baral R, Fazlunnisa H. Measuring scholarly literature on ‘Misinformation’, ‘Disinformation’, and ‘Fake News’. Indian J Lib Inf Sci. 2026;20(1):39-51.

Timeline

Received : October 04, 2025         Accepted : November 18, 2025          Published : April 30, 2026

Abstract

Context: Thanks to the invention of the WWW and HTTP, the production and consumption of information have reached new heights, with millions of bits of information being created and shared online every second. Such an explosion of information has raised significant concerns regarding the credibility and authenticity of the information being shared and consumed. The COVID pandemic of 2020 is testimony to the effects of ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’, and ‘fake news’. Aim: It is, hence, essential to carry out studies that track the evolution and trace the trend line of scholarly literature on this phenomenon and its effects. Setting and Design: The study attempts to investigate the prolific scientific literature published in terms of countries and research areas. Methods and materials: A total of 7781 journal articles over the study period from 1993 to 2022 were studied using the Web of Science database. The study has employed VoSviewer for the mapping of the scientific iterature. Statistical analysis used: The study quantifies the chronological growth of research literature using tools such as Annual Growth Rate (AGR), Relative Growth Rate (RGR), and Doubling Time (Dt). Results: The mapping of research data indicates the trend line and growth of literature in the study area. It is found that there has been a considerable increase in the research literature published on the areas of ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’, and ‘fake news’ in recent times.


References

  • 1.   Aïmeur, E., Amri, S., & Brassard, G. (2023). Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review. In Social Network Analysis and Mining (Vol. 13, Number 1). Springer Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13278-023-01028-5
  • 2.   Al-Zaman, M. S. (2022). A Thematic Analysis of Misinformation in India during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Information and Library Review, 54(2), 128–138. https://doi.or g/10.1080/10572317.2021.1908063
  • 3.   Al-zaman, S. (2022). Prevalence and source analysis of COVID-19 misinformation in 138 countries. IFLA Journal, 48(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211041135
  • 4.   Alonso, S., Gerardo, G., Prieto, M. S., Guerrero, A. J. M., & Jiménez, C. R. (2020). The Impact of Term Fake News on the Scientific Community. Scientific Performance and Mapping in Web of Science. Social Sciences.
  • 5.   Alvarez-Galvez, J., Suarez-Lledo, V., & RojasGarcia, A. (2021). Determinants of Infodemics During Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.603603.
  • 6.   Baisley, E. (2014). Genocide and constructions of Hutu and Tutsi in radio propaganda. Race and Class, 55(3), 38–59. https://doi. org/10.1177/0306396813509194.
  • 7.   Bajwa, R. S., & Yaldram, K. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 95(2), 529–540. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-012-0839-x.
  • 8.   Bajwa, R. S., Yaldram, K., & Rafique, S. (2013). A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective. Scientometrics, 94(1), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0699-4.
  • 9.   Brooke Donald. (2016). Stanford researchers find students have trouble judging the credibility of information online. Stanford Graduate School of Education, 3–6.
  • 10.   Caceres, M. M. F., Sosa, J. P., Lawrence, J. A., Sestacovschi, C., Tidd-Johnson, A., UI Rasool, M. H., Gadamidi, V. K., Ozair, S., Pandav, K., Cuevas-Lou, C., Parrish, M., Rodriguez, I., & Fernandez, J. P. (2022). The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic. AIMS Public Health, 9(2), 262–277. https:// doi.org/10.3934/Public Health.2022018.
  • 11.   Cohut, M. (2020). 5 persistent myths about coronavirus and why they are untrue. Medical News Today. https://www. medicalnewstoday.com/articles/5-persistentmyths-about-coronavirus-and-why-they-areuntrue.
  • 12.   Dave, A. (2021). Indian doctors warn against cow dung as COVID cure. Reuters. https:// www.reuters.com/world/india/indiandoctors-warn-against-cow-dung-covidcure-2021-05-11/
  • 13.   Do Nascimento, I. J. B., Pizarro, A. B., Almeida, J. M., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Gonçalves, M. A., Björklund, M., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2022). Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 100(9), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.21.287654.
  • 14.   Dutt, Barkha (2022). To Hell and Back: Humans of Covid: Juggernaut Books.
  • 15.   Elyse Samuels. (2020). How misinformation on WhatsApp led to a mob killing in India. h t t p s : / / w w w . w a s h i n g t o n p o s t . c o m / politics/2020/02/21/how-misinformationwhatsapp-led-deathly-mob-lynching-india/
  • 16.   Farhall, K., Carson, A., Wright, S., Gibbons, A., & Lukamto, W. (2019). Political Elites’ Use of Fake News Discourse Across Communications Platforms. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4353–4375. http://ijoc.org.
  • 17.   Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., SwireThompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Political science: Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. aau2706.
  • 18.   Ha, L., Andreu Perez, L., & Ray, R. (2021). Mapping Recent Development in Scholarship on Fake News and Misinformation, 2008 to 2017: Disciplinary Contribution, Topics, and Impact. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 290–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869402.
  • 19.   Javed, S. A., & Liu, S. (2018). Predicting the research output/growth of selected countries: application of Even GM (1, 1) and NDGM models. Scientometrics, 115(1), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2586-5.
  • 20.   Maphosa, V., & Maphosa, M. (2023). Fifteen Years of Recommender Systems Research in Higher Education: Current Trends and Future Direction. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.202 3.2175106.
  • 21.   Muhammed T, S., & Mathew, S. K. (2022). The disaster of misinformation: a review of research in social media. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 13(4), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6.
  • 22.   Oladokun, B. D., Aruwa, J. E., Ottah, G. A., & Ajani, Y. A. (2024). Misinformation and Disinformation in the Era of Social Media : The Need for Fact-Checking Skills. Journal of Information and Knowledge, March. https:// doi.org/10.17821/srels/2024/v61i1/171266.
  • 23.   Patterson, T. E. (2020). Election Beat 2020: How news outlets become misinformation superspreaders. The Journalists Resource. https://journalistsresource.org/politicsand-government/news-misinformationsuperspreaders/
  • 24.   Philips, W., & Milner, R. M. (2021). A Field Guide for Navigating Polarised Speech, Conspiracy Theories, and Our Polluted Media Landscape. MIT Press. https://www.google.co.in/books/ edition/_/-ScZEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0.
  • 25.   Piper, P. (2000). Better Read That Again: Web Hoaxes and Misinformation. Seacher, 8, 40-. http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/sep00/ piper.htm
  • 26.   Sahoo, J., Sahu, S. C., & Mohanty, B. (2021). Research on fake news: An empirical analysis of selected library and information science journals. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 41(4), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.14429/ DJLIT.41.4.17168.
  • 27.   Schuetz, S. W., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Combating COVID-19 fake news on social media through fact checking: antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(4), 376–388. https:// doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1895682.
  • 28.   Verma, G., Bhardwaj, A., Aledavood, T., De Choudhury, M., & Kumar, S. (2022). Examining the impact of sharing COVID-19 misinformation online on mental health. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–9. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-022-11488-y.
  • 29.   Zhou, L., & Zhang, D. (2007). An ontologysupported misinformation model: Toward a digital misinformation library. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 37(5), 804–813. https://doi.org/10.1109/ TSMCA.2007.902648.

About this article


Cite this article

Baral R, Fazlunnisa H. Measuring scholarly literature on ‘Misinformation’, ‘Disinformation’, and ‘Fake News’. Indian J Lib Inf Sci. 2026;20(1):39-51.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Received Accepted Published
October 04, 2025 November 18, 2025 April 30, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijlis.0973.9548.20126.4

Keywords

MisinformationFake NewsAnnual Growth RateRelative Growth RateDoubling TimeScholarly Mapping

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 17 June 2026, 01:49:23 (IST)


2134

Accesses

9
436
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received October 04, 2025
Accepted November 18, 2025
Published April 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Access this article



Share