Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Indigenous Knowledge and Tribal Worldview on Forest

Digbijoy Giri

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Research in Anthropology 9(2):p 89-98, July-December 2023. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijra.2454.9118.9223.5

How Cite This Article:

Digbijoy Giri/Indigenous Knowledge and Tribal Worldview on Forest/Indian J Res Anthropol 2023;9(2):89-98.

Timeline

Received : December 11, 2023         Accepted : December 28, 2023          Published : December 30, 2023

Abstract

This durable ethnographic study explores the Indigenous knowledge of the local landscape of the Juang one of the Particular Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) of Odisha. Following an ethno-ecology method supported by the case study method, an attempt has been made to highlight the emic view of the tribal people based on their knowledge and worldview. All parts of their natural environment, like hills, streams, forests, vegetation soil type etc. are integral parts of their cultural ambience. Classifying the resources found within their lives and livelihood activities incorporates the bio-physical tenets that include the use, composition, position, and size of the objects and belief system as an inseparable part of their culture. Explanations attributed to naming the natural objects and material goods reveal that with the change in contents due to internal demands and/or external interventions, the context of livelihood changes however, even with the decline of biodiversity, the traditional knowledge remains unchanged.


References

  • 1.   Bandyapadhyay, S. 2001 Perceptual categories of Environmental Resources and their utilization. Journal of Indian Anthropological Society 36: 245-250.
  • 2.   Bose, N.K. 1928, Marriage and kinship among the Juangs, Man In India 8 (4): 233-242.
  • 3.   Conklin Harold, 1954, The relation of Hanunóo culture to the plant world. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
  • 4.   Dalton, E.T. 1872 Descriptive Ethnology of Bengal, Calcutta.
  • 5.   Elwin, V. 1948 Notes on the Juangs, Man In India 28(1–2): 1-143.
  • 6.   Fowler, Catherine S. 1977, In
  • 7.   Frake Charles, 1962, Cultural Ecology and Ethnography, American Anthropologist New Series, Vol. 64, No. 1, Part 1 (Feb., 1962), pp. 53-59.
  • 8.   Frechione, J.D. (et al.) 1989, The perception of ecological zones and Natural Resources in the Brazilion Amazon: An Ethnoecology of Lake Coari: Advance in Economic Botany 7:260-282.
  • 9.   Giri, D.B. 2002 'Juang' In Ethnographical Atlas of Tribal, Edited by P.C. Mehta, 45, Ravindra Nagar, Udaipur-313003.
  • 10.   Pike, Kenneth L, 1979, On the extension of eticemic anthropological methodology to referential units-in-context, Lembaran Pengkajian Budaya, Anthropology.
  • 11.   Patnaik, N et al. 2007, Forest Tribes of Orissa, Vol.-3, TheJuang. D.K Printworld, New Delhi.
  • 12.   Patnaik, N et al. 2015, Forest Tribes of Orissa, Vol.-4, The Bhuiyan. D.K Printworld, New Delhi.
  • 13.   Giri, Digbijoy, 2017 “Indigenous Resource Taxonomy, Knowledge and Culture”, Bookwell, New Delhi.
  • 14.   Hardersty, D.L. 1977
  • 15.   Knight, C.G. 1974
  • 16.   Mohanty, B.B. 1989, Shifting cultivation in Orissa: with a case study among the Juangs, Adivasi 26 (4) 17-26.
  • 17.   Samuells, E. A. 1956 Notes on a forest race called puttooas of Juang. Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal 25: 295-303.
  • 18.   Sarkar, Amitabha and Dasgupta, Samira, 2000, Ethno-ecology of Indian Tribes, Rawat Publications, Jaipur & New Delhi.
  • 19.   Vadya, A.P. and R. Rappaport, 1968

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Digbijoy Giri/Indigenous Knowledge and Tribal Worldview on Forest/Indian J Res Anthropol 2023;9(2):89-98.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
December 11, 2023 December 28, 2023 December 30, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijra.2454.9118.9223.5

Keywords

Bhuiyan-Juang PirhaIndigenous KnowledgeEnvironmental PerceptionEthnoecologyFolkloreIndigenous PeopleMythicNatural ResourcesNomenclature

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 21 July 2026, 17:30:59 (IST)


1160

Accesses

2
320
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received December 11, 2023
Accepted December 28, 2023
Published December 30, 2023

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share