Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Village Studies: As a Dimension of Anthropological Tradition in India

Parikshit Chakraborty

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Research in Anthropology 9(2):p 101-110, July-December 2023. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijra.2454.9118.9223.6

How Cite This Article:

Parikshit Chakraborty/Village Studies: As a Dimension of Anthropological Tradition in India/ Indian J Res Anthropol 2023;9(2):101-110.

Timeline

Received : August 04, 2023         Accepted : September 30, 2023          Published : December 30, 2023

Abstract

In India, Village occupies an essential place in the social as well as cultural landscape. Indian village had a substantial unit of diversity. In the history of Indian social sciences, village continuously treated as the basic unit of Indian society. Village studies were for long more or less the stock-in trade of social anthropologists of India. After reviewing number of literatures, it has drawn that the idea of village studies in India started in post-colonial period. Therefore, the present paper aims to illustrate the tradition of village studies in Anthropology from preindependent phase to post-independent phase.


References

  • 1.   Alexander, K. C. 2000. 'Rural Development Studies in the Eighties', in Indian Council of Social Science Research: Third Survey of Research in Sociology and Social Anthropology, Vol. II. Delhi: Manak Publications, pp.184-327.
  • 2.   Atal, Yogesh. 2003. 'The Studies of the Village in India', in Yogesh Atal. Indian Sociology from Where to Where: Footnotes to the History of the Discipline. Jaipur: Rawat Publications, pp. 159-85.
  • 3.   Baden-Powell, B.H. 1896. The Indian Village Community. London: Swan Sonnensc Company.
  • 4.   Baden-Powell, B.H. 1899. The Origin and Growth of Village Communities in India. London: Swan Sonnensc Company.
  • 5.   Beteille, A. 1996. Caste, Class and Power: Changing Patterns of Stratification in a Tanjore Village, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
  • 6.   Beteille, A. 1980. 'The Indian Village: Past and Present', in E. J. Hobsbawm, W. Kula, Ashok Mitra, K. N. Raj and Ignacy Sachs. (eds.): Peasants in History: Essays in Honour of Daniel Thorner. Calcutta: Oxford University Press, pp. 107-20.
  • 7.   Connell, John, and Lipton, Michael. 1977. Assessing Village Labour Situations in Developing Countries, Village Studies Programme, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex.
  • 8.   Dasgupta, Biplab. 1975. “A Typology of Village Socio-Economic Systems: From Indian Village Studies,” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 10, no. 33–35, pp. 1395–414.
  • 9.   Dasgupta, Biplab. 1978. Village Studies in the Third World, Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi.
  • 10.   Dube, S. C. 1955a. 'A Deccan Village', in M. N. Srinivas. (ed.). India's Villages. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, pp. 202-15.
  • 11.   Dube, S. C. 1955b. Indian Village. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • 12.   Dube, S. C. 1969. 'The Study of Indian Village Communities', in A. R. Desai. (ed.): Rural Sociology in India. Bombay: Popular Prakashan, pp. 790-95.
  • 13.   Dumont, Louis. 1959. 'Village Studies', Contributions to Indian Sociology, III: 9-39.
  • 14.   Durkheim, Emile. 1879. 'The Indian Village Community', Annee Sociologique, I: 359-63.
  • 15.   Epstein, T. Scarlett, Suryanarayana, A. P., and Thimmegowda, T. (1998), Village Voices: Forty Years of Rural Transformation in South India, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
  • 16.   Gough, Kathleen. 1989. Rural Change in Southeast India: 1950s to 1980s, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
  • 17.   Harriss, John. 2008. “Notes on Village Studies: From an Anthropological Perspective,” paper presented at the conference on “Studying Village Economies in India: A Colloquium on Methodology,” organized by the Sociological Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, Chalsa, Dec. 21–24.
  • 18.   Himanshu, Jha, Praveen, and Rodgers, Gerry (eds.) 2016. The Changing Village in India: Insights from Longitudinal Research, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
  • 19.   Hoben, Allan, and Timberg, Thomas. 1980. “Micro and Macro Data in Village India: A Note,” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 15, no. 48, pp. 2019–22.
  • 20.   Hockings, Paul. 1999. “Replication in Village-Level Studies,” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 34, no. 40, pp. 2867–74.
  • 21.   Indian Council of Social Science Research. 1974. A Survey of Research in Sociology and Social Anthropology (2 vols.). Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
  • 22.   Jayaraman, R., and Lanjouw, Peter. 1999. “The Evolution of Poverty and Inequality in Indian Villages,” The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–30.
  • 23.   Jodhka, Surinder. 1998. “From ‘Book View’ to ‘Field View’: Social Anthropological Constructions of the Indian Village,” Working Paper No. 5.
  • 24.   Jodhka, Surinder. 2002. “Nation and Village: Images of Rural India in Gandhi, Nehru and Ambedkar,” Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 37, no. 32, pp. 3343–53.
  • 25.   Majumdar, D. N. (ed.). 1960. Rural Profiles-H. Lucknow: Ethnographic and Folk - Culture Society.
  • 26.   Majumdar, D. N. 1955. (ed.). Rural Profiles-I. Lucknow: Ethnographic and Folk - Culture Society.
  • 27.   Mandelbaum, David. G. 1972. Society in India (2 vols.). Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
  • 28.   Marriott, McKim (ed.) 1955. Village India, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 29.   Mayer, Adrain C. 1960. Caste and Kinship in Central India: A Village and Its Regions. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • 30.   Mukherjee, Radhakamal. 1916. The Foundations of Indian Economics. Bombay: Longmans Green and Company.
  • 31.   Mukherjee, Ramakrishna. 1976. “The Value - Base of Social Anthropology: The Context of India in Particular,” Current Anthropology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 71–95.
  • 32.   Mukherjee, Ramkrishna. 1969. 'On Village Studies,' in A.R. Desai. (ed.): Rural Sociology in India. Bombay: Popuplar Prakashan, pp. 805-16.
  • 33.   Nagaraj, K. 2008. “Selecting a Study Village,” paper presented at the conference on “Studying Village Economies in India: A Colloquium on Methodology,” organized by the Sociological Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, Chalsa, Dec. 21–24.
  • 34.   Ramkrishna, T. 1891. Life in an Indian Village. London: T. Fisher Unwin.
  • 35.   Ranade, V. G. 1926. A Social and Economic Survey of a Konkan Village. Bombay: The Provincial Cooperative Institute of Bombay.
  • 36.   Singer, Milton. and Bernard S. Cohn. (eds.). 1968. Structure and Change in Indian Society. Chicago: Aldine Publications Company.
  • 37.   Slater, Gilbert. 1918. Economic Studies (Volume 1): Some South Indian Villages, Oxford University Press, Madras.
  • 38.   Srinivas, M. N. 1957. “Caste in Modern India,” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 529–48.
  • 39.   Srinivas, M. N. 1955a. 'Introduction', in M. N. Srinivas. (ed.). India's Villages. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, pp. 1-9.
  • 40.   Srinivas, M. N. 1955b. 'The Social Structure of a Mysore Vilage', in M. N. Srinivas. (ed.). India's Villages. Bombay: Asia Publishing House, pp. 21- 35.
  • 41.   Srinivas, M. N. 1955c. 'The Social System of a Mysore Village', in McKim Marriott. (ed.) Village India: Studies in the Little Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,pp. 1-35.
  • 42.   Vidyarthi, L. P. 1977. Rise of Anthropology in India: the rural-urban and other orientation, Vol – II. Concept Publishing Company, Delhi.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Parikshit Chakraborty/Village Studies: As a Dimension of Anthropological Tradition in India/ Indian J Res Anthropol 2023;9(2):101-110.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
August 04, 2023 September 30, 2023 December 30, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijra.2454.9118.9223.6

Keywords

Cultural LandscapeIndian SocietyVillage Studiesocial AnthropologistsPost-Colonial Period and Post-Independent Phase

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 21 July 2026, 09:40:11 (IST)


1130

Accesses

2
311
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received August 04, 2023
Accepted September 30, 2023
Published December 30, 2023

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share