Abstract

Forensic Psychology is the only field of Forensic Sciences that deals directly with live human beings and hence is a unique field in the entire Forensics. This field explores brain-mind interactions and how these interactions give birth to various crimes. In India more emphasis is given to scientific techniques such as test for Detection of Deception or Investigating interviewing and Psychological Evaluations which are mostly conducted in Forensic Laboratories and mostly in Criminal Investigations. However, these psychological tools for Investigation can be used even in Corporate crimes or even by Vigilance Department for their internal investigations and can be extremely crucial. This study highlights the application of Forensic Psychological Investigations in Corporates through a single case study and further discusses the necessity of these Psychological Investigations for Corporates Internal Investigations. conclusions: It was concluded that titanium is already present during the manufacturing of rexine and paint therefore, the nanoparticle coating of TiO2 doesn’t create a large difference. Besides, there was a significant difference in

• 1.   Committee for Revision of the Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology. Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists [Internet]. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2011 [cited 2011
• 2.   Joshi A. Corporate crimes: an introduction. SSRN Electron J [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2012 Sep 18].
• 3.   Joseph S, Puranik DA, Irani N, Shinde NM, Malve M, Krishnamurthy R. Scope and application of psychological evaluation in forensic cases. In: Proceedings of XVIII All India Forensic Science Conference; 2007; Kolkata. p. 439-44.
• 4.   Puranik DA, Paul P. Forensic psychological techniques and its evidentiary value in Indian courts. J Contemp Psychol. 2014:3-10.
• 5.   Yadav A. Brain electrical oscillation signature profiling and lie-detection: a normative study. [Place unknown]: [Publisher unknown]; 2014.
• 6.   Gougler M, Nelson R, Handler M, Krapohl D, Shaw P, Bierman L. Meta-analytical survey of criterion accuracy of validated polygraph techniques [Internet]. American Polygraph Association; 2011 [cited 2015].
• 7.   National Research Council. The polygraph and lie detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2003.
• 8.   Hogan Lovells. Deceptive or effective? Polygraph testing in the workplace [Internet]. Hogan Lovells; 2014 Apr [cited 2014 Apr].
• 9.   Selvi & Ors v. State of Karnataka. Criminal Appeal No. 1267 of 2004. Supreme Court of India. 2010.
• 10.   Van Der Sleen J. A structured model for investigative interviewing of suspects. In: Bull R, Valentine T, Williamson T, editors. Handbook of Psychology of Investigative Interviewing: Current Developments and Future Directions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 35-51.
• 11.   Hood MB, Hoffman LJ. Current state of interview and interrogation [Internet]. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 6].
• 12.   Hoffman CD. Investigative interviewing: strategies and techniques [Internet]. International Foundation for Protection Officers; 2005 [cited 2005Walters MA, Brown R, Wiedlitzka S. Causes and motivations of hate crimes. Research Report 102 [Internet]. Equality and Human Rights Commission; 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 21].
• 13.   Abdullah A, Marican S. The effects of big-five personality traits on deviant behavior. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016;219:19-25.
• 14.   Dullas AR, Yncierto KD, Labiano MA, Marcelo JC. Determinants of a variety of deviant behaviors: an analysis of family satisfaction, personality traits, and their relationship to deviant behaviors among Filipino adolescents. Front Psychol. 2021;12:645126.
• 15.   Ayar A, Lotfi Y, Nooraee E. The effects of social factors on committing crimes: a case study of Darehshahr Prison, Iran. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;35:70–82