Abstract

Introduction: Globally, ensuring social inclusion for individuals with disabilities requires a comprehensive strategy that involves active cooperation among health, socialwelfare, rural andurbandevelopment, and legal fields. This approach highlights the significance of community social participation. Despite the recognized importance of social engagement, there is limited information available about thesocialparticipationof thisdemographicandthefactorsthat in uence it. Consequently, the objective of this scoping review is to examine the existing literatureonsocialparticipationanditsdeterminantsspecificallyforindividuals with locomotor disabilities. It also aims to identify any gaps in the current research, indicating where additional studies are needed to enhance support quality and social involvement for this population. Methods: This scoping review will follow the methodological framework for scoping reviews outlined by Arksey & O’Malley and Levac. The study will involve searching three electronic databases: MEDLINE, SPORTD iscus, and grey literature. The scope of the search will encompass studies published in English from the establishment of each database up to the current date. The reference lists of all included articles ite rature, generating insights that will guide future research and inform policy decisions. The results of this study will assist in identifying priority areas for individuals with locomotor disabilities.

• 1.   World Health Organization (WHO), 2001, International classi𿿿cation of functioning, disability and health, WHO, Geneva.
• 2.   Awasthi A., Pandey C.M., Dubey M., Rastogi S. Trends, prospects and deprivation index of disability in India: Evidences from census 2001 and 2011. Disabil Health J. 2017 Apr; 10(2): 247256. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Nov 12. PMID: 27876288.
• 3.   Pattnaik Sweta, Murmu Jogesh, Agrawal Ritik, Rehman Tanveer, Kanungo Srikanta, Pati Sanghamitra. Prevalence, pattern and determinants of disabilities in India: Insights from NFHS-5; Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 11, 2023 (URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/ articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1036499)
• 4.   Kumar, S., Pradhan, M.R. Self-rated health status and its correlates among the elderly in India. J Public Health (Berl.) 27, 291–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-018-0960-2
• 5.   Hairi N.N., Bulgiba A., Cumming R.G., Naganathan V., Mudla I. Prevalence and correlates of physical disability and functional limitation among community dwelling older people in rural Malaysia, a middle income country. BMC Public Health. 2010 Aug 18; 10: 492. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-492. PMID: 20716377; PMCID: PMC2933720.
• 6.   Raina P., Gilsing A., Mayhew A.J., Sohel N, vandenHeuvelE.,Grif𿿿thLE.Individualand population level impact of chronic conditions on functional disability in older adults. PLoS One. 2020 Feb 20; 15(2): e0229160. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0229160. PMID: 32078637; PMCID: PMC7032687.
• 7.   Mahmud I., Clarke L., Ploubidis G.B. Sociodemographic determinants of the severity of locomotor disability among adults in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study, December 2010-February 2011. Arch Public Health. 2017 Nov 20; 75: 47. doi: 10.1186/s13690-017-0217-5. PMID: 29181151; PMCID: PMC5694906. 139.
• 8.   Padhyegurjar M.S. Factors affecting treatment seeking behaviour of individuals with locomotor disabilities. National Journal of Medical Research. 2012 Jun 30; 2(02): 145-8.
• 9.   Groce N., Trani J. Disability and the millennium development goals. United Nations Publication. 2011.
• 10.   Ganle J.K., Baatiema L., Quansah R., DansoAppiah A. Barriers facing persons with disability in accessing sexual and reproductive health services in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12; 15(10): e0238585. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0238585. PMID: 33044966; PMCID: PMC7549766.
• 11.   Dandona R., Pandey A., George S., Kumar G.A., Dandona L. India’s disability estimates: Limitations and way forward. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6; 14(9): e0222159. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0222159. PMID: 31491011; PMCID: PMC6730860.
• 12.   Munn, Z., Micah, D.J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1–7. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
• 13.   Hilary Arksey & Lisa O’Malley (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8:1, 19-32, DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
• 14.   Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J.P., Wilson, K., Kenny, M., Warren, R., Wilson, C., Stelfox, H.T., & Straus, S.E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
• 15.   Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D.J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M.G., Garritty, C.,…Straus, S.E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi. org/10.7326/M18–085

Data Sharing Statement

Funding