Mamta Rani Assistant Librarian, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Central Library, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India
Rishabh Kumar Jain Professional Assistant, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Central Library, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India
Shiva Kanaujia Sukula Deputy Librarian, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Central Library, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-110067, India
Nageswara Rao Kondamudi Assistant Librarian, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Central Library, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-11006, India
Address for correspondence: Nageswara Rao Kondamudi, Assistant Librarian, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Central Library, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi-11006, India E-mail: Nageswararao.kondamudi@gmail.com
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt,
and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes
only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Rani M, Jain RK, Sukula SK, Kondamudi NR, Pragati. Comprehending the print books and e-books preferences: comparing the contrasts. Indian J Lib Inf Sci. 2024;18(1):41-50.
Timeline
Received : December 30, 2023
Accepted : February 17, 2024
Published : April 06, 2024
Abstract
The evolution of literature consumption has witnessed a paradigm shift between print books and e-books, shaping the reading landscape. This paper explores the coexistence and impact of both formats on readership habits and preferences. It scrutinizes the tangible allure of print books, emphasizing sensory experiences and nostalgic sentiments associated with physical copies. In contrast, the paper delves into the convenience and accessibility of e-books, analyzing the role of digital platforms in democratizing literature. The article intends to described and shed light on the ongoing discourse between traditional and digital reading.
References
1. Kumar, S., & Gaur, R. (2019). Collection development policies and management for books in management libraries. KIIT Journal of Library and Information Management, 6(1), 71. https://doi. org/10.5958/2455-8060.2019.00010.7.
2. Pandey, U. S., & Sukula, S. K. (2019). Preference of Electronic Over Print: A Case Study among Scientists and Research Scholars of IGIB, India. KIIT Journal of Library and Information Management, 6(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.5958/2455- 8060.2019.00007.7
3. Piramanayagam, S. K., & Seal, P. P. (2020). The Choice between EBooks and Printed Books: A study among hospitality and tourism educators and learners. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2020. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=7259&context=libphilprac.
4. P, Neelima., & Sunder, Ravi R. (2016). Comparison between e-books and printed material for effective understanding of subject by the medical and dental students. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research, 5(4), 426–432.
5. Tveit, Å. K., & Mangen, A. (2014). A joker in the class: Teenage readers’ attitudes and preferences to reading on different devices. Library & Information Science Research, 36(3–4), 179–184. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.001.
6. Jones, T., & Brown, C. C. (2011). Reading Engagement: A Comparison between E-Books and Traditional Print Books in an Elementary Classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 4(2), 5–22. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/ED522678.pdf.
7. www.lib.jnu.ac.in.
8. Spjeldnæs, K., & Karlsen, F. (2022). How digital devices transform literary reading: The impact of e-books, audiobooks, and online life on reading habits. New Media & Society, 146144482211261. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221126168.
9. OECD (2012),
10. Luo, Y., Xiao, Y., Ma, Y., & Li, C. (2021). Discussion of students’ e-book reading intention with the integration of the theory of planned Behavior and Technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2021.752188.
11. Zhang, T., Niu, X., & Promann, M. (2017). Assessing the user experience of E-Books in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 78(5). https://doi. org/10.5860/crl.78.5.578.
12. Walton, E. W. (2007). Faculty and Student Perceptions of Using E-Books in a Small Academic Institution. https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/ handle/11213/17007/walton_facultyandstudentpe rceptionsofusinge-books.pdf?sequence=1.
14. Zhang, Y., & Kudva, S. (2013). Ebooks vs. print books: Readers’ choices and preferences across contexts. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001106.
15. Jeong, H. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390–408. https://doi. org/10.1108/02640471211241663.
16. Carreiro, E. (2010). Electronic Books: How Digital Devices and Supplementary New Technologies are Changing the Face of the Publishing Industry. Publishing Research Quarterly, 26(4), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-010-9178-z.
17. Kumbhar, R. (2018). Trends in e-book research. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 38(3), 162. https://doi.org/10.14429/ djlit.38.3.12382.
18. Potnis, D., Deosthali, K., Zhu, X., & McCusker, R. (2018). Factors influencing undergraduate use of e-books: A mixed methods study. Library & Information Science Research, 40(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.06.001.
19. Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Shubeck, K. T., Hu, X., Huang, R., & Zhu, L. (2021). Teachers’ adoption of an open and interactive e-book for teaching K-12 students Artificial Intelligence: a mixed methods inquiry. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1). https://doi. org/10.1186/s40561-021-00176-5.
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
Information not provided.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Rani M, Jain RK, Sukula SK, Kondamudi NR, Pragati. Comprehending the print books and e-books preferences: comparing the contrasts. Indian J Lib Inf Sci. 2024;18(1):41-50.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt,
and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes
only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt,
and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes
only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.