Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparative Studies on Degradation of Forensic Biological Fluids Recovered from Crime Scene

Jaskaran Singh, Aswathi Anurudhan, Anshu Nanda, Karan Singh, Ekampreet Kaur, Jaskaran Singh

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 14(3(Special Issue)):p 567-573, July - September 2021. | DOI: 10.21088/ijfmp.0974.3383.14321.19

How Cite This Article:

Aswathi A. Comparative studies on degradation of forensic biological fluids recovered from crime scene. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2021;14(3 Special):567-73.

Timeline

Received : July 02, 2021         Accepted : July 20, 2021          Published : September 30, 2021

Abstract

context: Evidence plays a crucial role in the forensic investigation in solving criminal cases. This evidence should be properly collected and preserved to avoid degradation and loss of evidential value. Hence, this paper describes the experimental study of collected and degraded biological fluids which can be recovered from the crime scene. aims: The study aims to assess the microbial growth on different biological fluids recovered from the crime scenes in percolation with varied temperature durations. settings and design: An experimental setup was designed to study the different biological fluids and their variation of impact on different conditions like type of sample, temperature differences and time of exposure. method and materials: Biological fluids such as saliva, urine, semen and vomit were collected and used for the study. The identification procedure of microorganisms and extent of degradation was studied by means of physical analysis, bacterial culture, fungal culture, staining for bacteria and fungus, and biochemical testing. Followed by assessment of collected samples inoculated with cotton cloth piece with specified time interval and temperatures. results: Candida albicans and Escherichia coli show maximum profuse growth in inoculated urine samples exposed to temperature 37°C with the time interval of 7 to 27 hours and 20-25°C with time interval of 48 hours. Likewise, Pseudomonas aeruginosa shows maximum growth in inoculated saliva samples exposed to temperature ranging from 20-37°C with time interval of 40 hours. Furthermore, the micrococcus mucillogens, proteus vulgaris and streptococcus pneumoniae show maximum growth in inoculated vomit samples exposed to temperature ranging from 20-37°C with time interval of 7-27 hours. Lastly, Micrococcus mucillogens shows maximum growth in inoculated semen sample exposed to temperature ranging 20-37°C with time interval of 48 hrs. conclusion: Forensic biological samples are more susceptible to the contamination by the growth of microorganism because of the nutritive substances present in each fluid. Since compositions of each biological fluid are different, therefore types of microbes growing and their effect on samples will also be different leading to destruction of forensic biological fluid samples. This study reveals the determination of microbes such as a Candida albicans, Escherichia Coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, micrococcus mucillogens, proteus vulgaris and streptococcus pneumoniae in urine, saliva, vomit and semen samples. Under ambient-conditions of high temperature and with specific time durations, the growth of microbes was found to be rapid. It is also to be concluded that temperature plays a major role in the preserving the integrity of samples, at high temperatures for more time, the samples will get dry and minimal amount of microorganism will grow. key messages: Detection and determination of varied microbial growth on different biological fluids of forensic importance provide prudent information to forensic experts for combating the loss of evidential value for trials and for maintaining proper chain of custody. Hence, the study aids forensic experts to collect and preserve biological fluids with in specific time duration and temperature conditions.


References

  • 1.   Balk C. Reducing contamination in forensic science. Themis. 2015;3(1):12.
  • 2.   Banaji N. Ananthanarayan. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013;31(4):423-4.
  • 3.   Dash HR, Das S. Microbial degradation of forensic samples of biological origin: potential threat to human DNA typing. Mol Biotechnol. 2018;60(2):141-53.
  • 4.   James SH, Nordby JJ. Forensic science: an introduction to scientific and investigative techniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2002.
  • 5.   Jose RJ. Book Review-Howard Gest. Microbes: An invisible Universe. [Journal information missing in source].
  • 6.   Lee HC, Ladd C. Preservation and collection of biological evidence. Croat Med J. 2001;42(3):225-8.
  • 7.   Lin MH, Jones DF, Fleming R. Transcriptomic analysis of degraded forensic body fluids. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015;17:35-42.
  • 8.   Lyman MD. Criminal investigation: The art and the science. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2001.
  • 9.   Manoharachary C, Tilak KV, Mallaiah KV, Kunwar IK. Mycology and microbiology: a textbook for UG and PG courses. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers; 2016.
  • 10.   Ogdur M, Cakan H, Cevik FE. Investigation of the microorganisms decaying blood evidences. Med Sci. 2018;7(1):173-7.
  • 11.   Poorabbas B, Mardaneh J, Rezaei Z, Kalani M, Pouladfar G, Alami MH, et al. Nosocomial Infections: Multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative rods isolated from blood and other sterile body fluids in Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2015;7(3):127-8.
  • 12.   Saferstein R. Criminalistics: An introduction to forensic science. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007.
  • 13.   Tortora GJ, Funke BR, Case CL, Weber D, Bair W. Microbiology: An introduction. San Francisco (CA): Benjamin Cummings; 2004.
  • 14.   Van Oorschot RA, Gutowski SJ, Robinson SL, Hedley JA, Andrew IR. HUMTH01 validation studies: effect of substrate, environment, and mixtures. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41(1):142-5.
  • 15.   Willey J, Sherwood L, Woolverton C. Prescott’s principles of microbiology. London: McGraw-Hill; 2009.

About this article


Cite this article

Aswathi A. Comparative studies on degradation of forensic biological fluids recovered from crime scene. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol. 2021;14(3 Special):567-73.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
July 02, 2021 July 20, 2021 September 30, 2021

DOI: 10.21088/ijfmp.0974.3383.14321.19

Keywords

biological fluidsbacterial culturebiochemical tests

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 08 July 2026, 05:35:47 (IST)


7722

Accesses

6
2137
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received July 02, 2021
Accepted July 20, 2021
Published September 30, 2021

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share