Abstract

The widespread adaptation of the internet has integrated it into the daily routines of a vast majority of individuals for various transactions. Correspondingly, the user base of the internet has experienced significant growth, paralleled by a rise in cybercrimes. Cybercrime, executed through computers and networks, poses a persistent and escalating threat across professional and personal fields. The arising of the internet has transformed traditional crimes into new forms. This research aims to raise awareness about contemporary cybercrimes and promote heightened cybersecurity measures. Furthermore, it endeavours to examine the levels of computer crime alertness among inter web users of various age groups and educational backgrounds. Utilizing a Linear predictive model, this study analyses both objectives. The findings reveal a correlation between respondents’ age groups and educational qualifications. Therefore, it is incumbent upon all internet users to remain vigilant regarding cybercrime and cybersecurity, as well as to actively foster awareness among others.

• 1.   Bessy-Roland, Y., Boumezoued, A., & Hillairet, C. (2021). Multivariate Hawkes process for cyber insurance. Annals of Actuarial Science, 15(1), 14–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1748499520000155
• 2.   CERT-In. (2021). Cyber Security Incidents Report. Retrieved from https://www.cert-in.org.in
• 3.   DataReportal. (2023). Global Digital Overview. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com
• 4.   Eling, M. (2020). Cyber risk research in business and actuarial science. European Actuarial Journal, 10(2), 303–333. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13385-020-00234-0
• 5.   Johnson, R. (2021). India logs 1 cybercrime every 10 minutes. The Times of India. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com
• 6.   Kilincer, I.F., Ertam, F., & Sengur, A. (2021). Machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection: Datasets and comparative study. Computer Networks, 188, 107840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107840
• 7.   Khraisat, A., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2019). Survey of intrusion detection systems: Techniques, datasets and challenges. Cybersecurity, 2(1), 1–22. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s42400-019-0038-7
• 8.   Kruse, C.S., Frederick, B., Jacobson, T., & Monticone, D.K. (2017). Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technology and Health Care, 25(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3233/ THC-161263
• 9.   Lee, S., Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, H., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2020). IMPACT: Impersonation attack detection via edge computing using deep autoencoder and feature abstraction. IEEE Access, 8, 65520–65529. https://doi. org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985604
• 10.   Loukas, G., Gan, D., & Vuong, T. (2013). A review of cyber threats and defence approaches in emergency management. Future Internet, 5(2), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ fi5020205
• 11.   Mokha, A.J. (2017). A study on awareness of cyber-crime and security. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(4), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321- 5828.2017.00067.5
• 12.   National Crime Records Bureau. (2023). Crime in India 2022. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Retrieved from https:// ncrb.gov.in
• 13.   Nurse, J.R.C., Axon, L., Erola, A., Agrafiotis, I., Goldsmith, M., & Creese, S. (2020, June). The data that drives cyber insurance: A study into the underwriting and claims processes. In 2020 International Conference on Cyber Situational Awareness, Data Analytics and Assessment (CyberSA) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi. org/10.1109/CyberSA49311.2020.9139638
• 14.   Romanosky, S., Ablon, L., Kuehn, A., & Jones, T. (2019). Content analysis of cyber insurance policies: How do carriers price cyber risk? Journal of Cybersecurity, 5(1), tyz002. https:// doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyz002
• 15.   Symantec. (2018). Internet Security Threat Report, Volume 23. Retrieved from https:// www.broadcom.com
• 16.   Ulven, J.B., & Wangen, G. (2021). A systematic review of cybersecurity risks in higher education. Future Internet, 13(2), 39. https:// doi.org/10.3390/fi13020039
• 17.   Zheng, M., Robbins, H., Chai, Z., Thapa, P., & Moore, T. (2018). Cybersecurity research datasets: Taxonomy and empirical analysis. In 11th USENIX Workshop on Cyber Security Experimentation and Test (CSET 18). USENIX Association. https://www.usenix.org/ conference/cset18/presentation/zheng 18. http://www.ncrb.nic.in/

Data Sharing Statement

Funding