Abstract

Context: The identification of the deceased is essential to the forensic investigation and Sex is one of the most important characteristics that may be used to determine identity. The characteristics of the foramen magnum, according to research, are useful in determining gender. Aims: To compare Foramen Magnum measurements between Male and Female in autopsy cases. Settings and Design: This study is a Cross sectional analytical study was conducted at the medicolegal center of a Tertiary Care Hospital of Western Maharashtra. Methods and Material: The study used a sample of 90 autopsy cases (45 males and 45 females) from the mortuary of a tertiary care hospital in Western Maharashtra, India. The sagittal and transverse diameters of the foramen magnum were measured using a divider and sliding vernier calliper. Results: The results of the study showed that the transverse diameter of the foramen magnum was significantly larger in males than females (p < 0.0001), while there was no significant difference in the sagittal diameter between the two genders (p = 0.11). Conclusions: The study concludes that the transverse diameter of the foramen magnum is a useful parameter for sex determination in forensic investigations.

• 1.   Reddy KSN. The essentials of forensic medicine and toxicology. 34th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2017.
• 2.   Gapert R, Black S, Last J. Sex determination from the foramen magnum: discriminant function analysis in an eighteenth and nineteenth century British sample. Int J Legal Med. 2009 Jan;123(1):25–33.
• 3.   Robinson MS, Bidmos MA. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Apr 15;186(1-3):86.e1–86.e7.
• 4.   Uthman AT, Al-Rawi NH, Al-Timimi JF. Evaluation of foramen magnum in gender determination using helical CT scanning. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012 Mar 1;41(3):197–202.
• 5.   Aghakhani K, Kazemzadeh N, Ghafurian F, Soltani B, Soltani S. Gender determination using diagnostic values of foramen magnum. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med. 2016 Jan 1;6(1):29–35.
• 6.   Loyal P, Ongeti K, Pulei A, Mandela P, Ogeng’o J. Gender related patterns in the shape and dimensions of the foramen magnum in an adult Kenyan population. Anat J Afr. 2013;2(2):138–41.
• 7.   Zaidi SH, Dayal SS. Variations in the shape of foramen magnum in Indian skulls. Anat Anz. 1988 Jan 1;167(4):338–40.
• 8.   Gruber P, Henneberg M, Böni T, Rühli FJ. Variability of human foramen magnum size. Anat Rec A: Adv Integr Anat Evol Biol. 2009 Nov;292(11):1713–9.
• 9.   Holland TD. Sex determination of fragmentary crania by analysis of the cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986 Jun;70(2):203–8.
• 10.   Barut NR, Kale AN, Turan Suslu HK, Ozturk A, Bozbuga M, Sahinoglu K. Evaluation of the bony landmarks in transcondylar approach. Br J Neurosurg. 2009 Jan 1;23(3):276–81.
• 11.   Furtado SV, Thakre DJ, Venkatesh PK, Reddy K, Hegde AS. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum dimensions and intracranial volume in pediatric Chiari I malformation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010 Feb;152(2):221–7.
• 12.   Howale DS, Bathija A, Gupta S, Pandit DP. Correlation between cranial index and foramen magnum index in human dried skulls. GJRA. 2014;3(1):3–6.
• 13.   Catalina-Herrera CJ. Study of the anatomic metric values of the foramen magnum and its relation to sex. Cells Tissues Organs. 1987 Jul 15;130(4):344–7.
• 14.   Murshed KA, Çiçekcibaşi AE, Tuncer I. Morphometric evaluation of the foramen magnum and variations in its shape: a study on computerized tomographic images of normal adults. Turk J Med Sci. 2003;33(5):301–6.
• 15.   Manoel C, Prado FB, Caria PH, Groppo FC. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in human skulls of Brazilian individuals: its relation to gender. J Morphol Sci. 2017 Jan 16;26(2):e0.
• 16.   Babu YR, Kanchan T, Attiku Y, Dixit PN, Kotian MS. Sex estimation from foramen magnum dimensions in an Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2012 Apr 1;19(3):162–7.
• 17.   Radhakrishna SK, Shivarama CH, Ramakrishna A, Bhagya B. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum for sex determination in South Indian population. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2012 Mar;2(1):20–2.
• 18.   Jain SK, Choudhary AK, Mishra P. Morphometric evaluation of foramen magnum for sex determination in a documented north Indian sample. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013 Oct 2;2(42):8093–8.
• 19.   Nijagunappa BS. Determination of sex using morphometry of foramen magnum in South Indian population. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2016;3(43):147–9.
• 20.   Tambawala SS, Karjodkar FR, Sansare K, Prakash N, Dora AC. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Nov 1;44:29–34.
• 21.   Srinivasulu K, Bairagi K, Sowmiya K. Gender prediction: anthropometric study of mastoid process and foramen magnum. J Anat Soc India. 2018;4(1):55–8.
• 22.   Gargi V, Ravi PS, Malik S, Nagaraju K, Goel S, Gupta S. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum between two different groups of Indian population: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography study. J Forensic Sci Med. 2018 Jul 1;4(3):150–5.
• 23.   Kulshrestha P. Sex determination from foramen magnum measurements in population of Uttar Pradesh. Int J Med Res Prof. 2017;3(4):273–5.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding