Full Text (PDF)
New Indian Journal of Surgery 15(1):p 37-41, January - March 2024. | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.15124.6
Case Report
A Comparative Study of Early Versus Delayed Ileostomy Closure Following Bowel Surgery
Manohar L. Dawan, Inderjeet null, Alankar Sharma, Abhishek Chhabra, Sunder kishore, Sanjay Lodha
Author Information
Licence:
Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
New Indian Journal of Surgery 15(1):p 37-41, January - March 2024. | DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.15124.6
How Cite This Article:
Inderjeet, Sharma A, Dawan ML, et al. A comparative study of early versus delayed ileostomy closure following bowel surgery. New Indian J Surg. 2024;15(3):37-41.Timeline
Received : December 11, 2023
Accepted : February 01, 2024
Published : March 24, 2024
Abstract
Introduction: Diversion stoma is very common in surgical practice. Aim: To compare the complications following early versus delayed ileostomy closure following bowel surgeries. Methods: This was a Hospital based comparative study on 112 patients undergoing ileostoma closure following bowel surgery from, March 2023 to February 2024 at Department of Surgery, S.P. Medical College and P.B.M Hospital, Bikaner. Patients of each gender with age >18 years, temporary loop ileostomy and temporary double barrel ileostomy of any aetiology, medically and mentally fit to undergo early stoma closure were included. Results: Mean age of group A (Early stoma closure) was 41.54±16.56 and group B (Delayed stoma closure) was 47.6±16.13. (p=0.066). Out of total 37 patients of Group A maximum 16 (43.24%) patients had intestinal perforation, as indication of stoma creation, whereas in Group B maximum 37 (49.33%) patients had intestinal perforation, as indication of stoma creation. (p>0.05). Mean time operative time for stoma closure of group A was 71.16±5.05 and group B was 75.70±7.73. (p<0.001). In Group A, 2 (5.40%) patients died whereas 6(8%) died in group B. Conclusion: it is preffered to EARLY STOMA CLOSURE as per patients fitness for stoma closure over unnecessarily DELAYED.
References
- 1. Chand M, Nash GF, Talbot RW. Timely closure of loop ileostomy following anterior resection for rectal cancer. European journal of cancer care. 2008 Nov;17(6):611-5.
- 2. Chang MZ, Tsai CC, Hung GU, Lin WY. Tc-99m (V)-DMSA in wound infection after closure of an ileostomy. AnnNucl Med. 2000;19:733–6.
- 3. Velmahos GC, Degiannis E, Wells M, Souter I, Saadia R. Early closure of colostomies in trauma patients-a prospective randomized trial. Surgery. 1995;118:815–20.
- 4. Robertson JP, Puckett J, Vather R, Jaung R, Bissett I. Early closure of temporary loop ileostomies: A systematic review. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2015;61:50–7.
- 5. O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME. Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1216-20.
- 6. Mala T, Nesbakken A. Morbidity related to the use of a protective stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:785-8.
- 7. Rathnayake MM, Kumarage SK, Wijesuriya SR, Munasinghe BN, Ariyaratne MH, Deen KI. Complications of loop ileostomy and ileostomy closure and their implications for extended enterostomal therapy: A prospective clinical study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:1118-21.
- 8. Giannakopoulos GF, Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJ, Cuesta MA. Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:609-12.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
Information Not Provided
About this article
Cite this article
Inderjeet, Sharma A, Dawan ML, et al. A comparative study of early versus delayed ileostomy closure following bowel surgery. New Indian J Surg. 2024;15(3):37-41.
Licence:
Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
| Received | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|
| December 11, 2023 | February 01, 2024 | March 24, 2024 |
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.15124.6
Keywords
Early Stoma ClosureDelayed Stoma ClosureIleostomy ClosureSearch for Similar Articles
Similar Articles
- Laparoscopy-Guided Bilateral Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Bloc...
- Recognizing the Columnar Cell Subtype of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Rep...
- Randomized Controlled Study To Compare Intraperitoneal Plus Port-Site Instillat...
- Single Preoperative Dose Versus Conventional Multidose Antibiotic Prophylaxis In...
- To Compare the Dissection of Gallbladder by Ultrasonic Harmonic Scalpel Versus...
Article Level Metrics
Last UpdatedTuesday 29 September 2026, 15:42:09 (IST)
5241
Accesses
13
437
00
Citations
NA
NA
NA
Download citation
Article Keywords
Keyword Highlighting
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
Timeline
| Received | December 11, 2023 |
| Accepted | February 01, 2024 |
| Published | March 24, 2024 |
licence
Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
