Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

To Compare the Effectiveness of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy versus Mirror Therapy along with Conventional Therapy to Improve Hand Function Acute and Sub-Acute Stroke Patient

Niraj Kumar , Apoorva Joshi1 , Tarang Srivastava2 , Niraj Kumar3

Author Information

Licence:




Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal 15(2):p 51-62, APRIL-JUNE 2022. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/potj.0974.5777.15222.1

How Cite This Article:

Apoova Joshi, Tarang Srivastava, Niraj Kumar/To Compare the Effectiveness of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy versus Mirror Therapy along with Conventional Therapy to Improve Hand Function Acute and Sub-Acute Stroke Patient/Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal. 2022;15(2): 51-62.


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of modified constraint induced movement therapy versus mirror therapy  along with conventional therapy on hand rehabilitation in patients with acute and sub-acute stroke. Methodology Design: Comparative study Setting: OPD and IPD of SMIH Patel Nagar, Dehradun (UK). Participants: 30 acute and sub-acute stroke patients were included in this study and randomly divided into  2 groups 15 in each i.e. mCIMT along with conventional therapy(group A) and MT along with conventional  therapy(group B). Intervention: 30 subjects who were diagnosed with stroke onset <6 week were selected according to the inclusion  criteria. Hand function and functional ability was evaluated with the help of w/h FMUE and ARAT scores. The  subjects perform exercises in each group along with conventional therapy for 45 minutes 6 days per week for a  consecutive 4 weeks. Along with daily therapy session constraining of less affected upper extremity with a mitt was  done in group A patients. The post intervention data was compared with pre intervention data and improvement  in the hand function was measured. Outcome Measures: w/h Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (sub scale B & C of FMUE) Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Result: Data was analyzed by using paired t- test. Pre and post score were taken via w/h FMUE and ARAT. P  value <0.05. Conclusion: Modified constraint induced movement therapy and Mirror therapy along with conventional  therapy both showed improvement in hand functions on acute and sub-acute stroke patient. But Modified constraint  induced movement therapy along with conventional therapy showed more improvement in reaching forward,  grasping, manipulating objects and also improves other fine motor functions of the hand after 4 weeks of therapy. Keywords: Modified constraint induced movement therapy; Mirror therapy; Acute & sub-acute stroke; w/h  FMUE; Action Research Arm Test; Hemiparesis.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article

Apoova Joshi, Tarang Srivastava, Niraj Kumar/To Compare the Effectiveness of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy versus Mirror Therapy along with Conventional Therapy to Improve Hand Function Acute and Sub-Acute Stroke Patient/Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal. 2022;15(2): 51-62.


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/potj.0974.5777.15222.1

Keywords


Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 28 July 2026, 22:22:54 (IST)


1957

Accesses

4
425
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share