Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

The Permission to Rape: Implications of Exception 2 to Section 375, IPC 1860

Kushal Singla

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Indian Journal of Law and Human Behavior 1(1):p 47-54, Jan-Jun 2015. | DOI: na

How Cite This Article:

na

Timeline

Received : February 01, 2015         Accepted : February 20, 2015          Published : June 30, 2015

Abstract

The following article is an analysis of Exception 2 to Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The provision is an exception clause to Section 375 of the IPC, 1860 which deals with the offence of rape and has been lately amended by the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 2013. While the provision is exhaustive and explanatory in detail, it gives a nod to and exempts marital rape. It states expressly that sexual intercourse by a man with his wife, who is not 15 years of age, is not rape. The provision is contradictory to not only its very own section but also to a number of other laws. Firstly, it allows for a man to rape his own wife. Secondly, it technically reduces the age of consent for a married woman, where in turn it also implies that there is no requirement of consent of a married woman. It is also not seen as criminal under the laws relating to domestic violence. There is no respite for a woman who suffers at the hands of her own husband, but if she was raped outside, the laws would help her. India is a signatory member of the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women, but has not done away with an expressly oppressing law. We are still stuck with the ancient laws based on the principle of pativrata. The article discusses in detail the foundation of the irrevocable consent, the development of law, the implications of the current law and the need and suggestion for changes.


References

  • 1.   Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 375, Exception 2 (as amended by Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013).
  • 2.   Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 375 (as amended by Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013).
  • 3.   Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. Section 3.
  • 4.   Chandra V. Gender relations in early India. 1st ed. New Delhi: Rawat Publications; 2010. p. 75-76.
  • 5.   Chandra V. Gender relations in early India. 1st ed. New Delhi: Rawat Publications; 2010. p. 77.
  • 6.   Chandra V. Gender relations in early India. 1st ed. New Delhi: Rawat Publications; 2010. p. 78.
  • 7.   Chandra V. Gender relations in early India. 1st ed. New Delhi: Rawat Publications; 2010. p. 80.
  • 8.   Child marriage exception to marital rape [Internet]. Google Books; 2014 Sep 9 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 9.   Yadav V. Marital rape. Uttarakhand Judicial & Legal Review.
  • 10.   Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women [Internet]. United Nations Treaty Collection; 2014 Sep 3 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 11.   Progress of the world’s women [Internet]. UN Women; 2014 Sep 10 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 12.   Public policy issues [Internet]. RAINN; 2014 Sep 3 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 13.   House panel backs move not to treat marital rape as sexual offence. Times of India [Internet]. 2014 Sep 3 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 14.   Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 498-A.
  • 15.   Marital rape is officially legal in India [Internet]. Salon; 2014 Sep 11 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 16.   Court grants man divorce over wife's demand for excessive sex. Times of India [Internet]. 2014 Sep 3 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 17.   Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
  • 18.   Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 376(1).
  • 19.   Indian Penal Code, 1860. Section 376A.
  • 20.   Tough to bring sex in child marriage on a par with age of consent [Internet]. Indian Express; 2014 Sep 3 [cited 2026 Mar 3]..
  • 21.   Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 [Internet]. National Law School of India University; 2014 Sep 13 [cited 2026 Mar 3].
  • 22.   Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Section 2(1)(d).
  • 23.   Chandra V. Gender relations in early India. 1st ed. New Delhi: Rawat Publications; 2010. p. 90-92.
  • 24.   Pillay N. Navi Pillay Lecture [Internet]. 2012 May 15 [cited 2014 Sep 4].
  • 25.   Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Article 2 [Internet]. 2014 Sep 3 [cited 2026 Mar 3]. Available from: www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/text/econvention.htm#article2.

About this article


Cite this article

na


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Received Accepted Published
February 01, 2015 February 20, 2015 June 30, 2015

DOI: na

Keywords

RapeJudicial SeparationDecreePativarta

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 22 June 2026, 00:09:05 (IST)


681

Accesses

3
219
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received February 01, 2015
Accepted February 20, 2015
Published June 30, 2015

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Access this article



Share