Abstract

Robotic technology is the latest step in the evolution of minimally invasive techniques. With its enhanced precision and visualization robotic surgery augments the capabilities of plastic surgeons. Robotic technology aids in achieving more precise interventions. This chapter provides an overview regarding the evolution of robotic surgery from its origin to present scenario with its technical details and its myriad of applications in medical sciences with focus on plastic surgery. The limitations and recent advances are also discussed.

• 1.   Estey EP. Robotic prostatectomy: The new standard of care or a marketing success? Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2009; 3 (6): 488–90.
• 2.   Stoianovici D. Robotic Surgery. World J Urol. 2000; 18: 289-295.
• 3.   Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayall S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 1988; 35 (2): 153–61.
• 4.   McConnell PI, Schneeberger EW, Michler RE. History and development of robotic cardiac surgery. Problems in General Surgery. 2003; 20(2): 20–30.
• 5.   Hagn U , Konietschke R, Tobergte A, Nickl M, Jörg S, Kübler B, et al. DLR MiroSurge: a versatile system for research in endoscopic telesurgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 2010; 5(2): 183-93.
• 6.   Snider O, Troccaz J. A six-degree-of-freedom Passive Arm with Dynamic Constraints (PADyC) for cardiac surgery application: Preliminary experiments, Computer Aided Surgery. 2001; 6: 340-351.
• 7.   Saraf S. Robot assisted microsurgery in plastic surgery. IJPS. 2006; 39 (1): 57-61.
• 8.   Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Rinaldo A. Understanding contraindications for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 272: 1551-2.
• 9.   Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC. Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective. Annals of Surgery. 2004; 239(1): 14-21.
• 10.   Jara RD, Guerrón AD, Portenier D. Complications of Robotic Surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):461-468. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Feb 13. PMID: 32169190.
• 11.   Stephenson ER. Sankholkar S, Ducko CT, Damiano RJ. Robotically assisted microsurgery for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998; 66: 1064-7.
• 12.   Stephenson ER, Sankholkar S, Ducko CT, Damiano RJ. Successful endoscopic coronary arteries bypass grafting: An acute large animal trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998; 116:1071-3.
• 13.   Roux L, Peter D, Das H, Esquenazi S, Kelly J, Patrick MD. Robotic assisted microsurgery: A feasibility study in the Rat. Neurosurgery. 2001; 48: 584-9.
• 14.   Rosson GD. Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery. Reconst Microsurg Spring Summer. 2005; 16: 17-8.
• 15.   Smartt JM , Gerety P, Serletti JM, Taylor JA. Application of a robotic telemanipulator to perform posterior pharyngeal flap surgery: a feasibility study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131(4): 841-5.
• 16.   Smartt JM, Gerety P, Taylor JA. Robotic Approaches to Palatoplasty and the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction. Semin Plast Surg. 2014; 28(1): 32–34.
• 17.   Hassanein AH, Mailey BA, Dobke MK. Robot assisted plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012; 39(4): 419-24.
• 18.   Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: laboratory and clinical experience. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28: 457–464.
• 19.   Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129:1305–1312.
• 20.   Watson A. Why Can’t A Computer be More Like a Brain? Science. 1997; 277(5334): 1934-6.
• 21.   Husbands P, Harvey I, Cliff D, and Miller G. Artificial Evolution: A New Path for Artificial Intelligence ? Brain and Cognition. 1997; 34(1):130 159.
• 22.   Gifari, M. W. et al. (2019). A review on recent advances in soft surgical robots for endoscopic applications. Internal Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. https://dx.doi. org/10.1002/rcs.2010.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC6771908/
• 23.   Yeung, C.W.et al. (2019). Emerging next generation robotic colonoscopy systems towards painless colonoscopy. Journal of Digestive Diseases.
• 24.   Rentschler, M. E. et al. (2007). Miniature in vivo robots for remote and harsh environments. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine https://doi.org/10.1109/ titb.2007.898017.
• 25.   Wang, X. et al. (2012). Robotics for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a review. Journal of Robotics.https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ jr/2012/512616/
• 26.   Hamed, A. et al. (2012). Advances in haptics, tactile sensing, and manipulation for robot assisted minimally invasive surgery, non-invasive surgery, and diagnosis. Journal of Robotics.
• 27.   Nelivigi GG. Robotic surgery: India is not ready yet. Indian J Urol. 2007; 23(3): 240–4.
• 28.   Gogra PN. Current Status of Robotic Surgery in India. JIMSA. 2012; 25 (3):145-9.
• 29.   Giri S, Sarkar DK. Current Status of Robotic Surgery. Indian J Surg. 2012 Jun; 74(3): 242-7.
• 30.   Desai M, Chabra J, Ganpule AP. Robotic surgery is ready for prime time in India: For the motion. J Min Access Surg. 2015; 11: 2-4.
• 31.   Bora GS, Narain TA, Sharma AP, et al. Robot assisted surgery in India: A SWOT analysis. Indian J Urol. 2020;36(1):1-3.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding