Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Out of Love and Affection: A Medicolegal Paradox for Denying Gains Vs Pleading Claims

Vivekanshu Verma, Promod Kumar Kohli, Ashok Taneja, A.K. Dubey, Col. Ramphal Gulia

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Journal of Plastic Surgery and Transplantation 7(1):p 07-14, January-June 2026. | DOI: NA

How Cite This Article:

Vivekanshu Verma, Promod Kumar Kohli, Ashok Taneja, et al. Out of Love and Affection: A Medicolegal Paradox for Denying Gains Vs Pleading Claims. J of Pla Sur and Trans. 2026; 7(1): 07-14.

Timeline

Received : February 13, 2026         Accepted : March 15, 2026          Published : June 30, 2026

Abstract

The phrase “out of love and affection” signifies pure altruism in living organ donation to relatives, friends, or spiritual guides under India’s THOTA 1994, where donors explicitly deny commercial intent via affidavits. Yet, relatives of accident victims invoke identical language to claim monetary compensation for “deprivation of love and affection” under MV Act 1988, creating a stark medicolegal paradox. This article dissects judicial tensions from Pranay Sethi (2017) to V. Pathmavathi (2026 LiveLaw (SC) 132), where emotional loss is subsumed under consortium despite critiques. Forensic protocols verify donor consent sans coercion, paralleling accident dependency proofs. Reforms urge harmonized recognition of non-pecuniary “affection” across domains, preventing exploitation while honoring benevolence.


References

  • 1.   Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994.
  • 2.   Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
  • 3.   Guidelines And Required Documents For Processing The Application Of Live Donor Organ Transplantation. https://dme.ap.nic.in/leftmenu_pages/organs/Documents_Required.pdf
  • 4.   SOP on role of police in case of deceased organ donation. https://sottoupdoha.in/files/SOP on Role of Police in Case of Deceased Organ Donation.pdf
  • 5.   Seth AK, Mohanka R, Navin S, Gokhale AG, Sharma A, Kumar A, Ramachandran B, Balakrishnan KR, Mirza D, Mehta D, Zirpe KG, Dhital K, Sahay M, Simha S, Sundaram R, Pandit R, Mani RK, Gursahani R, Gupta S, Kute VB, Shroff S. Organ Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death in India: A Joint Position Paper. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022 Summer;26(4):421-438. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24198. PMID: 35656056; PMCID: PMC9067489. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9067489/
  • 6.   h t t p s : / / w w w . s c r i b d . c o m / document/634134754/THOTA-RULES
  • 7.   Kataria, RP. Sriniwas, SKP. Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 (Along with Rules, 2014 & WHO Guidelines). Orient. 2016.
  • 8.   h t t p s : / / w w w . n o t t o . m o h f w . g o v . i n / WriteReadData/Portal/News/848_1_ NOTTO_Transplant_manual-final_version.pdf
  • 9.   Sudha Mathesan & Anr. v. The Authorisation Committee (Transplantation) & Anr. (Madras HC: 2024:MHC:2112) https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-sudha-mathesan-v-the-authorisationcommittee-transplantation-2024-mhc-2112- organ-donation-1538314
  • 10.   Uvais Muhammad K.C. v. State of Kerala (Kerala HC, 2025) 2025/KER/195.
  • 11.   Sundaram, R. Altruistic Organ Donation: A Judicial Perspective. Jan 10, 2025. https://w w w . i n d i a l a w . i n / b l o g / c i v i l / o r g a n -donation-a-judicial-perspective/
  • 12.   Uvais Muhammad K.C. v. State of Kerala (Kerala HC, 2025) 2025/KER/195 https://www.legitquest.com/case/uvais-muhammad-kc-vstate-of-kerala-and-ors/7B49F0
  • 13.   Uvais Muhammad K.C. v. State of Kerala (Kerala HC, 2025) 2025/KER/195 https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/67a3b8182738e4136478192b
  • 14.   Rathore, Riya. Permission For Organ Donation Can’t Be Rejected Unless There Is Cogent Material To Establish ‘Commercial Element’: Kerala HC. 13 Jan 2025. https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/kerala-high-court/organ-donation-cannot-berejected-without-evidence-of-commercialelement-uvais-muhammad-kc-v-state-ofkerala-2025-ker-195-1564608
  • 15.   Strengthening Altruistic Organ Donation: The Kerala High Court’s Landmark Ruling on Non-Relative Transplants https://www.casemine.com/commentary/in/strengthening-altruistic-organ-donation:-thekerala-high-court’s-landmark-ruling-on-nonrelative-transplants/view
  • 16.   Shilpa, S. Altruistic Donation And Legal Barriers: A Case Comment On Organ Transplantation in Uvais Muhammed K.C Vs The State of Kerala. International Journal For Legal Research And Analysis (IJLRA) Mar-2025 | Volume: II | Issue: 7 https://www.ijlra.com/details/altruistic-donationand-legal-barriers-a-case-comment-on-organtransplantation-in-uvais-muhammed-k-c-vsthe-state-of-kerala-by-shilpa
  • 17.   V. Pathmavathi & Ors. v. Bharthi AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 132.
  • 18.   https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/v-pathmavathi-v-bharthi-axageneral-insurance-co-ltd-2026-insc-131-lossof-love-affection-not-distinct-head-motoraccident-compensation-consortium-1606807
  • 19.   https://www.scobserver.in/supreme-courtobserver-law-reports-scolr/pathmavathi-vbharati-general-insurance/
  • 20.   National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680.
  • 21.   Sunita & Ors Vs Vinod Singh & Ors. 2025 INSC 366 https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2018/39284/39284_2018_16_1501_60111_Judgement_19-Mar-2025.pdf
  • 22.   PTC India Financial Services Ltd. v. Venkateshwarlu (2021)
  • 23.   Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram, (2018) 18 SCC 130.
  • 24.   Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh, (2013) 9 SCC 54.
  • 25.   United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur, (2021) 11 SCC 780.
  • 26.   https://www.lawweb.in/2026/01/madrashc-how-to-calculate-compensation.html
  • 27.   V. Pathmavathi & Ors. Versus Bharthi Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd & ANR. Citation : 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 132 https://w w w . l i v e l a w . i n / s u p r e m e - c o u r t /supreme-court-expresses-reservationsabout-cb-judgment-that-loss-of-loveaffection-cant-be-separately-compensated-inmotor-accident-claims-522543

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Vivekanshu Verma, Promod Kumar Kohli, Ashok Taneja, et al. Out of Love and Affection: A Medicolegal Paradox for Denying Gains Vs Pleading Claims. J of Pla Sur and Trans. 2026; 7(1): 07-14.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
February 13, 2026 March 15, 2026 June 30, 2026

DOI: NA

Keywords

Organ donation altruismLove and affection paradoxTHOTA consentMV Act compensationForensic affidavit verificationLoss of consortium

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 27 July 2026, 14:05:42 (IST)


645

Accesses

11
479
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received February 13, 2026
Accepted March 15, 2026
Published June 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share