Akoijam Sanjoy PhD Scholar, Department of Anthropology, Manipur University, Canchipur, Imphal, Manipur, India
Haobijam Vokendro Professor, Department of Anthropology, Manipur University, Canchipur, Imphal, Manipur, India
Address for correspondence: Akoijam Sanjoy, PhD Scholar, Department of Anthropology, Manipur University, Canchipur, Imphal, Manipur, India E-mail: sanjoyak@gmail.com
This license
enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any
medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as
attribution is given to the creator.
Haobijam Vokendro, Akoijam Sanjoy. Reviewing Human Longevity through the Lens of Cultural Anthropology. Ind J Res Anthropol 2026; 12(1): 85-91.
Timeline
Received : September 15, 2025
Accepted : October 30, 2025
Published : June 30, 2026
Abstract
Human longevity is an emerging area of interdisciplinary research, and sociocultural anthropology provides important insights into the complex relationship between cultural practices, social structures and long lifespans. This review examines anthropological perspectives on longevity through analysis of relevant published literature. It highlights current understanding of how factors like cultural beliefs, social practices, dietary patterns, community structures and spiritual systems influence ageing across populations. Key findings reveal that longevity promoting factors include robust social networks and intergenerational relationships, traditional diets embedded within cultural food systems, integration of physical activity into meaningful daily activities, positive cultural attitudes towards ageing and spiritual beliefs that provide life purpose and resilience. Theoretical frameworks including the biocultural approach, social capital theory, practice theory, kinship theory etc. provide valuable perspectives for understanding human longevity in the socio-cultural context. However, processes like modernisation and globalisation can threaten traditional longevity promoting practices through dietary transitions, social network disruption and environmental degradation. The review also identifies some gaps and limitations in longevity research and also proposes future research directions. The findings can contribute to developing culturally sensitive interventions for healthy ageing and age-friendly community designs that use anthropological insights.
References
1. Antonucci, Toni C., Kristine J. Ajrouch, and Kira S. Birditt. “The convoy model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective.” The Gerontologist 54.1 (2014): 82-92.
2. Berkes, Fikret. “Indigenous knowledge and resource management systems in the Canadian subarctic.” Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience (2000): 98-128.
3. Brown, Phil, and Stephen Zavestoski. “Social movements in health: an introduction.” Sociology of health & illness 26.6 (2004), 679-694.
4. Buettner, Dan, and Sam Skemp. “Blue zones: lessons from the world’s longest lived.” American journal of lifestyle medicine 10.5 (2016): 318-321.
5. Cockerham, William C., Brian P. Hinote, and Pamela Abbott. “Psychological distress, gender, and health lifestyles in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine.” Social science & medicine 63.9 (2006): 2381-2394.
6. Cohen, Lawrence. “No aging in India: The uses of gerontology.” Culture, medicine and psychiatry 16.2 (1992): 123-161.
7. Crews, Douglas E. “Senescence, aging, and disease.” Journal of physiological anthropology 26.3 (2007): 365-372.
8. Estes, Carroll L., and Chris Phillipson. “The globalization of capital, the welfare state, and old age policy.” International journal of health services 32.2 (2002): 279-297.
9. Fraser, Gary E., and David J. Shavlik. “Ten years of life: Is it a matter of choice?.” Archives of internal medicine 161.13 (2001): 1645-1652.
10. Fry, Christine L. “Culture, age, and subjective well-being: Health, functionality, and the infrastructure of eldercare in comparative perspective.” Journal of Family Issues 21.6 (2000): 751-776.
11. Glass, Thomas A. “Assessing the success of successful aging.” Annals of Internal Medicine 139.5 (2003): 382.
12. Hallal, Pedro C., et al. “Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects.” The Lancet 380.9838 (2012): 247-257.
13. Holt-Lunstad, Julianne, Timothy B. Smith, and J. Bradley Layton. “Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review.” PLoS medicine 7.7 (2010): e1000316.
14. Ikels, Charlotte. “Economic reform and intergenerational relationships in China.” Oxford Development Studies 34.4 (2006): 387-400.
15. Israel, Barbara A., et al. “Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities.” American journal of public health 100.11 (2010): 2094-2102.
16. Jervis, Lori L. “Jay Sokolovsky, editor, The Cultural Context of Aging: Worldwide Perspectives, Third Edition, Greenwood Press, 2009”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 24.3.(2009): 319-320.
17. Kaufman, Sharon R., and Lynn M. Morgan. “The anthropology of the beginnings and ends of life.” Medical Anthropology (2023): 465-489.
18. Koenig, Harold G. “Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review.” The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 54.5 (2009): 283-291.
19. Lamb, Sarah. “Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging.” Journal of aging studies 29 (2014): 41-52.
20. Levy, Becca R., et al. “Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging.” Journal of personality and social psychology 83.2 (2002): 261-270.
21. Lock, Margaret. “Twice Dead: Organ transplants and the reinvention of death.” The Body. Routledge, 2020. 262-266.
22. Mehta, Kalyani, Mohd Maliki Osman, and Lee EY Alexander. “Living arrangements of the elderly in Singapore: Cultural norms in transition.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10.1 (1995): 113-143.
23. Mendes, Felismina Rosa. “Active ageing: A right or a duty?.” Health sociology review 22.2 (2013): 174-185.
24. Mintz, Sidney W., and Christine M. Du Bois. “The anthropology of food and eating.” Annual review of anthropology 31.1 (2002): 99-119.
25. Oman, Doug, and Carl E. Thoresen. “Invited essay:” Spiritual modeling: A key to spiritual and religious growth?”.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 13.3 (2003): 149-165.
26. Pes, Giovanni Mario, et al. “Lifestyle and nutrition related to male longevity in Sardinia: an ecological study.” Nutrition, metabolism and cardiovascular diseases 23.3 (2013): 212-219.
27. Popkin, Barry M. “Global nutrition dynamics: the world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases.” The American journal of clinical nutrition 84.2 (2006): 289-298.
28. Poulain, Michel, Gianni Pes, and Luisa Salaris. “A population where men live as long as women: Villagrande Strisaili, Sardinia.” Journal of Aging Research 2011.1 (2011): 153756.
29. Pretty, Jules, et al. “The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture.” International journal of agricultural sustainability 8.4 (2010): 219-236.
30. Rosero-Bixby, Luis, William H. Dow, and David H. Rehkopf. “The Nicoya region of Costa Rica: a high longevity island for elderly males.” Vienna yearbook of population research/Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of Sciences 11 (2013): 109.
31. Torres, Sandra. “Expanding the gerontological imagination on ethnicity: conceptual and theoretical perspectives.” Ageing & Society 35.5 (2015): 935-960.
32. Wiley, Andrea S. An ecology of high-altitude infancy: A biocultural perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
33. Willcox, Donald Craig, Giovanni Scapagnini, and Bradley J. Willcox. “Healthy aging diets other than the Mediterranean: a focus on the Okinawan diet.” Mechanisms of ageing and development 136 (2014): 148-162.
34. Willcox, Bradley J., et al. “Caloric restriction, the traditional Okinawan diet, and healthy aging: the diet of the world’s longest-lived people and its potential impact on morbidity and life span.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1114.1 (2007): 434-455.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Haobijam Vokendro, Akoijam Sanjoy. Reviewing Human Longevity through the Lens of Cultural Anthropology. Ind J Res Anthropol 2026; 12(1): 85-91.
This license
enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any
medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as
attribution is given to the creator.
This license
enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any
medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as
attribution is given to the creator.