Dhananjay Tandon Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Cheshta Kurre Student, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Rupal Purena Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Madhavi Pandey Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Khushbu Verma Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Ashis Kumar Sarkar Professor, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Misha Martin Assistant professor, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
Address for correspondence: Dhananjay Tandon, Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Science, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India E-mail: dhanajaytandon@sruraipur.ac.in
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Dhananjay Tandon, Cheshta Kurre, Rupal Purena et. al, Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Clinical Samples in Raipur City. J Microbiol Relat Res. 2025; 11(2): 71–79.
Timeline
Received : April 10, 2025
Accepted : April 23, 2025
Published : December 30, 2025
Abstract
Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is a commensal organism residing on human skin and mucosal surfaces as part of the normal flora. However, it is an opportunistic pathogen capable of causing infections when enters human body. The emergence of multidrug-resistant S. aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA), has become a significant public health challenge. Aim: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of S. aureus isolated from various body fluids. Methods: The bacterial samples were procured from Dr. Micro Lab between July 2024 and September 2024. S. aureus isolates were identified based on microscopic examination and biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar. Results: Out of over 160 bacterial isolates, 70 were identified as S. aureus. Among these, 29 isolates (40%) were recovered from pus and wound infections. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) accounted for 33 (49%) of the S. aureus isolates. Resistance patterns showed that Linezolid exhibited no resistance, while Nitrofurantoin demonstrated the highest resistance rates. Conclusion: The study highlights a significant prevalence of S. aureus infections, particularly in females aged 21–30 years, with a higher frequency of isolates obtained from urine and pus infections. The findings show the growing resistance of S. aureus to commonly used antibiotics such as Penicillin and Erythromycin, raising concerns about treatment efficacy. However, Linezolid’s lack of resistance suggests it remains a reliable therapeutic option for managing MRSA infections.
References
1. Graham CJ. The global threat of antibiotic resistance: what can be done? JoGHR 2017; 1: e2017002. https://doi.org/10.29392/joghr. 1.e2017002.
2. Nandhini P, Kumar P, Mickymaray S, Alothaim AS, Somasundaram J, Rajan M. Recent developments in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) treatment: a review. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(5):606. https:// doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11050606.
3. Appelbaum PC. Microbiology of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45(3): S165-70. https://doi. org/10.1086/519474.
4. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39(3):309-17. https://doi.org/10.1086/421946.
5. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist BJ, Paterson DL. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. CMI 2012;18(3):268-81. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x.
6. Cong Y, Yang S, Rao X. Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A review of case updating and clinical features. J. Adv. Res. 2020; 21:169-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jare.2019.10.005.
7. Yang CH, Lee SY, Pan HY, Su PW, Chuang LY. Prevalence and molecular characterization of plasmidmediated beta-lactamase genes among nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Taiwan. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2017; 16(1):155-60. https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v16i1.20.
8. Abdeta A, Beyene D, Negeri AA. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species at the Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Ethiopia: A five-year retrospective analysis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022:6155-66. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR. S429687
9. Mahon CR, Lehman DC. Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology-E-Book: Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.
10. Reiner K. Catalase test protocol. American society for microbiology. 2010 Nov 11; 1(1):1-9.
11. Rakotovao-Ravahatra ZD, Randriatsarafara FM, Milasoanjara RN, Ranaivosoa MK, Rakotovao AL, Rasamindrakotroka A. Assessment of the coagulase test in the identification of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Biotechnol. Biomed. 2019; 2(3):105-11.
12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2023; M100-ED33.
13. Alahmadi TF, Alahmadey ZZ, Elbanna K, Neyaz LA, Ahmad I, Abulreesh HH. The Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Multidrug-resistant Hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus in Medina, Saudi Arabia. JPAM 2023; 17(1).https://doi. org/10.22207/JPAM.17.1.44.
14. Kika B, Abazaj E, Petri O, Koraqi A. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillinresistant S. aureus in Adult Hospitalized Patients in “Mother Theresa” Hospital Center in Albania. OAMJMS. 2020;8(A):360-5.
15. Sapkota J, Sharma M, Jha B, Bhatt CP. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital: a descriptive cross-sectional study. JNMA: JNMA. 2019; 57(220):398.https://doi. org/10.31729/jnma.4673.
16. Mehta Y, Hegde A, Pande R, Zirpe KG, Gupta V, Ahdal J, Qamra A, Motlekar S, Jain R. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit setting of India: a review of clinical burden, patterns of prevalence, preventive measures, and future strategies. IJCCM: 2020; 24(1):55.https://doi. org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23337.
17. Adhikari P, Basyal D, Rai JR, Bharati L, Budthapa A, Gharti KP, Sah SK. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and multidrug resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples at a tertiary care teaching hospital: an observational, cross-sectional study from the Himalayan country, Nepal. BMJ open. 2023;13(5): e067384. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2022-067384.
18. Yao Z, Wu Y, Xu H, Lei Y, Long W, Li M, Gu Y, Jiang Z, Cao C. Prevalence, and clinical characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections among dermatology inpatients: A 7-year retrospective study at a tertiary care center in southwest China. Front. Public Health. 2023; 11:1124930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1124930.
19. Soe PE, Han WW, Sagili KD, Satyanarayana S, Shrestha P, Htoon TT, Tin HH. High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare facilities and its related factors in Myanmar (2018–2019). TMID or TropicalMed 2021; 6(2):70. https://doi. org/10.3390/tropicalmed6020070.
20. Chukwueze CM, Udeani TK, Obeagu EI, Ikpenwa JN, Nneka A. Prevalence of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections among Hospitalized Wound Patients from Selected Tertiary Hospitals within Enugu Metropolis. J. adv. med. pharm. sci. 2022; 24(3):18-27.https://doi.org/10.9734/ jamps/2022/v24i330290.
21. Wan Y, Mills E, Leung RC, Vieira A, Zhi X, Croucher NJ, Woodford N, Jauneikaite E, Ellington MJ, Sriskandan S. Alterations in chromosomal genes nfsA, nfsB, and ribE are associated with nitrofurantoin resistance in Escherichia coli from the United Kingdom. Microb. genom.. 2021; 7(12):000702. https:// doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000702.
22. Preeti, P., Joshi, A., & Dev, M. Determination of sensitivity to linezolid in drug-resistant tuberculosis cases. GJRA 2023; 12(4): 2277 - 8160.https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/9214078.
23. Hayes G, Wright N, Gardner SL, Telzrow CL, Wommack AJ, Vigueira PA. Manuka honey and methylglyoxal increase the sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus to linezolid. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018; 66(6):491-5. https://doi. org/10.1111/lam.12880.
24. Mandell JB, Orr S, Koch J, Nourie B, Ma D, Bonar DD, Shah N, Urish KL. Large variations in clinical antibiotic activity against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms of periprosthetic joint infection isolates. J Orthop Res. 2019; 37(7):1604-9. https://doi. org/10.1002/jor.24291.
25. Sigmund IK, Renz N, Feihl S, Morgenstern C, Cabric S, Trampuz A. Value of multiplex PCR for detection of antimicrobial resistance in samples retrieved from patients with orthopaedic infections Microbiol. 2020; 20:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01741-7.
26. Gurung RR, Maharjan P, Chhetri GG. Antibiotic resistance pattern of Staphylococcus aureus with reference to MRSA isolates from pediatric patients. Future Sci. OA 2020; 6(4): FSO464. https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa- 2019-0122.
27. Sami Awayid H, Qassim Mohammad S. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Iraqi hospitals. Arch. Razi Inst. 2022; 77(3):1147-56. https://doi. org/10.22092/ARI.2022.357391.2031.
28. Kot B, Wierzchowska K, Piechota M, Grużewska A. Antimicrobial resistance patterns in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients hospitalized during 2015–2017 in hospitals in Poland. Med Princ Pract. 2020; 29(1):61-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501788.
29. An NV, Hai LH, Luong VH, Vinh NT, Hoa PQ, Hung LV, Son NT, Hong LT, Hung DV, Kien HT, Le MN. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus isolated at a general hospital in Vietnam between 2014 and 2021. Infect. Drug Resist. 2024:259-73.https://doi. org/10.2147/IDR.S437920.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available.
Funding
There was no any type of funding support for this study.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
There are no use of human or any animal in this study
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for Dr. Microlab, Kamal Vihar, Raipur (CG), India to provide the bacterial cultures with their clinical history to facilitate this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Dhananjay Tandon, Cheshta Kurre, Rupal Purena et. al, Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Clinical Samples in Raipur City. J Microbiol Relat Res. 2025; 11(2): 71–79.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Figure 2: Gender distribution among sample population
Description: The study comprised 70 participants, in which 40 of the participants were female (57.14%), while 30 were male (42.85%) as shown in figure 2.
Figure 3: The distribution of methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
Description: Among the 70 Staphylococcus samples analysed, 33 (49%) were identified as Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), while the remaining 37 (51%) were classified as Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) as shown in figure 3.
Figure 1: The images show growth characters, cell wall type and biochemical test of S. aureus.
Description: No description available.
Figure 4: Specimen distribution in sample population
Description: In this study we found more S. aureus isolates in urine sample (50%), followed by pus (41%) as shown in figure 4.
Figure 5: Age Distribution in the Sample Population infected with S. aureus
Description: No description available.
Figure 6: Antibiogram of S. aureus against various antibiotics
Description: No description available.
Table 1: Distribution of specimens from different age groups in the sample population