Abstract

Introduction: The digital age has revolutionized healthcare delivery, with telemedicine emerging as a crucial component. The integration of telemedicine represents a paradigm shift in healthcare delivery, with young adults playing a pivotal role in shaping its adoption. Methodology: The study was conducted on 246 participants between the age range of 18 and 35 years. Data was collected using the Telemedicine Perception Questionnaire among the participants. Findings: A significant majority (63.8%) deemed telemedicine a valuable resource in healthcare. Telemedicine interaction is positively perceived, with 45.5% feeling they receive more attention, 36.6% finding communication comparable to face to-face interactions, and 56.9% expressing confidence in accessing telemedicine services when needed. Conclusion: Telemedicine offers a plethora of benefits for patients. As we continue to navigate the digital age, understanding and embracing telemedicine’s potential will be crucial in shaping the future of healthcare delivery.

• 1.   Barney, A., Mendez-Contreras, S., Hills, N. K., Buckelew, S. M., & Raymond-Flesch, M. (2023). Telemedicine in an adolescent and young adult medicine clinic: a mixed methods study. BMC health services research, 23(1), 680.
• 2.   Colucci, M., Baldo, V., Baldovin, T., & Bertoncello, C. (2019). A “matter of communication”: A to new classification compare and evaluate telehealth and telemedicine interventions and understand their effectiveness as a communication process. Health informatics journal, 25(2), 446-460.
• 3.   Farhat, S. (2019). Telemedicine Adoption Across Health Care Organizations (Master›s thesis, California State University, Bakersfield)
• 4.   George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2023). Telemedicine: A New Way to Provide Healthcare. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 1(3), 98-129.
• 5.   Kehayov, I., Uchikov, P., Kitova, T., & Kitov, B. (2022). Limitations of telemedicine in low and middle-income countries. Neurosurgical Focus, 53(3), E20.
• 6.   Depuru, B., Subramanyam, S. S. K., Anchapakala, S. L., & Pydipati, L. P. (2022). The Benefits and Limitations of Telemedicine During COVID-19: An Overview. Handbook of Research on Advances in Data Analytics and Complex Communication Networks, 160-167.
• 7.   Guldager, R., Nordentoft, S., Bruun-Pedersen, M., & Hindhede, A. L. (2023). Social network trajectory of young adults aged 18− 35 years diagnosed with a brain tumour: a protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ open, 13(12), e076337.
• 8.   Botrugno, C. (2019). Towards an ethics for telehealth. Nursing Ethics, 26(2), 357-367.
• 9.   Watson, D., Mhlaba, M., Molelekeng, G., Chauke, T. A., Simao, S. C., Jenner, S., ... & Barker, M. (2023). How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(1), 17.
• 10.   Nyoni, T., Evers, E. C., Pérez, M., Jeffe, D. B., Fritz, S. A., Colditz, G. A., & Burnham, J. P. (2023). Perceived barriers and facilitators to the adoption of telemedicine infectious diseases consultations in Southeastern Missouri hospitals. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 1357633X221149461.
• 11.   Scott, R. E., & Mars, M. (2015). Telehealth in the developing world: current status and future prospects. Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth, 25-37.
• 12.   Matsumoto, M. E., Wilske, G. C., & Tapia, R. (2021). Innovative approaches to delivering telehealth. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics, 32(2), 451-465.
• 13.   Armfield, N. R., Gray, L. C., & Smith, A. C. (2012). Clinical use of Skype: a review of the evidence base. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 18(3), 125-127.
• 14.   Wildevuur, S., Thomese, F., Ferguson, J., & Klink, A. (2017). Information and communication technologies to support chronic disease self management: preconditions for enhancing the partnership in person-centered care. Journal of Participatory Medicine, 9(1), e8846.
• 15.   Scott Kruse, C., Karem, P., Shifflett, K., Vegi, L., Ravi, K., & Brooks, M. (2018). Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 24(1), 4-12.
• 16.   Wardlow, L., Leff, B., Biese, K., Roberts, C., Archbald–Pannone, L., Ritchie, C., ... & Collaborative for Telehealth and Aging. (2023). Development of telehealth principles and guidelines for older adults: A modified Delphi approach. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 71(2), 371-382.
• 17.   Kirubakaran, S. J., Gunasekaran, A., Dolly, D. R. J., Jagannath, D. J., & Peter, J. D. (2023). A feasible approach to smart remote health monitoring: Subscription-based model. Frontiers in public health, 11, 1150455.
• 18.   Evans, Y. N., Golub, S., Sequeira, G. M., Eisenstein, E., & North, S. (2020). Using telemedicine to reach adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(4), 469-471.
• 19.   Verhoeven, F., Tanja-Dijkstra, K., Nijland, N., Eysenbach, G., & van Gemert-Pijnen, L. (2010). Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: a systematic literature review. Journal of diabetes science and technology, 4(3), 666-684.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding