Abstract

This research aims to identify the trends and development and how technology supports education these days using the VOSviewer database. The purpose of the study is to appraise the research productivity on learning management systems (LMS) in India and to examine the various indicators like growth trajectory, annual growth rate, authorship trends, collaborative patterns, institutional collaboration, most prolific authors, top-ranked journals, top-ranked subjects, and top-ranked funding agencies. This study was conducted through scientometric analysis of Learning Management System (LMS) in the two decades from 2004 to 2023 retrieving the metadata in the Scopus database, VOSviewer mapping visualization application, and MS Excel spreadsheet for analysis. This study was expected to identify the research trends, collaborative patterns, novelty, and future education in LMS adaptability. The results show that Learning Management System Publication consists of 7 clusters with 3353 links and a total of 12025 Link Strengths through 178 items through the VOSviewer application. We examined how many articles have been published on the Learning Management System and connected with their problem areas using VOSviewer. This analysis can be aninitial point for further research related to LMS or mode of Distance Learning.

• 1.   Dzuranin, A. C. J. R. and Olvera, M. (2018). Infusing data analytics into the accounting curriculum: A framework and insights from faculty. J. Account. Educ., 43, 24-39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jaccedu.2018.03.004.
• 2.   Picatoste,J., Perez-Ortiz, L and Ruesga-Benito, S. M. (2017). A new educational pattern in response to new technologies and sustainable development. Enlightening ICT skills for youth employability in the European Union. Telemat. Informatics, 35 (4), 1031-1038, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tele.2017.09.014.
• 3.   Williams, P. (2019). Does competency-based education with blockchain signal a new mission for universities?. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag., 41 (1),104-117, https://doi.org/10.1080/136008 0X.2018.1520491.
• 4.   van de Oudeweetering, K and J. Voogt, J. (2018). Teachers’ conceptualization and enactment of twenty-first-century competences: exploring dimensions for new curricula. Curric. J., 29 (1) 116- 133, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.13691 36.
• 5.   Ayouni, S. et al. (2021). Fuzzy vikor application for learning management systems evaluation in higher education. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ., 17 (2), 17-35, https://doi.org/10.4018/ IJICTE.2021040102.
• 6.   Kaewsaiha, P and Chanchalor, S. (2021). Factors affecting the usage of learning management systems in higher education. Educ. Inf. Technol., 26 (3), 2919-2939, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639- 020-10374-2.
• 7.   Balkaya, S and Akkucuk, U. (2021). Adoption and use of learning management systems in education: The role of playfulness and self-management. Sustain., 13 (3), 1-27, https://doi.org/10.3390/ su13031127.
• 8.   Shurygin, V, et al. (2021). Learning management systems in academic and corporate distance education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 16 (11), 121-139, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.20701.
• 9.   Botha, A., Smuts, H and de Villiers, C. (2018). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to learning management system feature implementation in higher education: lessons learned, vol. 11284 LNCS. Springer International Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-03580-8_7.
• 10.   Holmes, K.A and Prieto-Rodriguez, E. (2018). Student and staff perceptions of a learning management system for blended learning in teacher education. Aust. J. Teach. Educ., 43 (3), 21- 34, https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.2.
• 11.   Snoussi, T. (2019). Learning management system in education: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explore. Eng., 8 (12S), 664-667, https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.L1161.10812S19.
• 12.   Dorobat, I., Corbeau, A. M. I. and Muntean, M. (2019). Integrating student trust in a conceptual model for assessing learning management system success in higher education: an empirical analysis. IEEE Access, 7, 69202-69214, https://doi. org/10.1109/.
• 13.   Z. Bojovic, Z., et al. (2020). Education in times of crisis: Rapid transition to distance learning. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., 28 (6), 1467-1489, https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22318 56.
• 14.   Hasnan, M. B. and M. B. Mohin. (2021). Implementation of LMS-CIDOS in polytechnic English language classroom: issues and challenges. Asian J. Univ. Educ., 17 (4), 527-537, https://doi. org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16253.
• 15.   Mohd Nasir, F. D. et al. (2021). Student satisfaction in using a learning management system (LMS) for blended learning courses for tertiary education. Asian J. Univ. Educ., 17 (4), 442-454, https://doi. org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16225.
• 16.   Priatna, Asep. (2022). Development Learning Management System: Publication Analysis Using Bibliometric Using VOSviewer Application. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2022), 182-188.
• 17.   Velmurugan, C. (2013). Bibliometric analysis with special reference to Authorship Pattern and Collaborative Research Output of Annals of Library and Information Studies for the Year 2007 - 2012. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 3 (3), 13-21.
• 18.   Cao, T. H., et al. (2020). A bibliometric review of research on STEM education in ASEAN: Science mapping the literature in Scopus database, 2000 to 2019. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1889. https://doi. org/10.29333/ejmste/8500.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding