Abstract

This review study was motivated by the earlier relevance article as well as the theoretical concepts of Knowledge Sharing (KS) and Information Service Innovation (ISI). Because the use of appropriate theory enables the KS to move forward ISI and to be improve information professionals’ quality. This study followed a literature review approach where secondary information is used for research. Based on the existing reliable literature, this review study values that the identification and application of the most theoretical approach’s are highly significant in achieving the common goal, which ultimately outcomes in the KS and ISI relevant.

• 1.   Wan, X., He, R., Zhang, G., & Zhou, J. (2022). Employee engagement and open service innovation: The roles of creative self-efficacy and employee innovative behaviour. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 921687.
• 2.   Islam, M. A., Agarwal, N. K., & Ikeda, M. (2015). Knowledge management for service innovation in academic libraries: A qualitative study. Library Management, 36(1/2), 40–57.
• 3.   Li, Q., Wang, Z. Y., Li, W. H., Li, J., Wang, C., & Du, R. Y. (2013). Applications integration in a hybrid cloud computing environment: Modelling and platform. Enterprise Information Systems, 7(3), 237–271.
• 4.   Molose, T., & Ezeuduji, I. O. (2015). Knowledge sharing, team culture, and service innovation in the hospitality sector: the case of South Africa. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 4(1), 1–16.
• 5.   Ofori, D., Osei, A., Mensah, S. A., & Affum, E. K. (2015). Innovation and knowledge sharing: a new competitive advantage in the mobile telecommunication industry in Ghana. Science Journal of Business and Management, 3(5), 157–163.
• 6.   Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165–186.
• 7.   Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(03), 377–400.
• 8.   Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6, 91–100.
• 9.   Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of ‘competition’ within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intra organizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.
• 10.   Thakur, R., & Hale, D. (2013). Service innovation: A comparative study of US and Indian service firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1108–1123.
• 11.   Quarnberg, T. M. (2011). Community satisfaction, community attachment, community experience, internet use and internet access in rural Utah communities. (Master's Thesis). Brigham Young University.
• 12.   Antonova, A., Csepregi, A., & Marchev Jr, A. (2011). How to extend the ICT used at organizations for transferring and sharing knowledge. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 37.
• 13.   Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76.
• 14.   Möller, K., & Svahn, S. (2004). Crossing East-West boundaries: Knowledge sharing in intercultural business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 219–228.
• 15.   Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337–359.
• 16.   Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.
• 17.   Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W., & Borman, W. C. (2003). Hiring for knowledge-based competition. In S. E. Jackson, M. A. Hitt & A. S. Denisi (Eds.), Managing knowledge for sustained competitive advantage (pp. 155–176). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• 18.   Jantz, R. (2001). Knowledge management in academic libraries: special tools and processes to support information professionals. Reference Services Review, 29(1), 33–39.
• 19.   Martin, B., Hazeri, A., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2006). Knowledge management and the LIS professions: investigating the implications for practice and for educational provision. The Australian Library Journal, 55(1), 12–29.
• 20.   Madge, O. L. P. (2012). Creating a culture of learning and knowledge sharing in libraries and information services. In New research on knowledge management models and methods (pp. 245–268).
• 21.   Wen, S. (2005). Implementing knowledge management in academic libraries: a pragmatic approach. (Doctoral dissertation). Ann Arbor.
• 22.   Yaacob, R. A., Jamaluddin, A., & Jusoff, K. (2010). Knowledge management and challenging roles of academic librarians. Management Science and Engineering, 4(4), 14.
• 23.   Yeşil, S., & Hırlak, B. (2013). An empirical investigation into the influence of knowledge sharing barriers on knowledge sharing and individual innovation behaviour. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 9(2), 38–61.
• 24.   Cheng, M. Y., Ho, J. S. Y., & Lau, P. M. (2009). Knowledge sharing in academic institutions: A study of Multimedia University Malaysia. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(3).
• 25.   Gloet, M., & Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 402–409.
• 26.   Assefa, T. (2010, November). Enabling knowledge sharing to promote innovative organizations in Africa. Paper presented at Expert Group Meeting on Harnessing Knowledge to Achieve MDGs, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
• 27.   Andriessen, J. E. (2006). To share or not to share, that is the question: Conditions for the willingness to share knowledge. IS-2006-02 Delft Innovation System Papers.
• 28.   Aulawi, H., Sudirman, I., Suryadi, K., & Govindaraju, R. (2009). Knowledge sharing behavior, antecedent and their impact on the individual innovation capability. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 5(12), 2238–2246.
• 29.   Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4). (Note: Year/Vol mismatch in source; likely 2001 is the year, but JKM Vol 11 was 2007).
• 30.   Fernando, Y. (2013). Service innovation along the chain of service process in airline business. In Outsourcing Management for Supply Chain Operations and Logistics Service (pp. 185–201). IGI Global.
• 31.   Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003. (Corrected
• 32.   Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
• 33.   Orlikowski, W. J., & Robey, D. (1991). Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2(2), 143–169.
• 34.   DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147.
• 35.   Salisbury, W. D., et al. (2002). Research report: better theory through measurement in developing a scale to capture consensus on appropriation. Information Systems Research, 13(1), 91–103.
• 36.   Fari, S. A. (2015). Applying social capital theory and the technology acceptance model in information and knowledge sharing research. Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 19–28.
• 37.   Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7.
• 38.   Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• 39.   Kaba, B., N'Da, K., & Mbarika, V. (2008). Understanding the Factors Influencing the Attitude Toward and the Use of Mobile Technology in Developing Countries. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 127.
• 40.   Li, Y., Qi, J., & Shu, H. (2008). A Review on the Relationship Between New Variables and Classical TAM Structure. Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems II, 1, 53–63.
• 41.   Singh, N., Fassott, G., Chao, M. C. H., & Hoffmann, J. A. (2006). Understanding international web site usage. International Marketing Review, 23(1), 83–97.
• 42.   Kremer, H., Villamor, I., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity, voice, and knowledge sharing. Business Horizons, 62(1), 65–74.
• 43.   Adams, M. E., Day, G. S., & Dougherty, D. (1998). Enhancing new product development performance: an organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), 403–422.
• 44.   Hoopes, D., & Postrel, S. (1999). Shared knowledge “glitches” and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(9), 837–865.
• 45.   Mesmer-Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546.
• 46.   Storey, C., & Kelly, D. (2002). Innovation in services: The need for knowledge management. Australasian Marketing Journal, 10(1), 59–70.
• 47.   Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and type of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210–222.
• 48.   Belso, J., & Diez, I. (2018). Firm´s strategic choices and network knowledge dynamics: How do they affect innovation? Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(1), 1–20.
• 49.   Cavusgil, S., Calantone, R., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6–21.
• 50.   Camelo, C., García, J., Sousa, E., & Valle, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: The mediating role of affective commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1442–1463.
• 51.   Podrug, N., Filipovic, D., & Kovac, M. (2017). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability in Croatian ICT companies. International Journal of Manpower, 38(4), 632–644.
• 52.   Taminiau, I., Smit, W., & Lange, A. (2009). Innovation in management consulting firms through informal knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 42–55.
• 53.   Mura, M., Lettieri, E., Radaelli, G., & Spiller, N. (2013). Promoting professionals´ innovative behavior through knowledge sharing: The moderating role of social capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 527–544.
• 54.   Wang, C., & Hu, Q. (2018). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Technovation, 70.
• 55.   Wang, J., Yang, J., & Xue, Y. (2017). Subjective well-being, knowledge sharing and individual innovation behavior. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(8), 1110–1127.
• 56.   Connell, J., Kriz, A., & Thorpe, M. (2014). Industry clusters: An antidote for knowledge sharing and collaborative innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 137–151.
• 57.   Kamasak, R., & Bulutlar, F. (2010). The influence of knowledge sharing on innovation. European Business Review, 22(3), 306–317.
• 58.   Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
• 59.   Kim, D. J., & Kogut, B. (1996). Technological platforms and diversification. Organization Science, 7(3), 283–301.
• 60.   Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2).
• 61.   Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct. The Academy of Management Review, 31(4).
• 62.   Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 586–599.
• 63.   Lenox, M., & King, A. (2004). Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 331–345.
• 64.   Samson, D. (1991). Manufacturing and operations strategy. Prentice Hall.
• 65.   Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 996–1004.
• 66.   Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38, 217–230.
• 67.   Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
• 68.   Ince, H., Imamoglu, S. Z., & Turkcan, H. (2016). The Effect of Technological Innovation Capabilities and Absorptive Capacity on Firm Innovativeness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 764–770.
• 69.   Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., Eze, U., & Lee, H. (2018). The Effect of IT Ambidexterity and Cloud Computing Absorptive Capacity on Competitive Advantage. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(3).
• 70.   Mayeh, M., Ramayah, T., & Popa, S. (2014). The Role of Absorptive Capacity in the Usage of a Complex Information System. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 20(6).
• 71.   Wang, W., Liu, L., Feng, Y., & Wang, T. (2014). Innovation with IS Usage: Individual Absorptive Capacity as a Mediator. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8).
• 72.   McCoy, C. (2010). Perceived self-efficacy and technology proficiency in undergraduate college students. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1614–1617.
• 73.   Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.
• 74.   Howell, D. W. (2016). Social media site use and the technology acceptance model: social media sites and organization success. (Doctoral dissertation).
• 75.   Kripanont, N. (2007). Examining a technology acceptance model of internet usage by academics within Thai business schools. (Doctoral dissertation).
• 76.   Alarcon-del-Amo, M., Lorenzo-Romero, C., & Del Chiappa, G. (2014). Adoption of social networking sites by Italian. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 12(2), 165–187.
• 77.   Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
• 78.   Kim, H., Choi, H., Han, J., & So, H. J. (2012). Enhancing teachers' ICT capacity for the 21st century learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6).
• 79.   Sena, J., & Sena, M. (2008). Corporate Social Networking. Issues in Information Systems, 9(2).
• 80.   Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113–143.
• 81.   Yoo, S. J., Han, S., & Huang, W. (2012). The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 942–950.
• 82.   Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
• 83.   Archambault, A., & Grudin, J. (2012). A longitudinal study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter use. Proceedings of CHI, 2741–2750.
• 84.   Tan, C. N.-L., & Md. Noor, S. (2013). Knowledge management enablers, knowledge sharing and research collaboration. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 251–276.
• 85.   Linzalone, R., Schiuma, G., & Ammirato, S. (2020). Connecting universities with entrepreneurship through digital learning platform. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
• 86.   Daft, R. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 193–210.
• 87.   Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2011). Managing innovation: Integrating, technological, market & organizational change (4th ed.). London: Wiley.
• 88.   Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge. (Original work published 1942).
• 89.   Menor, L. J., Tatikonda, M. V., & Sampson, S. E. (2002). New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Management, 20(2), 135–157.
• 90.   Martin, D., Gustafsson, A., & Choi, S. (2016). Service innovation, renewal, and adoption/rejection in dynamic global contexts. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2397–2400.
• 91.   Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
• 92.   Snyder, H., Witell, L., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Identifying categories of service innovation: a review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2401–2408.
• 93.   Avlonitis, G. J., Papastathopoulou, P. G., & Gounaris, S. P. (2001). An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(5), 324–342.
• 94.   Wang, C. C., Lo, S. K., & Fang, W. (2008). Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile telecommunication innovation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(2), 101–110.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding