Raghuram Menonh Senior Fellow, Plastic Surgent, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata 700160, West Bengal India., India
Gautam Biswas Senior Consultant, India
Gaurav Shetty Senior Fellow, India
Amrita Kaur Senior Fellow, India
Karnav Bharat Panchal unior Consultant, Plastic Surgent, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata 700160, West Bengal India, India
Address for correspondence: Raghuram Menonh, Senior Fellow, Plastic Surgent, Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata 700160, West Bengal India., India E-mail: rgplasticdoc@gmail.com
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Menon R, Biswas G, Shetty G, et al. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on outcome of extremity melanoma: a retrospective single centre experience. Indian J Canc Educ Res. 2023;11(1):17-22.
Timeline
Received : February 13, 2023
Accepted : March 02, 2023
Published : April 30, 2023
Abstract
Background: Since the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), its use as a standard of care for patients with clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma remains controversial in India. We wished to evaluate our experience of SLNB for extremity melanoma.
Methods: This is a retrospective study which was done at our centre from 2013 – 2020 by the Plastic surgery team.From 2013 to 2020, 44 patients (30 men and 14 women) with nonmetastatic melanoma underwent SLNB.
Result: From 2013 to 2020, 44 patients (30 men and 14 women) with non-metastatic melanoma underwent SLNB. The mean age was 56 +/− 16 (16 to 86). Positive sentinel nodes were identified in 12/44 (27%) patients. Single SLN was harvested in 67% of our cases, the mean number of SLN harvested was 1.5 +/− 1 in our study.
Conclusion: Our data confirm previous studies and support the clinical usefulness of SLNB as a reliable and accurate staging method in patients with cutaneous melanoma. However, the benefit of additional CLND in patients with positive SLN remains controversial.
References
1. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, Economou JS, Cagle LA, Storm FK, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992;127(4):392–399.
2. Sladden M, Zagarella S, Popescu CM, Bigby M. No survival benefit for patients with melanoma undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy: critical appraisal of the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial-I final report. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(3):566-571.
3. Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Andtbacka RH, Mozzillo N, Zager JS, et al. Completion dissection or observation for sentinel-node metastasis in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2211–2222.
4. Leiter U, Stadler R, Mauch C, Hohenberger W, Brockmeyer N, Berking C, et al. Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):757-767.
5. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, Sondak VK, Long GV, Ross MI, et al. Melanoma staging: evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):472–492.
6. Gershenwald JE, Thompson W, Mansfield PF, Lee JE, Colome MI, Tseng CH, et al. Multi-institutional melanoma lymphatic mapping experience: the prognostic value of sentinel lymph node status in 612 stage I or II melanoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):976–983.
7. Gershenwald JE, Andtbacka RH, Prieto VG, Johnson MM, Diwan AH, Lee JE, et al. Microscopic tumor burden in sentinel lymph nodes predicts synchronous nonsentinel lymph node involvement in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(26):4296–4303.
8. Kunte C, Geimer T, Baumert J, Konz B, Volkenandt M, Flaig M, et al. Analysis of predictive factors for the outcome of complete lymph node dissection in melanoma patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64(4):655–662.
9. Rhodes AR. Prognostic usefulness of sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients who have clinically node negative, localized, primary invasive cutaneous melanoma: a Bayesian analysis using informative published reports. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147(4):408–415.
10. Testori A, De Salvo GL, Montesco MC, Trifirò G, Mocellin S, Landi G, et al. Clinical considerations on sentinel node biopsy in melanoma from an Italian multicentric study on 1,313 patients (SOLISM-IMI). Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):2018–2027.
11. Delgado AF, Delgado AF. Complete lymph node dissection in melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(12):6825–6829.
12. Long GV, Hauschild A, Santinami M, Atkinson V, Mandala M, Chiarion-Sileni V, et al. Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1813–1823.
13. Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, Gogas HJ, Arance AM, Cowey CL, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1824–1835.
14. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, Thompson JF, Ding S, Byrd DR, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(14):2452–2459.
15. Kretschmer L, Thoms KM, Peeters S, Haenssle H, Bertsch HP, Emmert S. Postoperative morbidity of lymph node excision for cutaneous melanoma: sentinel lymphonodectomy versus complete regional lymph node dissection. Melanoma Res. 2008;18(1):16–21.
16. Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant therapy with nivolumab (NIVO) versus ipilimumab (IPI) after complete resection of stage III/IV melanoma: updated results from a phase III trial (CheckMate 238) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15 Suppl):9502.
17. Long GV, Hauschild A, Santinami M, et al. Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib in stage III BRAF-mutated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1813–1823.
18. Eggermont AM, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, et al. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1789–1801.
19. Farrow NE, Raman V, Williams TP, Nguyen KY, Tyler DS, Beasley GM. Adjuvant Therapy is Effective for Melanoma Patients with a Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Who Forego Completion Lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(13):5121-5125.
20. Biver-Dalle C, Puzenat E, Puyraveau M, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: our 8-year clinical experience in a single French institute (2002-2009). BMC Dermatol. 2012;12:21.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Menon R, Biswas G, Shetty G, et al. Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy on outcome of extremity melanoma: a retrospective single centre experience. Indian J Canc Educ Res. 2023;11(1):17-22.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.