Comparative Analysis of Hypofractionation versus Conventional Fractionation During Chest Wall Irradiation in Carcinoma Breast Patients: A Dosimetric and Clinical Study
Virendra Bhandar Professor Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College & PG Institute Indore., India
Amresh Kumar Registrar, India
Ruchi Sharma Sharma, India
Saloni Singhal Registrar, India
Mahendran null null, null
Ashar Iqbal Lodi null null, null
Mahendran null Medical Physicist cum RSO, India
Ashar Iqbal Lodi Registrar, India
Virendra Bhandari Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College & PG Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 453555, India, India
Address for correspondence: Virendra Bhandar, Professor Department of Radiation Oncology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College & PG Institute Indore., India E-mail: virencancer@yahoo.co.in
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Kumar A, Sharma R, Singhal S, et al. Comparative analysis of hypofractionation versus conventional fractionation during chest wall irradiation in carcinoma breast patients: a dosimetric and clinical study. Indian J Canc Educ Res. 2023;11(1):9-15.
Timeline
Received : January 06, 2023
Accepted : February 26, 2023
Published : February 28, 2023
Abstract
Introduction: Various dose fractionation schemes including conventional fractionation and hypofractionation, are in use for chest wall irradiation in carcinoma breast. Hypofractionation includes a higher dose per fraction with a smaller number of fractions with a biologically equivalent dose.
Aims: To study, analyse and compare the dosimetric and clinical outcomes using conventional fractionation versus hypofractionation. Methods and materials: This observational study includes 20 post-mastectomy patients and is randomized into two arms, with 10 patients in each arm. One arm received radiation as per conventional fractionation, and the other arm received it as per hypofractionation. 3 DCRT plans were generated, and doses to organs at risk were analysed and compared between the two groups. Patients were assessed for acute and late toxicities on follow-up, anda comparison was done between both groups.
Results: Mean dose (D mean) in ipsilateral spine, lung, esophagus, trachea, and, thyroid showed statistically significant difference. The V25 and D mean in the heart, Liver showed no statistically significant difference. Acute toxicities were higher in conventional groups, with higher grades, while late toxicities were equivalent.
Conclusion: Hypofractionation significantly reduces mean doses to organs at risk and toxicities, with comparable locoregional control; hence it is comparable to and can be used in place of conventional fractionation in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients for chest wall irradiation.
References
1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020
2. START Trialists' Group; Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, Barrett JM, Barrett-Lee PJ, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(4):331-341.
3. Li XA. Breast Cancer Atlas for Radiation Therapy Planning: Consensus Definitions [Internet]. [Place unknown]: [Publisher unknown]; [date unknown] [cited 2022 Sep 30]. p. 7-11.
4. National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2017 Nov [cited 2022 Oct
5. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(5):1341-1346.
6. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2087–2106.
7. Overgaard M, Bentzen SM, Christensen JJ, Madsen EH. The value of the NSD formula in equation of acute and late radiation complications in normal tissue following 2 and 5 fractions per week in breast cancer patients treated with postmastectomy irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 1987;9(1):1–11.
8. Bentzen SM, Saunders MI, Dische S. Repair halftimes estimated from observations of treatment-related morbidity after CHART or conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1999;53(3):219–226.
9. Yarnold J, Ashton A, Bliss J; START Trialists' Group. Fractionation sensitivity and dose response of late adverse effects in the breast after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: long-term results of a randomised trial. Radiother Oncol. 2005;75(1):9–17.
10. Owen JR, Ashton A, Bliss JM; START Trialists' Group. Effect of radiotherapy fraction size on tumour control in patients with early-stage breast cancer after local tumour excision: long-term results of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(6):467–471.
11. START Trialists' Group; Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, Barrett JM, Barrett-Lee PJ, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial B of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2008;371(9618):1098-1107.
12. Whelan T, MacKenzie R, Julian J, Levine M, Shelley W, Grimard L, et al. Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(15):1143-1150.
13. Haviland JS, Owen JR, Dewar JA, Agrawal RK, Barrett J, Barrett-Lee PJ, et al. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(11):1086–1094.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
Whether all authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar A, Sharma R, Singhal S, et al. Comparative analysis of hypofractionation versus conventional fractionation during chest wall irradiation in carcinoma breast patients: a dosimetric and clinical study. Indian J Canc Educ Res. 2023;11(1):9-15.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Comparison of acute toxicities between conventional and hypofractionation groups
Description: No description available.
Comparison of late toxicities between conventional and hypofractionation groups
Description: No description available.
3D-CRT field arrangement in a post-mastectomy breast cancer patient A. Cross-sectional view. B. Three dimensional view.
Description: No description available.
Dose volume histogram (DVH) comparing target volume coverage and doses to organs at risk in postmastectomy breast cancer patient undergoing radiation therapy using A. Conventional fractionation and B. Hypofractionation.