Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Impact of Government Policies and Programmes on Rural Youth Self-Employment Generation in Rural Nainital, Uttarakhand

Amit Kesarwani, Jayant Singh Farswan, Sneha Dohare

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Agriculture Business 12(1):p 21-28, January 2026. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijab.2454.7964.12126.3

How Cite This Article:

Jayant Singh Farswan, Amit Kesarwani, Sneha Dohare. Impact of Government Policies and Programmes on Rural Youth Self-Employment Generation in Rural Nainital, Uttarakhand. J Agri Busi 2026; 12(1): 21–28

Timeline

Received : September 25, 2025         Accepted : October 29, 2025          Published : June 20, 2026

Abstract

Background: Rural unemployment remains a key challenge in Uttarakhand, where many youths depend on seasonal farming and limited jobs. Promoting selfemployment offers a viable path to reduce migration and improve rural livelihoods. Aims: The study evaluates the effectiveness of government programmes PMEGP, MUDRA, and SVEP in generating self-employment among rural youth in Nainital district. Methods: Using purposive sampling, data were collected from 120 rural youths across hilly and plain zones through surveys and interviews. Descriptive statistics and percentage analysis were applied. Results: Only 18% of respondents were fully aware of self-employment schemes, while 49% remained uninformed. About 58% lacked vocational training, and 46% found existing programmes only moderately effective. Major barriers included lack of capital, weak infrastructure, and bureaucratic hurdles. Conclusion: Government initiatives can transform youth into entrepreneurs, but awareness, training, and credit access remain constraints. Localized outreach, simplified processes, and mentorship are vital for success.


References

  • 1.   Ahmad, S. B., & Yahiya, A. M. (2023). A study on youth perception and awareness towards entrepreneurship and government schemes in India with special reference to Dindigul district. Digital India: A Progress Towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 331-342.
  • 2.   Biswal, P., Sahoo, C. K., & Mishra, N. (2024). Participation among tribal youths of India in vocational training measures: A systematic review of literature. Evaluation and Program Planning, 104, 102530. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102530.
  • 3.   Dhasmana, P., & Bhandari, H. (2022). Hill tourism and its impact on economy and employment generation: A review of Almora district, Uttarakhand. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 8485-8493. https://doi. org/10.1149/10701.8485ecst
  • 4.   Ghosh, M., Lepakshi, H., Sanjana, S., & Bhaskar, A. A. (2021). A study on the financial and non-financial sectors of rural India. Catalyst - Journal of Business Management, 3(2), 1-20.
  • 5.   Ilahi, S. (2019). Rural entrepreneurship: The current scenario in India. International Journal of Science and Research, 8(11), 1428-1432.
  • 6.   Jaisankar, K., & Chandrasekaran, S. (2020). Training and awareness programs for rural entrepreneurship: A pathway to sustainable ventures. Journal of Rural Entrepreneurship Studies, 6(2), 58-66.
  • 7.   Joshi, N., Nautiyal, A., & Mehra, R. (2022). Challenges of rural entrepreneurship in Uttarakhand: A case study of the Kumaon region. Indian Journal of Development Research, 12(3), 89-97.
  • 8.   Kumar, G. A., Nain, M. S., Singh, R., Kumbhare, N. V., Parsad, R., & Kumar, S. (2021). Training effectiveness of skill development training programmes among the aspirational districts of Karnataka. Indian Journal of Extension Education, 57(4), 67-70.
  • 9.   Meera, H. N. (2017). A study on the impact of social background on rural entrepreneurship. International Journal of Research Culture Society, 1(7), 57-62.
  • 10.   Negi, A., & Singh, B. (2024). Entrepreneurship and self-employment potential among Uttarakhand youth under MUDRA and SVEP schemes. Economic Affairs, 69(1), 65-72.
  • 11.   Patidar, S. (2017). Opportunities available for entrepreneurs in India. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(5), 2390-2392
  • 12.   Patil, R., & Bhurke, V. (2019). Impact of rural entrepreneurship on migration: A case study of Dahanu, Maharashtra, India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(4), 500-503.
  • 13.   Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press of Harvard University
  • 14.   Radhakrishnan, P., & Arunachalam, R. (2017). Constraints perceived by the rural youth towards participation in rural development activities in Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Educational Science and Research, 7(2), 109-112.
  • 15.   Rawat, R., & Pandey, S. (2023). Youth migration and employment trends in Uttarakhand’s hill districts. Journal of Rural Studies, 102, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jrurstud.2023.01.004.
  • 16.   Saud, I. (2019). Rural entrepreneurship: The current scenario in India. International Journal of Science and Research, 8(11), 1428-1432.
  • 17.   Shivkumar, N. R. (2017). Poverty and employment generation in India. International Journal of Scientific Research in Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(4), 25-29.
  • 18.   Shrivastava, U., & Dwivedi, A. K. (2020). Manifestations of rural entrepreneurship: The journey so far and future pathways. Management Review Quarterly, 70(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00173-5.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Jayant Singh Farswan, Amit Kesarwani, Sneha Dohare. Impact of Government Policies and Programmes on Rural Youth Self-Employment Generation in Rural Nainital, Uttarakhand. J Agri Busi 2026; 12(1): 21–28


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
September 25, 2025 October 29, 2025 June 20, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijab.2454.7964.12126.3

Keywords

Self-EmploymentRural YouthGovernment PoliciesPmegpMudraSvepUttarakhandNainital

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Wednesday 17 June 2026, 04:32:16 (IST)


1765

Accesses

1
342
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received September 25, 2025
Accepted October 29, 2025
Published June 20, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share