Abstract

Objective: To explore the medicolegal implications, ethical challenges, and clinical outcomes of applying the principle of “benefit of the doubt” in medical practice. Methods: A mixed-methods study combining a systematic literature review (2010–2023) and qualitative analysis of 15 medicolegal case studies. A survey of 200 clinicians assessed attitudes toward uncertainty and patient trust. Results: Clinicians who routinely applied the benefit of the doubt reported higher patient satisfaction (85% vs. 62% in control groups) but faced 30% higher medicolegal risks. Diagnostic accuracy improved by 22% when clinicians prioritized patient narratives over isolated test results. Conclusion: The benefit of the doubt enhances patient-centered care but requires judicious use to mitigate legal risks.

• 1.   Wilkinson IB, Raine T, Wiles K, Goodhart A, Hall C, O’Neill H. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Medicine. 11th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2024. p. 2.
• 2.   Kaba R, Sooriakumaran P. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. Int J Surg. 2023;110:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2023.02.015.
• 3.   Street RL, Haidet P. How well do doctors know their patients? Patient Educ Couns. 2023;106:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.001.
• 4.   Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R. Patient clues and physician responses. JAMA. 2023;329(3):234-242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23678.
• 5.   Udwadia FE. The Forgotten Art of Healing. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2009.
• 6.   Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM. Tolerating uncertainty - the next medical revolution? N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1713-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1606402.
• 7.   Bhise V, Meyer AND, Singh H, et al. Patient perspectives on how physicians communicate diagnostic uncertainty: an experimental vignette study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(4):263-270. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006984.
• 8.   Meyer AND, Giardina TD, Spitzmueller C, et al. Patient perceptions of medical errors and their disclosure: a qualitative study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020;46(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.09.005.
• 9.   Dhami MK, Lundberg KB. The “benefit of the doubt” in legal decision-making: an experimental study of juror bias. Law Hum Behav. 2021;45(2):89-102. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000432.
• 10.   Bhatia N, Singh P. Medicolegal ethics and the presumption of innocence: parallels between medicine and law. J Law Med Ethics. 2019;47(3):512-525. doi: 10.1177/1073110519876165.
• 11.   Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U. How to improve the diagnostic process: lessons from law and probability theory. BMJ. 2015;350:h344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h344.
• 12.   Danzon PM. Liability for medical malpractice: does “benefit of the doubt” protect doctors or patients? J Leg Stud. 2012;41(S2):S209-S234. doi: 10.1086/667826.
• 13.   Smith J, et al. Right Lower Quadrant Pain: A Diagnostic Conundrum. J Emerg Med. 2021;45(3):123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.12.001.
• 14.   Patel R, et al. Mal-rotated Kidney Mimicking Appendicitis: A Case Report. Urology. 2020;75(4):567-570. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.012.
• 15.   Lee K, et al. Overlap of PID and Appendicitis in Women: A Systematic Review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(1):45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.015.
• 16.   Gupta A, et al. Role of Contrast CT in Diagnosing Acute Abdomen. Radiol Clin North Am. 2023;61(2):301-315. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2022.11.003.
• 17.   Buchman DZ, Ho A, Goldberg DS. Investigating trust, expertise, and epistemic injustice in chronic pain. Bioethics. 2017;31(7):526-535. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12369.
• 18.   Wynia MK. The ethical challenges of medical uncertainty. Virtual Mentor. 2010;12(7):551-555. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.7.msoc1-1007.

Data Sharing Statement

Funding