Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screw vs Multiple Cancellous Screw in Fracture Neck of Femur in Young Adults

Sanjul Bansal, Pradeep Choudhari, Mohit Mahoviya, Pravee Jain

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Journal of Orthopedic Education 9(3):p 157-164, September-December 2023. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/joe.2454.7956.9323.1

How Cite This Article:

Pradeep Choudhari, Mohit Mahoviya, Sanjul Bansal, et al. Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screw vs Multiple Cancellous Screw in Fracture Neck of Femur in Young Adults. Jr. Orth. Edu. 2023;9(3):157–164.

Timeline

Received : June 29, 2023         Accepted : August 08, 2023          Published : December 25, 2023

Abstract

Fracture neck of femur is a complex injury that predominantly affects young adults. Surgical management options include the use of dynamic hip screw (DHS) or multiple cancellous screw (MCS) fixation techniques. However, the optimal choice between these two approaches remains a subject of debate. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of using DHS versus MCS in young adults with fracture neck of femur. The study design was a comprehensive comparative analysis involving a thorough evaluation of medical records, patient demographics, surgical technique, and post-operative data collected over a specific period. Several clinical outcomes, including surgical time, perioperative blood loss, functional recovery, implant failure rates, and patient satisfaction ratings, were considered in the analysis. Results demonstrated that both DHS and MCS techniques yielded satisfactory outcomes in young adults with fracture neck of femur. However, certain differences were observed. The DHS technique exhibited advantages in terms of biomechanical stability and load sharing capacity, which can promote early mobilization and enhanced recovery. On the other hand, the MCS approach offered an alternative procedure that is less invasive, demands shorter surgical time, and presents minimal risk of avascular necrosis. A comparison of functional recovery indicated that patients treated with DHS achieved improved ambulation and quality of life compared to those treated with MCS. However, both techniques yielded similar rates of implant failure and overall patient satisfaction. These findings suggest that the optimal choice between DHS and MCS should be tailored to the individual patient, considering factors such as age, fracture pattern, bone quality, and surgeon expertise.


References

  • 1.   Fractures and dislocations of the hipin: campbells operative orthopaedics. Terrycanalles, beaty JH: editors. Pennsylvania. Mosby Elsevier. 2008; 3:3237–308.
  • 2.   Leighton RK. fractures of neck of femur in rockwood and greens fractures in adults. Bucholz RWheckman JD, courtbrown CM. Editors Philadelphia. Lippincot Williams and Wilkins. 2006;2:1753–92.
  • 3.   Protzman RR, Burkhalter WE. Femoral-neck fractures in young adults. J Bone Joint SurgAm 1976;58(5):689–95.
  • 4.   ThuanV, LyMF. Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracturesin Young Adults. JBone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:2254–66.
  • 5.   Dedrick DK, Mackenzie JR, Burney RE. Complications of femoral neck fracture inyoungadults. J Trauma 1986;26(10):932–7.
  • 6.   Zetterberg CH, IrstamL, Andersson GB. Femoral neck fractures in young adults. Acta Orthop Scand 1982;53(3):427–35.
  • 7.   Swiontkowski MF, Winquist RA, Hansen ST. Fractures of the femoral neck in patients between the ages of ~1047~ International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences twelve and forty-nine years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:837–46.
  • 8.   Luice RS, Burdick DC, Johnston RM. Early prediction of avascular necrosis of the femoral head following femoral neck fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics 1981.
  • 9.   Ross K Leighton; Bucholz RW, Heckman JD. Rockwood and Green‘s Fractures in Adults. Court brown CM: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
  • 10.   BehrJT, Dobozi WR, Badrinath K. The treatment of pathologic and impending pathologic fractures of the proximal femur in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res1985;198(198):173–8.
  • 11.   Jettoo P, James P. Dynamic hip screw Þxation versus multiple screw Þxation for intracapsular hip fracture. JOrthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2016;24(2):146–9.
  • 12.   Ly TV, Swiontkowski MF. Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. JBone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90(10):2254–66.
  • 13.   Szita J, Cserháti P, Bosch U, Manninger J, Bodzay T, Fekete K. Intracapsular femoral neck fractures: the importance of early reduction and stable osteosynthesis. Injury 2002;33(3):C41–6.
  • 14.   SinghM, SonkarD, VermaR, ShuklaJ, GaurS. Comparison of the functional outcome of DHS versus cannulated cancellous screws in pauwels type II and III fracture neck femur in young adults. Int J Orthop Sci 2017; 3(2):745– 9.
  • 15.   PatilP, ShivadeN, NikamM. Comparative study of treatment outcomes of femur neck fracture with dynamic hip screws versus multiple cancellous cannulated screws. Int JHealth Sci (IJHS) 2022;7050–8.
  • 16.   LondheDP, Mangukiya DHJ, Agrawal DB, Shrivastava DA. Comparison of radiological and functional outcome in patients with femoral neck fracture operated with dynamic hip screw versus multipl ecannulated screws. Int J Orthop Sci2018; 4 (2.8):1040–8.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Pradeep Choudhari, Mohit Mahoviya, Sanjul Bansal, et al. Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screw vs Multiple Cancellous Screw in Fracture Neck of Femur in Young Adults. Jr. Orth. Edu. 2023;9(3):157–164.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
June 29, 2023 August 08, 2023 December 25, 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/joe.2454.7956.9323.1

Keywords

Dynamic hip screwCancellous screwsNeck of femur fracture

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 22 August 2026, 02:09:43 (IST)


1965

Accesses

3
237
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received June 29, 2023
Accepted August 08, 2023
Published December 25, 2023

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share