Comparative Analysis of Efficacy & Post-Operative Analgesia with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Nalbuphine Combination Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Combination in Infraumbilical Surgeries
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Siddique W Khan, Madhuri Pramad Lonikar, Rangerz Aarif AN AB Razzaque/Comparative Analysis of Effcacy & Post -operative Analgesia with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Nalbuphine Combination versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Combination in Infraumbilical Surgeries/Indian J Anesth Analg. 2023;10(2)55-61
Timeline
Received : April 03, 2023
Accepted : April 18, 2023
Published : May 09, 2023
Abstract
Spinal anaesthesia is one of the most commonly used technique for lower abdominal and lower limbs surgeries. However its short duration of action and early arising post-operative pain moves the focus towards the use of adjuvant to it. So numbers of adjuvant from different groups were used and evaluated. Out of which opioids are the most commonly used family as an intrathecal adjuvant to local anaesthetics. Our aim of the study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of hyperbaric Bupivacaine & Nalbuphine versus hypebaric Bupivacaine & Fentanyl in infraumbilical surgeries. The study was conducted during period of 2020 to 2022 at tertiary care center. Total 100 patients were participated in study each group includes 50. Demographic data, onset of sensory & motor block, duration of sensory and motor block, two segment regression time and first rescue analgesia time were noted. The onset of sensory and motor block was earlier in Bupivacaine plus Nalbuphine (BN) combination as compared to Fentanyl plus Bupivacaine (BF) combination. Two segment regression time was longer with BN group. Nalbuphine also shows good hemodynamic stability. Rescue analgesia time with Nalbuphine was much longer than Fentanyl. The adverse effect was also much less with Nalbuphine. Nalbuphine could be a better and settle alternative to the Fentanyl and other opioids as adjuvant to intrathecal local anaesthetics.
References
1. Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;85(1):109–17.
2. Verstraete S, Van de Velde M. Post-cesarean section analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63(3):147–67.
3. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Morgan & Mikhail's Clinical Anesthesiology. 6th ed. New York (NY): McGraw Hill Education; 2018. p. 959–94.
4. Yallapragada SV, Vemuri NN, Shaik MS. Effect of adding clonidine to intrathecal bupivacaine on the quality of subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 May-Aug;10(2):451–4.
5. Bakshi U, Chatterkee S, Sengupta S, Gupta D. Adjuvant drugs in central neuraxial analgesia − a review. Int J Anesthesiol. 2009;26(1):1–10.
6. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids, Horlocker TT, Burton AW, Connis RT, Hughes SC, Nickinovich DG, et al. Practice guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression associated with neuraxial opioid administration. Anesthesiology. 2009 Feb;110(2):218–30.
7. Stoelting RK, Hillier SC. Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. p. 217–50.
8. Nimmo WS, Rowbotham DJ, Smith G, editors. Wylie and Churchill-Davidson’s A Practice of Anesthesia. 7th ed. London: Arnold Publishers; 2004. p. 600–20.
9. Gunion MW, Marchionne AM, Anderson CT. Use of the mixed agonist antagonist nalbuphine in opioid based analgesia. Acute Pain. 2004;6(1):29–39.
10. Charuluxananan S, Kyokong O, Somboonviboon W, Poompruet S, Laungrojanapian W, Sringam P, et al. Nalbuphine versus ondansetron for prevention of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after caesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):264–9.
11. Maltby JR. Notable Names in Anaesthesia. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited; 2002. p. 512–8.
12. Lee JA, Atkinson RS. Textbook of Anaesthesia. Anatomy. In: MacIntosh R, Muspratt F, editors. Lumbar Puncture and Spinal Analgesia. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2001. p. [Pages based on context: 217–50].
17. Stoelting RK. Pharmacology and Physiology in Anaesthetic Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven; 1999. p. 158–79.
18. Sharma A, Chaudhary S, Kumar M, Kapoor R. Comparison of nalbuphine versus fentanyl as intrathecal adjuvant to bupivacaine for orthopedic surgeries: A randomized controlled double-blind trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):529–36.
19. Gonano C, Leitgeb U, Sitzwohl C, Ihra G, Weinstabl C, Kettner SC. Spinal versus general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: Anesthesia drug and supply costs. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):524–9.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
Information not provided.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Siddique W Khan, Madhuri Pramad Lonikar, Rangerz Aarif AN AB Razzaque/Comparative Analysis of Effcacy & Post -operative Analgesia with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Nalbuphine Combination versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and Fentanyl Combination in Infraumbilical Surgeries/Indian J Anesth Analg. 2023;10(2)55-61
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.