Ravindra D Bansod Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra 413722, India
Address for correspondence: Ravindra D Bansod, Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra 413722, India E-mail: rtuljapur1808@gmail.com
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
Indian Journal of Waste Management
6(2):p 45-49, July-December 2022. | DOI: NA
How Cite This Article:
Ravindra D Bansod/Uniformity Evaluation of Water Application to Cauliflower/Indian Journal of Waste Management. 2022;6(2):45–49.
Timeline
Received : October 25, 2022
Accepted : November 11, 2022
Published : December 30, 2022
Abstract
Cauliflower is a reach source of vitamin B and protein and is a main horticultural crop. Its production can be increased by application of irrigation water with required quantity at right time by right method. Irrigation scheduling, considering crop water requirement, plays a vital role in crop production. The microsprinkler irrigation was used for water application to cauliflower and the treatments were based on different microsprinkler spacings i.e. 8m × 8m (T1), 7m × 7m (T2), 6m × 6m (T3), 5m × 5m (T4), 4m × 4m (T5) and 3m × 3m (T6). The water depth applied in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 was 17.1, 18.2, 19.9, 22.1, 26.6 and 32.9 cm, respectively. The cauliflower yield obtained in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6 was 22.82, 23.80, 28.13, 31.70, 29.00 and 26.40 tonne/ha, respectively. The maximum water use efficiency, 1.43 tonne/ha-cm, was recorded in T4. Based on Uniformity Coefficient (UCC), depth of water application ( x ) and actual yield (Y), the production of cauliflower can be predicted as Y = –200.531 + 4.083 x + 0.0081 x 2 {1 +1.570 (1- UCC/100)2}.
References
1. Christiansen, J.E., 1941. The uniformity of application of water sprinkler systems. Agril. Engg. 22(3):89-92
2. Deepak Singh, Neelam Patel, Sridhar Patra and Nisha Singh (2020). Growth and yield of cauliflower under surface and subsurface drip irrigation.., Current Science, 2020 vol.119, No. 8: 1357-1363.
3. Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper 33, Rome
4. Hanks R.J. and Rasmussen, V.P., 1982. Predicting crop production as related to plant water stress. Adv. Agron. 35: 193-215.
6. Howell, D.T., 1967. Sprinkler nonuniformity characteristics and yield. J. a. Irrigation and drainage division ASCE. (IR8):55- 56
7. Howell T.A., 1990. Relationship between crop production and transpiration, evaporation a. and irrigation. In: Stewart, B.A., Nielsen, D.R.. Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 391-434.
8. Hexem, R.W. and E.O. Heady. 1978. Water production function for irrigated a. agriculture. Iowa State University Press. Ames.
9. Li, Jiusheng, 1998. Modeling crop yield as affected by uniformity of sprinkler irrigation a. system. Journal of Agricultural W 38 : 135-146
10. M.S. Al-Jamal, Shelly Ball and Ted W.Sammis (2001). Comparison of sprinkler, trickle and furrow irrigation efficiencies for onion production. Irrigation Water Management. 2001 Vol. 46 No.3 : 253-266.
11. Manjunatha, M.V., 1998. Studies on Testing and applicability of microsorinklers a. and other irrigation systems in Sweet lime intercropping. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar
12. Manju Kumari and Meera Devi (2020). Scheduling of irrigation in Cauliflower under mid hill condition in Himachal Pradesh. Int. Jou. of Curr. Microbiol.app.Science. 2020. Vo.9 No.6: 765-773.
13. Mantovani, E.C., Villalobos, F.J., Orgaz. F., Fereres 1995. Modeling the effects of a. sprinkler irrigation uniformity on crop yield. Agril. Water Manage. 27:243-257.
14. Mintu Job, D.K.Rusia, Dinmani and Vikas Kumar Singh (2018).Effect of drip irrigation and plastic mulch on yield, water use efficiency of cauliflower. Journal of Pharmocognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; SPI: 2556-2560.
15. Patil, P.D., Suryawanshi, S.N. and R.D.Bansod, 2003. Response of chilli, for biometric a. development, to water stress. Pantnagar Journal of Research. 1 (1):118-120
16. Pawar, D.D. and P.G. Bhoi, 2001. Studies on water production function for potato under different irrigation methods. Annual Research Review Committee Report. (All India Co-ordinated Project for Research on Water Management, M.P.K.V., Rahuri), pp. 2-11.
17. Renu Kumari, P.S.Shekhawat and Sonu Jain (2021): An economic analysis of production of cauliflower in Sikar district of rajasthan. Economic affairs. 2021. vol. 66, no.4, :532-542.
18. Wang, Y., Lei. Z., Yang, S., 1997. Cumulative function of sensitive index for winter wheat. J.Hydraulic Eng. (China) 5: 28-35.
Data Sharing Statement
There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.
Funding
This research received no funding.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.
Ethics Declaration
This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest in this work.
About this article
Cite this article
Ravindra D Bansod/Uniformity Evaluation of Water Application to Cauliflower/Indian Journal of Waste Management. 2022;6(2):45–49.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.
This license enables
reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium
or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is
given to the creator.