Babita Ramdev, Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (MMIMSR), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana 133207, India , Manisha B. Dwivedi1 , Babita Ramdev2 , Harinder Singh3 , Dinesh Kumar Sharma4 , Inderja5 , Pranav Arora6 , Megha Singla7 , Heena Goyal8
Introduction: Various intravenous induction agents like propofol, ketamine and etomidate are available now a day to the anaesthetist but they also cause attenuation of axis leading to a decrease in heart rate and blood pressure. To achieve haemodynamic stability during induction is one of the major challenge and goal of the anaesthetist. Aims and objectives: To evaluate the hemodynamic effect of propofol and etofol as induction agents in elective surgeries under general anaesthesia . Material and Methodology: Sixty (60) ASA grade I and II patients of age group (1860 years) were divided randomly into two study groups of thirty patients each, as follows: Group IPropofol 2 mg/kg was given intravenously as induction agent Group IIEtofol (0.15mg/kg etomidate and 1mg/kg propofol) was given intravenously as induction agent. Results: In group II ( Etofol) lesser fall in haemodynamic parameters at induction and upto 60 minutes (p>0.05)of induction as compared to group I (Propofol). Conclusion: Etofol is more haemodynamically stable than propofol alone during induction.
No records found.
| Received | Accepted | Published |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A |
Monday 13 July 2026, 05:07:30 (IST)
Download citation
Highlight selected keywords in the article text.
| Received | N/A |
| Accepted | N/A |
| Published | N/A |