Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Surgeons’ Perspectives on Cadaveric Dissection in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Study

Soumitra Trivedi, Ripudaman Arora, Mrithunjay Rathore

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Indian Journal of Anatomy 14(3):p 87-93, Sept. Dec 2025. | DOI: 10.21088/ija.2320.0022.14325.2

How Cite This Article:

Soumitra Trivedi, Ripudaman Arora, Mrithunjay Rathore. Surgeons’ Perspectives on Cadaveric Dissection in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ind Jr Anat. 2025; 14(3): 87-93.

Timeline

Received : August 04, 2025         Accepted : September 05, 2025          Published : December 30, 2025

Abstract

Background: Cadaveric dissection remains a cornerstone of medical education, offering unparalleled anatomical insight, though its relevance is debated with advancements in digital simulation. This study evaluates surgeons’ perceptions of cadaveric dissection’s educational value during workshops. Aim: To assess the educational benefits of cadaveric dissection in surgical training at the Department of Anatomy, AIIMS Raipur. Objectives: 1. Evaluate the role of cadaveric dissection in enhancing surgical skills. 2. Assess its contribution to anatomical understanding. 3. Compare its effectiveness against digital simulation tools. Material: A cross-sectional study was conducted with surgeons participating in cadaver-based workshops at AIIMS Raipur. A structured questionnaire assessed perceptions of educational value. Data were analyzed using Chi-square goodnessof-fit tests (p < 0.05). Result: Among sixty four respondents, there was strong consensus supporting cadaveric dissection’s educational value (p < 0.001). Surgeons emphasized its critical role in deepening anatomical knowledge and refining surgical techniques, citing hands-on experience as superior to digital alternatives. No significant differences were found across experience levels or specialties, indicating broad agreement on its utility


References

  • 1.   Kalthur S.G., Pandey A.K., Prabhath S. Cadaveric dissection in medical education: A historical perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2022; 15(1): 22-30.
  • 2.   Farfán E., Vargas M., Fernández J. Anatomical dissection and its impact on surgical proficiency. Clin Anat. 2023; 36(2): 88-95.
  • 3.   Asante E.A., Chen Y., Lee M.J. The role of cadaveric dissection in modern medical education. J Med Educ. 2021; 20(3): 45-52.
  • 4.   Ghazanfar H., Rashid S., Hussain A. Cadaveric dissection for surgical training: A systematic review. Med Teach. 2018; 40(6): 567-73.
  • 5.   American College of Surgeons. Guidelines for cadaver-based surgical training. Chicago: ACS Publications; 2023.
  • 6.   Balta J.Y., Cronin M., Cryan J.F. Cadaver-based simulation in surgical training. Surg Educ. 2017; 15(4): 201-9.
  • 7.   Sharma A., Kumar P., Singh R. Cadaveric workshops for neurosurgical training. J Neurosurg Sci. 2020; 64(5): 432-8.
  • 8.   Biasutto S.N., Sharma N., McBride J. Teaching anatomy: Cadavers vs. computers? Ann Anat. 2014; 196(4): 237-41.
  • 9.   Nwachukwu C., Lachance S., Lee K. Cadaveric vs. virtual reality training in arthroscopy. J Orthop Res. 2023; 41(7): 1420-8.
  • 10.   Balta J.Y., Twomey M., Moloney F. Cadaverbased simulation for surgical training: A review. Surg Innov. 2021; 28(5): 622-30.
  • 11.   Kumar R., Singh A., Pandey S. Controlled cadaveric exposure for first-year medical students. Med Educ Online. 2023; 28(1): 215-23.
  • 12.   Goyal S., Patel R., Singh V. Role of cadaveric labs in neurosurgical training. J Neurosurg Sci. 2022; 66(4): 298-305.
  • 13.   Chen J., Wong A., Lee S. Cadaveric workshops for reconstructive surgery training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 153(2): 345-52.
  • 14.   Sugand K., Abrahams P., Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010; 3(2): 83-93
  • 15.   McLachlan J.C., Bligh J, Bradley P. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ. 2004;
  • 16.   Eisma R., Wilkinson T. From “silent teachers” to models: Cadaveric dissection in surgical training. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(10): e1001748.
  • 17.   Horiuchi-Hirose M., Fukuoka T., Shinji K. Learning outcomes of nursing students’ experience with cadaveric dissection: A scoping review. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024; 10: 23779608241274543.
  • 18.   Jeyakumar J., Dissanayake M. Dissection in the modern medical curriculum: An exploration into student perception and adaptations for the future. Anat Sci Educ. 2020; 13(3): 366-74.
  • 19.   BMJ. The first patient: Cadaveric dissection in medical education. BMJ. 2024; 368: m1234.
  • 20.   Fruhstorfer B.H., Palmer J., Brydges S. Emotional impact of cadaveric dissection on medical students. Clin Anat. 2011; 24(6): 747-53.
  • 21.   Asante E.A., Maalman R.S., Ali M.A., Donkor Y.O., Korpisah J.K. Perception and Attitude of Medical Students towards Cadaveric Dissection in Anatomical Science Education. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021; 31(4): 867-874. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i4.22.
  • 22.   Solanke K., Kulkarni D., Shekokar A. Role of traditional cadaveric dissection in learning – Perceptions of 1st MBBS students. MedPulse Int J Anat. 2018; 7(1).
  • 23.   Kochhar S., Tasnim T., Gupta A. Is cadaveric dissection essential in medical education? A qualitative survey comparing pre-and postCOVID-19 anatomy courses. J Osteopath Med. 2022; 122(10): 557-564. DOI: 10.1515/jom-2022- 0016

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Soumitra Trivedi, Ripudaman Arora, Mrithunjay Rathore. Surgeons’ Perspectives on Cadaveric Dissection in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ind Jr Anat. 2025; 14(3): 87-93.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Received Accepted Published
August 04, 2025 September 05, 2025 December 30, 2025

DOI: 10.21088/ija.2320.0022.14325.2

Keywords

Cadaveric dissectionSurgical educationSkill developmentMedical educationVirtual anatomy

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Saturday 28 February 2026, 04:11:02 (IST)


949

Accesses

8
134
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received August 04, 2025
Accepted September 05, 2025
Published December 30, 2025

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.



Access this article



Share