Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Is Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia a Better Alternative to General Anesthesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy Surgeries?

Gunaseelan S., Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwara Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry 605102, India. , Jalakandan B.1 , Gunaseelan S.2 , Raghuraman3

Author Information

Licence:




Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 5(10):p 1757-1764, Oct 2018. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.51018.27

How Cite This Article:


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

  Background and objectives: Though the breast surgeries are usually performed under general anesthesia (GA), it is not without any attendant risks. Thoracic Epidural anesthesia (TEA) is gaining more attention in view of better intraoperative conditions, postoperative recovery profile and fewer postoperative complications. This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of TEA as an alternative anesthetic technique to GA for Modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Methodology: Group G (n = 25) was administered conventional GA. The Group T (n = 25) received TEA with 0.25% Bupivacaine and Fentanyl. Postoperative pain management was provided with Tramadol for GA patients and epidural infusion for TEA patients. The need for anesthesia supplementation, sedation, hemodynamic changes, respiratory depression and other intercurrences like pruritus, nausea, vomiting were recorded. The duration of surgery, length of stay in the recovery room and quality of post­operative analgesia were also recorded. Results: In group T, Supplementation with axillary infiltration was required in 20% of patients and all patients required sedation. Hypertension was more frequent in group G, whereas hypotension and bradycardia were more frequent in group T. Postoperatively, the incidence of nausea and vomiting were observed frequently in group G. The group G patients had longer duration of stay in recovery room (202.32 vs 160.80 minutes). The Visual Analog scores and requirement of supplementary analgesics upto 24 hours of postoperative period were significantly lower in group T patients. Conclusion: TEA is a safe, reliable and better alternative to GA in patients undergoing MRM. 


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.51018.27

Keywords

General Anesthesia; Modified Radical Mastectomy; Postoperative Analgesia; Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 13 July 2026, 11:08:43 (IST)


5651

Accesses

6
678
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share