Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Evaluation of low dose Bupivacaine with Tramadol as an Alternative to Conventional dose of Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for TURP

Ravi Madhusudhana , Sushma Bandreddy1 , Ravi Madhusudhana2

Author Information

Licence:




Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 6(3):p 852-868, May-June 2019. | DOI: 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6319.24

How Cite This Article:

Sushma Bandreddy, Ravi Madhusudhana. Evaluation of low dose Bupivacaine with Tramadol as an Alternative to Conventional
dose of Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for TURP. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2019;6(3):852-860
 


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Context: SAB is safe and effective technique for TURP, offers advantage of easy identification of TURP syndrome, bladder perforations but, associated with hemodynamic changes like hypotension and bradycardia in geriatric patients with coexisting cardiac and respiratory diseases. Hence the study had been undertaken with low dose bupivacaine in combination with tramadol. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy of very low dose bupivacaine with tramadol as an alternative to conventional dose of bupivacaine in TURP surgeries. Settings and Design: Randomised double blind prospective study. Methods and Material: 64 patients scheduled for TURP surgeries, aged 55-75 years with ASA-PS I and II were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups. Group I-injection bupivacaine 0.5 ml (2.5 mg)+ preservative free tramadol 1 ml (50 mg) diluted with 0.5 ml NS intrathecally. Group II-injection bupivacaine 2 ml (10 mg) intrathecally. Statistical analysis used: Data analysis: SPSS 22 version software; Categorical data: frequencies and proportions; Continuous data:mean+ SD. Tests of significance: Chisquare test and independent t test. p value < 0.05: statistically significant. Results: Attainment of sensory blockade in group I was slow ie., 8.44 ± 2.35 min compared to that in group II ie., 6.53 ± 1.65 min and the two segment regression is faster in group I ie., 65.38 ± 20.52 min compared that of group II ie., 86.78 ± 36.88 min which were statistically significant. The time for rescue analgesia was significantly higher in group I ie., 312.56 ± 137.42 min compared to group II ie., 256.97 ± 130.46 min. The degree of motor blockade was less in group I. There were no significant changes in heart rate and SpO2, but the fall in MAP in group II was significant compared to that in group I. Conclusions: 50 mg preservative free Tramadol added to intrathecal bupivacaine 2.5 mg offers adequate anaesthesia, stable hemodynamics, early ambulation and prolongs analgesia.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article

Sushma Bandreddy, Ravi Madhusudhana. Evaluation of low dose Bupivacaine with Tramadol as an Alternative to Conventional
dose of Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for TURP. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2019;6(3):852-860
 


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: 10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6319.24

Keywords

Bupivacaine; Spinal Anaesthesia; Tramadol.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 14 July 2026, 08:19:41 (IST)


5689

Accesses

6
679
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share