Full Text (PDF)
Review Article

Ethics vs. Negligence in Medicine

Shri Gopal Kabra, Vivekanshu Verma

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Journal of Global Public Health 8(1):p 13-24, January-June 2026. | DOI: na

How Cite This Article:

Shri Gopal Kabra, Vivekanshu Verma. Ethics vs. Negligence in Medicine. Jr of Glob Pub Hea. 2026; 8(1): 13–24.

Timeline

Received : February 13, 2026         Accepted : March 15, 2026          Published : June 30, 2026

Abstract

Background: Medical negligence is traditionally adjudicated as a breach of contractual duty under consumer protection and tort law. Medical ethics, however, is the prerogative of professional councils, serving as a moral and disciplinary framework. The overlap between these domains raises questions about whether invoking ethics in negligence adjudication is justified. Objective: To critically examine the relationship between medical ethics and medical negligence, and to debate whether ethical codes should influence legal adjudication of negligence in a transactional, contract-based framework of medical services. Methods: An AI-mediated debate format was employed to analyze conceptual distinctions between ethics and law, the custodial role of medical councils, and the contractual nature of medical consent post-Consumer Protection Act. Comparative reasoning and jurisprudential references were used to highlight overlaps and divergences. Results: Findings suggest that: • Medical negligence is primarily a breach of duty of care under contract law, adjudicated by courts. • Breach of ethics is professional misconduct, adjudicated by medical councils, and does not necessarily involve patient harm. • Ethical codes often serve as benchmarks for defining “reasonable care” in negligence cases, creating overlap. • The shift from fiduciary trust to contractual consent has diluted the moral component of medical practice, but ethics remains essential to preserve professional integrity. Conclusion: While medical negligence and ethical misconduct are distinct, ethics provides the normative standards against which negligence is judged. Invoking ethics in negligence adjudication is not about conflating domains, but about ensuring that contractual medicine does not lose its fiduciary essence. Courts and councils thus operate in parallel, with ethics guiding standards and law enforcing liability.


References

  • 1.   Nandimath, OV. Thomas, Alexander. HC, Arpitha. Health Law And Ethics Thomson Reuters, 2022.
  • 2.   NMC Code of Medical Ethics Regulations, 2002 https://www.nmc.org.in/rules-regulations/ code-of-medical-ethics-regulations-2002/
  • 3.   Medical Negligence – Judicial Approach by Indian Courts https://asiindia.org/medicalnegligence-the-judicial-approach-by-indiancourts/
  • 4.   Pandit MS, Pandit S. Medical negligence: Coverage of the profession, duties, ethics, case law, and enlightened defense - A legal perspective. Indian J Urol. 2009 Jul;25(3):372-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.56206. PMID: 19881134; PMCID: PMC2779963. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2779963/
  • 5.   https://simonlawpc.com/blog/medicalmalpractice/malpractice-vs-negligence/
  • 6.   Subrahmanyam BV. Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab, the judgment stipulates the guidelines to be followed before launching a prosecution against a doctor for negligence. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2013 Jan;4(1):99-100. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.105639. PMID: 23546375; PMCID: PMC3579074. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3579074/
  • 7.   Kabra, SG. Verma, V. Medical Negligence & Judicial Overreach. Redflower. 2025. In Medical Practice, Ethics & Laws. Chapter 21, p. 247-64.
  • 8.   Proforma For Submitting Appeal Cases Under Section 8.7 & 8.8 Of Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette And Ethics) Regulations, 2002.
  • 9.   https://www.nmc.org.in/MCIRest/open/ge tDocument?path=%2FDocuments%2FPublic% 2FPortal%2FApplicationForm%2FPdf%2Fethics.pdf
  • 10.   Varghese, AM, Vaswani, VR. Kumar, BR. Shenoy, Venkatkrishna. Awareness and Attitude of Medical Negligence and Medical Ethics among Interns and Resident Doctors. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2016) 5(11): 532-535. https://www.ijcmas.com/5-11-2016/ Alex. M. Varghese, et al.pdf
  • 11.   Malik, Y. Nag, VL, Singh, SP. Professional Conduct Review by Ethics & Medical Registration Board. NMC E- Book. Vol- 1, Publication Division, National Medical Commission 2023. https://drugscontrol.org/pdf/nmc_e-book.pdf
  • 12.   Gajbhiye, S. Patond, S. Medico-Legal Aspects of Medical Negligence amongst Medical Students, J Res Med Dent Sci, 2022, 10 (7): 226-230 https://www.jrmds.in/articles/medicolegal-aspects-of-medical-negligenceamongst-medical-students-93752.html
  • 13.   Section 30 (2). National Medical Commission (NMC) Act, 2019.
  • 14.   Prasad, KK. Supreme Court and Medical Negligence: Necessary Protection or License to Kill. Manuputra. 2026. https://articles. manupatra.com/article-details/SupremeCourt-and-Medical-Negligence-NecessaryProtection-or-License-to-Kill

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Shri Gopal Kabra, Vivekanshu Verma. Ethics vs. Negligence in Medicine. Jr of Glob Pub Hea. 2026; 8(1): 13–24.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
February 13, 2026 March 15, 2026 June 30, 2026

DOI: na

Keywords

Medical ethicsMedical negligenceProfessional misconductDuty of careConsumer Protection Act (CPA)Contractual consentFiduciary trustNational Medical Commission (NMC)Law and ethics interfaceProfessional accountability

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 27 July 2026, 14:05:54 (IST)


475

Accesses

7
71
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received February 13, 2026
Accepted March 15, 2026
Published June 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share