Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparison of Tricuspid Annular Systolic Excursion Measurement between Transthoracic and Transesophageal Ecocardiography in the Perioperative setting

Gayatri Balabantaray, Chaitali SenDasgupta

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 12(3):p 207-215, July-Sept. 2025. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.12325.6

How Cite This Article:

Balabantaray G, SenDasgupta C. Comparison of tricuspid annular systolic excursion measurement between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the perioperative setting. Ind J Anesth Analg. 2025;12(3):207-215.

Timeline

Received : February 24, 2025         Accepted : May 30, 2025          Published : September 11, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) is measured in apical 4-chamber (4CH) view in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). In Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), it is measured by Mid esophageal 4 chamber view (ME 4CH) and modified deep transgastric (dTG) view. The aim of our study was tocompare different methods of TAPSE measurement. Materials and methods: Patients posted for elective Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (OPCAB) were included in the study. TAPSE was measured after induction by TTE (4CH) view preoperatively and by TEE (ME 4CH and dTG) both preoperatively and postoperatively. Result and analysis: Measurements in dTG RV view at 0° showed best agreement with standard TTE measurements with intraclass-correlation 0.987 and 95% confidence interval 0.917-0.995. In Mid Esophageal Four Chamber (ME 4CH) view showed agreement of measurements with intraclass-correlation 0.904 and 95% confidence interval - 0.096-0.977 and on average estimated TAPSE values 1.54 mm lower than TTE. TAPSE by pre-operative Mid Esophageal Four Chamber (ME 4CH) view and Deep Transgastric Right Ventricular view suggested strong positive correlation by intraclass-correlation 0.945 with a 95% confidence interval of -0.013 to 0.987. In post-operative period Mid Esophageal Four Chamber (ME 4CH) view and Deep Transgastric Right Ventricular view suggested intraclasscorrelation 0.945 and 95% confidence interval -0.015 to 0.987. Conclusion: Evaluation of RV function by means of TAPSE measurement in TEE can be performed with an excellent level of agreement compared to TTE.


References

  • 1.   Denault A.Y., Haddad F., Jacobsohn E., Deschamps A. (2013) Perioperative right ventricular dysfunction. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 26(1): 71–81.
  • 2.   Vandenheuvel M.A., Bouchez S., Wouters P.F., De Hert S.G. (2013) A pathophysiological approach towards right ventricular functionand failure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 30(7): 386–394.
  • 3.   Haddad F., Elmi-Sarabi M., Fadel E., Mercier O., Denault A.Y. (2016) Pearls and pitfalls in managing right heart failure in cardiac surgery. CurrOpinAnaesthesiol 29(1): 68–79.
  • 4.   Lella L.K., Sales V.L., Goldsmith Y., Chan J., Iskandir M., Gulkarov I., Tortolani A., Brener S.J., Sacchi T.J., Heitner J.F. (2015) Reducedright ventricular function predicts long-term cardiac re-hospitalizationafter cardiac surgery. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0132808.
  • 5.   Forner A. Agreement of tricuspid annular systolic excursion measurement between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the perioperative setting: In Int j cardiovascular imaging: Berlin: Springer; 2017: 1128-9.
  • 6.   Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Mor-Avi V., Afilalo J., Armstrong A.,Ernande L, Flachskampf F.A., Foster E., Goldstein S.A., Kuznetsova T., Lancellotti P., Muraru D., Picard M.H., Rietzschel E.R., Rudski L., Spencer K.T., Tsang W., Voigt J.U. (2015) Recommendationsfor cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiographyin adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiographyand the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am SocEchocardiogr 28 (1): 1–39 e14.
  • 7.   Rudski L.G., Lai W.W., Afilalo J., Hua L., Handschumacher M.D., Chandrasekaran K., Solomon S.D., Louie E.K., Schiller N.B. (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology,and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am SocEchocardiogr 23 (7): 685–713.
  • 8.   Kaul S., Tei C., Hopkins J.M., Shah P.M. (1984) Assessment of right ventricular function using two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 107(3): 526–531
  • 9.   Ho S.Y., Nihoyannopoulos P. (2006) Anatomy, echocardiography, and normal right ventricular dimensions. Heart 92 (Suppl 1): i2–i13.
  • 10.   Leather H.A., Ama R., Missant C., Rex S., Rademakers F.E., Wouters P.F. (2006) Longitudinal but not circumferential deformation reflects global contractile function in the right ventriclewith open pericardium. Am J Physiol Heart CircPhysiol 290(6): H2369–H2375.
  • 11.   Hashimoto I., Watanabe K. (2016) Geometryrelated right ventricular systolic function assessed by longitudinal and radialright ventricular contractions. Echocardiography 33(2): 299–306.
  • 12.   Wouters P. (2010) The right ventricle. In: Feneck R.O., Kneeshaw J., Ranucci M. (eds) Core topics in transesophagealechocardiography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, p416.
  • 13.   Carerj S., Micari A., Trono A., Giordano G., Cerrito M., Zito C., Luzza F., Coglitore S, Arrigo F., Oreto G. (2003) Anatomical M-mode: An old-new technique. Echocardiography20(4): 357–361.
  • 14.   Donal E., Coisne D., Pham B., Ragot S., Herpin D., Thomas J.D. (2004) Anatomic M-mode, a pertinent tool for the daily practice of transthoracic echocardiography. J Am SocEchocardiogr 17(9): 962–967.
  • 15.   Mele D., Pedini I., Alboni P., Levine R.A. (1998) Anatomic M-mode: a new technique for quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function. Am J Cardiol 81 (12A): 82G-85G.
  • 16.   Hahn R.T., Abraham T., Adams M.S., Bruce C.J., Glas K.E., Lang R.M., Reeves S.T., Shanewise J.S., Siu S.C., Stewart W., Picard M.H., American Society of Echocardiography, Society of Cardiovascular A(2014) Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. AnesthAnalg 118(1): 21–68.
  • 17.   Kasper J., Bolliger D., Skarvan K., Buser P., Filipovic M., Seeberger M.D. (2012) Additional cross-sectional transesophageal echocardiography views improve perioperative right heart assessment. Anesthesiology 117(4): 726–734.
  • 18.   Tan C.O., Harley I. (2014) Perioperative transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of the right heart and associated structures: a comprehensive update and technical report. J CardiothoracVascAnesth 28(4):1100–1121.
  • 19.   Cheng D.C., Bainbridge D., Martin J.E., et al. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005;102:188-203.
  • 20.   Puskas J., Cheng D., Knight J., et al. Off-Pump versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis and Consensus Statement From The 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations (Phila) 2005; 1: 3-27.
  • 21.   Joanna Chikwe, Timothy Lee, ShinobuItagaki, David H. Adams, Natalia N. Egorova, LongTerm Outcomes After Off-Pump Versus OnPump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting by Experienced Surgeons, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Volume 72, Issue 13, 2018, 1478-1486,
  • 22.   Michaux I, Filipovic M, Skarvan K, et al. Effects of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery on right ventricular function. J ThoracCardiovascSurg 2006; 131: 1281-8.
  • 23.   FloForner, A., Hasheminejad, E., Sabate, S. et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2017) 33: 1385.
  • 24.   A. Korshin, L. G et al. The feasibility of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion performed by transesophageal echocardiography throughout heart surgery and its interchangeability with transthoracic echocardiography The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
  • 25.   Flo Forner, Anna &Hasheminejad, E & Dobrovie, M & da Rocha e Silva, J & Ender, Joerg. (2016). Agreement of parameters derived from tricuspid annular movement between transthoracic (TTE) and trasoesophageal (TOE) echocardiography. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 30. S38-S39. 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.024.
  • 26.   Qureshi MY, Eidem BW, Reece CL, O’Leary PW (2015) Two-dimensional measurement of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in children: can it substitute for an m-mode assessment? Echocardiography 32(3):528–534. doi:10.1111/ echo.12687.
  • 27.   AdrianFischl.Comparision of Transesophageal to Transthoracic Echocardiographic Measures of Right Ventricular Function .cardiothoracic and vascular anaesthesia 2019.
  • 28.   Tousignant C, Kim H, Papa F, Mazer CD (2012) Evaluation of TAPSE as a measure of right ventricular output. Can J Anaesth 59(4):376– 383.
  • 29.   Morita Y, Nomoto K., Fischer GW (2016) Modified tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion using transesophageal echocardiography for assessment of right ventricular function. J CardiothoracVascAnesth 30(1):122– 126.
  • 30.   Fusini L., Tamborini G., Gripari P., Maffessanti F., Mazzanti V., Muratori M., Salvi L., Sisillo E., Caiani E.G, Alamanni F, Fioren- tini C., Pepi M (2011) Feasibility of intraoperative three-dimensionaltransesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of right ventricular volumes and function in patients undergo- ing cardiac surgery. J Am SocEchocardiogr 24(8): 868–877.
  • 31.   David J.S., Tousignant C.P., Bowry R (2006) Tricuspid annu- lar velocity in patients undergoing cardiac operation using transesophageal echocardiography. J Am SocEchocardiogr 19(3): 329–334.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

Information not provide.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Balabantaray G, SenDasgupta C. Comparison of tricuspid annular systolic excursion measurement between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in the perioperative setting. Ind J Anesth Analg. 2025;12(3):207-215.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
February 24, 2025 May 30, 2025 September 11, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.12325.6

Keywords

TAPSETTETEEOPCAB

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Tuesday 14 July 2026, 10:02:56 (IST)


5690

Accesses

14
679
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received February 24, 2025
Accepted May 30, 2025
Published September 11, 2025

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share