Home > Journals > Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Submit your article Read this Journals View all journals
Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparison of Subclavian Vein Catheterization Using Supraclavicular Versus Infraclavicular Approach with Ultrasound

Curpod G Srinivas Prasad , Chandrashekar Manjunatha , Curpod G Srinivas Prasad , Nataraj M Srinivasan , Pradeep A Dongare , Mohan Kumar RM

Author Information

Licence:



Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 7(1):p 279-283, January-February 2020. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7120.38

How Cite This Article:

 

Chandrashekar Manjunatha, Curpod G Srinivas Prasad, Nataraj M Srinivasan et al. Comparison of Subclavian Vein Catheterization
Using Supraclavicular Versus Infraclavicular Approach with Ultrasound. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(1 Part -II):279-283.

Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

 

Background: Infraclavicular (IC) approach for Subclavian Vein (SCV) catheterization is widely used compared to Supraclavicular (SC) approach. Recently, SC approach for SCV catheterization has gained prominence because of its well-defined landmarks with more success and less complication rate. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether US guided SC approach or IC, provides the best SCV catheterization and the complications related to either approach. Methodology: A total of 110 patients were randomly divided into
two groups of 55 patients each, the SC group (Group S) and IC group (Group I). All SCV catheterization were done by single trained anesthesiologist. The parameters recorded were access time, successful catheterization, number of attempts, catheter insertion time, ease of guide wire insertion and complications. Results: Mean
access time in Group S was 32.4s compared to 39.24s in Group I. Successful catheterization and numbers of attempts were better in SC approach. Mean catheterization time was 55.4 ± 3.02s in Group S and 78.3 ± 8.605s in Group I and was significant (p < 0.0001). 96.4% patients in Group S and 92.7% patients in Group I was
successfully catheterized and was associated with smooth insertion of guide wire. There were two cases of arterial puncture and one case of hemotoma in Group I as compared to only one case of hemotoma in Group S. Conclusion: SVC cannulation by US guided SC approach is better with respect to IC approach in terms of time for catheterization and complications.

References

No records found.


About this article

Cite this article

 

Chandrashekar Manjunatha, Curpod G Srinivas Prasad, Nataraj M Srinivasan et al. Comparison of Subclavian Vein Catheterization
Using Supraclavicular Versus Infraclavicular Approach with Ultrasound. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2020;7(1 Part -II):279-283.

Licence:



Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7120.38

Keywords

Central venous catheterization; Subclavian vein catheterization; Supraclavicular; Infraclavicular.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 13 July 2026, 06:20:43 (IST)

5648

Accesses

6
678
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords

Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline

Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence




Access this article

Reprint Order Form
Buy this Article
Institutional Subscriptions

Share