Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal and Supreme in Patients Posted for Elective Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Preetham C , Chhaya Joshi1 , Preetham C2 , Archana E3 , SY Hulakund4

Author Information

Licence:




Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 6(1):p 189-196, Jan-Feb 2019. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6119.27

How Cite This Article:

Chhaya Joshi, Preetham C, Archana E et. al. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal and Supreme in Patients Posted for Elective Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2019;6(1):189-196.


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Background: In spite of tremendous advances in contemporary anesthesia practice, airway management continues to be of paramount importance to anesthesiologist. Hemodynamic changes are the major undesirable consequences of endotracheal intubation and laryngoscopy. The supraglottic airway device is a novel device that fills the gap in airway management between tracheal intubation and use of face mask. In view of this, the present study was undertaken to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices LMA supreme and LMA proseal. Methodology: Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups of 30 each. In Group S (n=30) LMA supreme and Group P (n=30) LMA proseal were used respectively. Both the devices were compared in relation to Ease of insertion assessed in terms of attempts taken and duration, Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), Intracuff pressure(ICP), Ease of passing gastric tube and device related postoperative complications. Results: The insertion attempts were similar between two groups. Time taken to provide an effective airway was less in LMA supreme (Group S; 15.9 2.5 Group P; 17.8 1.6) p (0.001). OLP was significantly less in LMA supreme at 1, 15 and 30 min during anesthesia (Group S; 25.2 1.2, 22.8 1.3, 21.1±.9, Group P; 27.5±1.2,25.6±1.5,23.3±1.1) p (<0.05). ICP increased significantly in proseal LMA at 15 and 30 min during anesthesia (Group P; 68.3±1.3,76.8±2.6, Group S; 63.4±1.1, 68.3±1.32) p (<0.05). There was no significance difference in passing gastric tube and device related complications between both groups. Conclusion: Our finding suggested that LMA supreme was better in term of ease of insertion but LMA proseal had better OLP inspite of increase in ICP. Ease of passing gastric tube was similar in both. The complications of usage of LMA are minimal and similar in both the devices.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article

Chhaya Joshi, Preetham C, Archana E et. al. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal and Supreme in Patients Posted for Elective Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2019;6(1):189-196.


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6119.27

Keywords

Laryngeal mask airway; Proseal LMA; Supreme LMA.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 13 July 2026, 11:13:48 (IST)


5651

Accesses

5
678
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share