Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

Comparison of Effect of Norepinephrine Versus Phenylephrine Prophylactic Boluses on Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Study

Pratiksha , Pratiksha1 , P B Jamale2 , V K Dhulkhed3

Author Information

Licence:




Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia 8(1):p 63-69, Jan-feb 2021. | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.8121.9

How Cite This Article:

Pratiksha, P B Jamale, V K Dhulkhed / Comparison of Effect of Norepinephrine Versus Phenylephrine Prophylactic
Boluses on Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Double-Blind, Randomized,
Clinical Study. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2021;8(1):63-69.
 


Timeline

Received : N/A         Accepted : N/A          Published : N/A

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) onset induces maternal hypotension, which can be managed by vasopressors like phenylephrine (PE). However, PE (α-adrenergic agonist) tends to reflexively decrease the heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO). Norepinephrine (NE), being an α-agonist with weak β-adrenergic activity, maintains the blood pressure (BP) with less tendency to decrease the HR and CO, and hence, may be a more useful alternative to PE.

Objectives: To compare the effects of prophylactic boluses of NE and PE on SA-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section, as well as assess the neonatal outcomes and adverse reactions.

Methods: Sixty parturient belonging to ASA class I and II, scheduled for elective cesarean section, were randomly allocated between 2 groups: (i) Group NE (n=30) which received 5 µg intravenous (IV) NE, and (ii) Group PE (n=30) which received 50 µg IV PE as prophylactic boluses immediately after patient repositioning. Rescue bolus interventions using 5 µg NE or 25 µg PE were given for hypotension, respectively. Maternal hemodynamic variables were measured non-invasively. Neonatal outcomes and adverse effects, if any, were also noted and compared.

Results: Pre-operative and post-operative hemodynamic parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, SpO2), adverse incidences (of hypotension, bradycardia, and nausea) as well as neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the number of patients who required additional rescue vasopressor boluses was significantly greater in Group PE than in Group NE (OR for 2 vs 0 bolus = 9.75; OR for 2 vs. 1 bolus = 11.1428).

Conclusion: NE was more efficacious in preventing SA-induced hypotension with better preservation of maternal HR than PE, and hence, can be considered as an alternative to PE.


References

No records found.


About this article


Cite this article

Pratiksha, P B Jamale, V K Dhulkhed / Comparison of Effect of Norepinephrine Versus Phenylephrine Prophylactic
Boluses on Spinal Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Double-Blind, Randomized,
Clinical Study. Indian J Anesth Analg. 2021;8(1):63-69.
 


Licence:




Received Accepted Published
N/A N/A N/A

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.8121.9

Keywords

Spinal anesthesia; Phenylephrine; Norepinephrine; Parturition; Blood pressure; Obstetric surgical procedures.

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 13 July 2026, 07:57:28 (IST)


5648

Accesses

3
678
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received N/A
Accepted N/A
Published N/A

licence



Access this article



Share