Full Text (PDF)
Original Article

At the Crossroads of Development and Migration: Border Village Realities in Nadia District, West Bengal, India

Sovan Chakraborty

Author Information

Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Indian Journal of Research in Anthropology 12(1):p 07-18, January-June 2026. | DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijra.2454.9118.12126.1

How Cite This Article:

Sovan Chakraborty. At the Crossroads of Development and Migration: Border Village Realities in Nadia District, West Bengal, India. Ind J Res Anthropol 2026; 12(1): 07-18.

Timeline

Received : January 31, 2025         Accepted : January 02, 2026          Published : June 30, 2026

Abstract

Migration is the movement of the people from one place to another. It has both positive and negative impact to the society. Development is the change of livelihood and growth that often related with migration. In border region villages always marked by inconsistencies of development and deprivation, shaped by state policies, cross-border mobility, and socio-economic transformations. This study examines the interrelationship between development initiatives and patterns of migration in the border villages of Nadia District, West Bengal, India. It is an area contiguous with Bangladesh and marked by historical, cultural, and economic interconnectedness. The central hypothesis posits that uneven development and limited livelihood diversification drive cyclical and seasonal migration, which in turn reshapes local economies and social structures. Drawing on a mixed-method approach combines household surveys, ethnographic fieldwork, and participatory observation in selected border villages, the study tests the hypothesis by mapping development indicators against migration intensity. The findings reveal that despite infrastructural improvements and state welfare interventions, persistent livelihood insecurity, land fragmentation, and border-related restrictions continue to propel migration, both internal and transnational, as a coping and aspirational strategy. Migration has generated new income streams and remittance-based development but has also deepened social differentiation and gendered vulnerabilities. The paper concludes that borderland development must be reconceptualized beyond physical infrastructure and to include inclusive livelihood planning and frame rural development policies. Anthropologically, the article highlights how border villages function as dynamic socio-economic spaces, where people tactically negotiate state interventions and mobility opportunities.


References

  • 1.   Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2003). The age of migration. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, & London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
  • 2.   Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 3.   Harris, J. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: A twosector analysis. American Economic Review, 60(1), 126–142.
  • 4.   Kapur, D. (2003). Remittances: The new development mantra? Palais des Nations, Geneva. 5. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57.
  • 6.   Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22(2), 139–191.
  • 7.   Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1998). Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 8.   McDowell, C., & de Haan, A. (1997). Migration and sustainable livelihoods: A critical review of the literature. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies.
  • 9.   Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). International migration outlook 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • 10.   Ratha, D. (2003). Workers’ remittances: An important and stable source of external development finance. In Global development finance 2003 (pp. 157–175). Washington,
  • 11.   Ravenstein, E. G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 48(2), 167–227.
  • 12.   Salt, J. (1987). Contemporary trends in international migration study. International Migration, 25(2), 241–251.
  • 13.   Schumacher, E. F. (1977). Small is beautiful. New Delhi: Radhakrishna.
  • 14.   Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
  • 15.   Skeldon, R. (1997). Migration and development: A global perspective. Essex: Longman.
  • 16.   Taylor, J. E. (1999). The new economics of labour migration and the role of remittances in the migration process. International Migration, 37(1), 63–88.
  • 17.   Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in lessdeveloped countries. American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148.
  • 18.   Van Amersfoort, J. M. M. (1998). Migratie en migratietheorieën. In M. E. Penninx (Ed.), Etnische minderheden en de multiculturele samenleving (pp. 59–82). Groningen: WoltersNoordhoff.
  • 19.   Vidyarthi, L. P., & Sahay, B. N. (Eds.). (1980). Applied anthropology and development in India. New Delhi: National.

Data Sharing Statement

There are no additional data available. All raw data and code are available upon request.

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed significantly to the work and approve its publication.

Ethics Declaration

This article does not involve any human or animal subjects, and therefore does not require ethics approval.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the patients, their families, and all those who have contributed to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

No conflicts of interest in this work.


About this article


Cite this article

Sovan Chakraborty. At the Crossroads of Development and Migration: Border Village Realities in Nadia District, West Bengal, India. Ind J Res Anthropol 2026; 12(1): 07-18.


Licence:

Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Received Accepted Published
January 31, 2025 January 02, 2026 June 30, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21088/ijra.2454.9118.12126.1

Keywords

MigrationDevelopmentEthnographyBorder VillagesLivelihood

Article Level Metrics

Last Updated

Monday 13 July 2026, 05:05:23 (IST)


907

Accesses

11
249
00

Citations


NA
NA
NA

Download citation


Article Keywords


Keyword Highlighting

Highlight selected keywords in the article text.


Timeline


Received January 31, 2025
Accepted January 02, 2026
Published June 30, 2026

licence


Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

This license enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.


Access this article



Share