Abstract

This paper includes a quick overview of common non-invasive techniques in addition to a more in-depth analysis of a body composition assessment method. a technique for figuring out composition using quantitative MRI and using fat as a reference. For whole-body measures of adipose tissue (AT), often known as fat, and lean tissue (LT), DXA and quantitative MRIs show excellent agreement, with linear correlations of 0.99 and 0.97 and coefficients of variation (CV) of 4.5 and 4.6% for fat (calculated from AT) and LT, respectively. With a CV of more than 20%, visceral adipose tissue showed much lower agreement. Because of its ability to assess ectopic fat, muscle volumes, and muscle AT infiltration, as well as its speed, quantitative MRI is made possible.

• 1.   Wang ZM, Pierson RN, Heymsfield SB. The five-level model: a new approach to organizing body-composition research. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 56:19–28.
• 2.   Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, et al. Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72:694 701.
• 3.   Thomas EL, Frost G, Taylor-Robinson SD, et al. Excess body fat in obese and normal-weight subjects. Nutr Res Rev 2012; 25:150–61.
• 4.   Shen W, Wang Z, Punyanita M, et al. Adipose tissue quantification by imaging methods: a proposed classification. Obes Res 2003; 11:5–16.
• 5.   Snyder WS Report of the Task group on reference man: a report Oxford Pergamon 1975;1975.
• 6.   Britton KA, Fox CS, Depots EF, et al Circulation 2011;124: e837–e841.
• 7.   Demerath EW, Reed D, Rogers N, et al. Visceral adiposity and its anatomical distribution as predictors of the metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factor levels. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88:1263–71.
• 8.   Liu J, Fox CS, Hickson DA, et al. Impact of abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue on cardiometabolic risk factors: the Jackson Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95:5419–26.
• 9.   Neeland IJ, Ayers CR, Rohatgi AK, et al. Associations of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with markers of cardiac and metabolic risk in obese adults. Obesity 2013;21: n/a–E447.
• 10.   Stahn A, Terblanche E, Gunga H-C. Use of bioelectrical impedance: general principles and overview. In: Preedy VR, ed. Handbook of anthropometry: physical measures of human form in health and disease. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012:49–90
• 11.   Garg MK, Kharb S. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density. Indian J Endocrinol Metab2013; 17:203–10.
• 12.   Kramer H, Pickhardt PJ, Kliewer MA, et al. Accuracy of liver fat quantification with advanced CT, MRI, and ultrasound techniques: prospective comparison with MR spectroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208:92–100.
• 13.   Lareau-Trudel E, Le Troter A, Ghattas B, et al. Muscle quantitative MR imaging and clustering analysis in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1. PLoS One 2015;10: e0132717–16.
• 14.   Silver HJ, Niswender KD, Kullberg J, et al. Comparison of gross body fat-water magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in obese women. Obesity 2013; 21:765–74.
• 15.   Ulbrich EJ, Nanz D, Leinhard OD, et al. Whole-body adipose tissue and lean muscle volumes and their distribution across gender and age: MR-derived normative values in a normal-weight Swiss population. Magn Reson Med2018;79

Data Sharing Statement

Funding